CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.
Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.
Are you claiming to be telepathic now, dummy? Or is it that you've conducted a full global census about how people feel towards what I post? Oh no, my bad. Neither of those is remotely plausible, so I'll have to choose the third option, which is that you're simply a fucking idiot.
You never explained what exactly is wrong with t = -t1.
That's just plain untrue. Not that I even needed to, given that anybody educated to Kindergarten level can see how and why that equation is mathematically impossible.
What's wrong with variable sunbstitutions?
Are you literally a fucking imbecile lad? t = -t1 substitutes nothing. It gives you two different values for t.
Shut your fucking stupid mouth. You're thicker than a tube of goddamned toothpaste.
So time reversal in equations is mathematically impossible for you? This means you know nothing about math.
t = -t1 substitutes nothing. It gives you two different values for t.
It does no such thing. It means we are introducing a new variable t1 which is bound with the variable t as described. Writing "it gives two different values for t" could have been considered plain illiteracy had I not explained to you what the substitution means. Now it's just plain retarded and you're not even shying away from that, in fact seem to be proud of it.
They should also have an IQ filter, which would be the best anti-troll deterrent Andy could possibly implement on the site. Sixty percent of accounts would vanish overnight.
That would be contemptibly stupid, lying retards such as yourself, who get everything they ever attempt to discuss completely wrong, and who attempt to "disguise" it with a wave of children's emoticons, playground taunts and Freudian projection.
One week after sending Mingiwoowoo private messages that he is a "dirty fat nigger", he decides to send me messages insisting that I am a racist. He also accused me of having 91 alt accounts (instead of the 103 he's accusing me today of having), so he's literally so stupid that he can't even remember the specifics of his own bullshit. Jody is a pointlessly stupid moron with nothing intelligent (or true) to say about any topic known to man. He's literally just a fucking retard who tries his best to debate people, gets exposed as a retard, and then tries to convince the world the complete opposite just happened.
I’m a contemptibly stupid, lying retard who gets everything they ever attempt to discuss completely wrong, and who attempt to "disguise" it with a wave of children's emoticons, playground taunts and Freudian projection.
Yes I know that , and hows your time travel “theory “ faring out 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Lmao. And if you knew what Freudian projection is you'd have avoided proving my own point for me. I guess it's lucky for me that you're more stupid than a bag of salad.
Lmao. And if you knew what Freudian projection is you'd have avoided proving my own point for me. I guess it's lucky for me that you're more stupid than a bag of salad.
But you’re the over excited schoolgirl who last week said breathlessly “ hey guys time travel is now a reality “ 😂😂😂 Yesterday you followed up with this beauty “ winding back a video tape is .....time travel “ ......oooooookay 😂😂😂😂👌👌😂👋
But you’re the over excited schoolgirl who last week said breathlessly “ hey guys time travel is now a reality “
No I didn't. You literally made that up. Words truly cannot express what a pointless imbecile you are. There is just no value in anything you write. Spamming emoticons like a 13 year old because you have nothing intelligent to say is just stupid. You have no comedic value whatsoever, otherwise you wouldn't need to laugh at your own jokes. You're just sad mate.
You give me way too much credit. Scientists have postulated that particles can move back through time since the days of Feynman and probably even earlier. In fact, anti-particles like the positron can mathematically be considered to be ordinary particles moving back through time. Some physicists even believe there are particles left over from the big bang called tachyons which surpass the speed of light and hence travel perpetually into the past.
But you wouldn't know about any of that, would you? The closest you ever came to science is when your daddy taught you how to blow up pubs.
I know I’m waiting on your peer reviewed paper demonstrating that playing a tape back is time travel
Scientists have postulated that particles can move back through time since the days of Feynman and probably even earlier. In fact, anti-particles like the positron can mathematically be considered to be ordinary particles moving back through time. Some physicists even believe there are particles left over from the big bang called tachyons which surpass the speed of light and hence travel perpetually into the past.
Reading what it says on wiki doesn’t help your case and appeals to authority are even less impressive
But you wouldn't know about any of that, would you? The closest you ever came to science is when your daddy taught you how to blow up pubs.
But your daddy told you “ watch this “ and played a video back and said “ that’s what them fancy city fellers call time travel son “ and of course you swallow hook , line and sinker
I know I’m waiting on your peer reviewed paper demonstrating that playing a tape back is time travel
Playing a tape back is not time travel, which is why it was so spectacularly stupid of you to place your faith in an article which claimed that it was.
Reading what it says on wiki doesn’t help your case
Wiki agrees that you are a pointless imbecile and that helps my case tremendously.
But your daddy told you “ watch this “ and played a video back and said “ that’s what them fancy city fellers call time travel son “
Awesome. Your daddy told you, "watch this" and then Semtexed a police station. Daft Irish bastard.
, which is why it was so spectacularly stupid of you to place your faith in an article which claimed that it was.
The article never claimed playing a tape back was time travel .....you did
Wiki agrees that you are a pointless imbecile and that helps my case tremendously.
Wiki says the same thing about you and your 103 alts
Awesome. Your daddy told you, "watch this" and then Semtexed a police station. Daft Irish bastard.
Read it and weep,😱😱😱
As Scott Aaronson, director of the Quantum Information Center at the University of Texas at Austin, says, “If you’re simulating a time-reversible process on your computer, then you can ‘reverse the direction of time’ by simply reversing the direction of your simulation. From a quick look at the paper, I confess that I didn’t understand how this becomes more profound if the simulation is being done on IBM’s quantum computer.”
Other quantum computing experts we spoke to agreed. One, who did not wish to be named, said: “I don’t know how useful this is … it doesn’t mean that these guys made a time machine. They certainly didn’t violate the laws of thermodynamics or the laws of physics.” He added: “This is the type of hype that is going to give quantum computing a bad name.”
Why do you keep sending me messages saying you like little boys?
The article never claimed playing a tape back was time travel
"Playing a tape back" is an analogy you stole from the article and has never been mentioned by anybody else other than you.
you did
You are literally just such a stupid and pathetic liar that it is pointless even conversing with you. Your lies are just so fucking stupid that they are not even worth acknowledging.
As Scott Aaronson, director of the Quantum Information Center at the University of Texas at Austin, says
As I've already informed you three times already you stupid fucking retard, Scott Aaronson is a professor of computer science with no relevant qualifications in the field of quantum physics. The person who wrote your article was literally so fucking stupid that he went to see a professor of computer science to ask him questions about a quantum physics experiment conducted with an electron.
I keep sending messages to random strangers saying i like little boys
You need help son
“Playing a tape back" is an exactly the same as time travel which is why I keep mentioning it
I know you never stop do you?
I’m literally just such a stupid and pathetic liar that it is pointless even conversing with me
Agreed
My lies are just so fucking stupid that they are not even worth acknowledging.
Yes I know
I’m a stupid fucking retard, Scott Aaronson is a professor of computer science with relevant qualifications in the field of quantum physics. The person who wrote your article was literally brilliant
In fact, anti-particles like the positron can mathematically be considered to be ordinary particles moving back through time.
Finally you'we written someting relevant. But this has nothing to do with the recent "experiment" which wasn't even using quantum relativistic electrodynamics as is obvious from the research paper text. The wave function they were using is the ordinary wave function from classical quantum mechanics, not Dirac's 4-function from relativistic quantum mechanics.
I see what you did there. You're trying to discredit my argument by agreeing with it. Very clever. Take advantage of your own lack of credibility. Sneaky.
which wasn't even using quantum relativistic electrodynamics as is obvious from the research paper text
Let me ask you a serious question because I'm actually extremely interested in the answer. After completely discrediting yourself as an idiot who does not comprehend the most basic of mathematical equations, which part of you has convinced the rest of you that anybody is going to be interested in your opinion on quantum relativistic electrodynamics or any other phrases you pull off Google?
Pardon me for pointing out the obvious, but you are still acting as though you have some form of credibility when discussing physics. You have absolutely none, and your failure to comprehend that leads me to believe you may potentially have some form of psychiatric problem.
You're trying to discredit my argument by agreeing with it.
I was agreeing specifically with your statement that time reversal can effectively take place in particle physics. Not that this has anything to do with the "experiment" you seem to be so excited with.
After completely discrediting yourself
You have no idea what mathematical equations are. That's OK for a journalist I guess, but your attempts to find what you think is a "mistake" are fairly idiotic and not even funny anymore.
I was agreeing specifically with your statement that time reversal can effectively take place in particle physics.
Which does a nice job of contradicting the three full days you spent trying to persuade me that, contrary to specific information published in multiple reliable sources, Russian physicists didn't really just reverse the flow of time. You just make this crap up as you go along and the truly sad thing is that it is so overtly obvious.
You have no idea what mathematical equations are.
Your empty rhetoric is pointless because the entire website saw you post the equation t = -t1. You can't take that back. Neither can you take back the time you spent trying to weasel your way out of it by spamming the phrase "simple variable substitution". You clearly don't realise it, but I give you my personal guarantee that every person on this website with a grade school understanding of maths is laughing at your pure, unadulterated stupidity. Look, you obviously have mental health issues. I'm not judging. I'm just trying to make you aware of them.
You're a retard if you think I was contradicting anything. Particle physics is not plain classical quantum mechanics, it's relativistic quantum mechanics and that does not appear in the research paper. Not that you've read it of course. Since you're a google expert you don't need to bother yourself with actually reading the reasearch you yap your mouth about.
Your empty rhetoric is pointless because the entire website saw you post the equation t = -t1. You can't take that back.
Why the hell would I take it back? Your insistance on being a total retard does not mean I need to retract anything.
weasel your way out of it by spamming the phrase "simple variable substitution
contrary to specific information published in multiple reliable sources
Sorry, but online pop sci websites are not reliable sources. The research paper has been provided for you, yet you ignore it. You are the epitome of dishonest.
We don’t do thanksgiving in Europe Joe , the said Turkey meets its inevitable fate at Christmas the one time of the year when we actually do eat Turkey 🦃
a large mainly domesticated game bird native to North America, having a bald head and (in the male) red wattles. It is a popular food on festive occasions such as Christmas and (in the US) Thanksgiving.
2.
INFORMAL•NORTH AMERICAN
something that is extremely or completely unsuccessful, especially a play or film.
"the movie flopped—the second in a trio of turkeys"
I could go along with that, the "PG" would cover the "Putin Guys", the "R" would cover the Racists, then we could have the "X" rated … like outlaw, maybe a "PGG" rating for "Progressive Good Guys" and "NFL" for "No F*ckin Liars" …. could work …………. ;-)
AL thinks that all that voted against his Gal Hillary are PUTIN GUYS now DOCTOR AL that is a ticket any DEMORAT could run on and possibly be a WINNING TICKET for your PARTY