CreateDebate


Debate Info

Debate Score:86
Arguments:83
Total Votes:94
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Democrat Tina Podlodowski wants to register "New Voters at Birth" (79)

Debate Creator

outlaw60(15500) pic



Democrat Tina Podlodowski wants to register "New Voters at Birth"

Democrats who got hammered in the 2016 presidential election and lost more than 1,000 legislative seats while Barack Obama was president want to register new voters. How new? How about the minute they're born? A Democratic leader in Washington State(Tina Podlodowski) is moving to pass legislation to get people registered to vote at birth. If you look at different countries, European countries or Scandinavian countries, basically folks walk in when they’re 18 and they just start voting and don’t have to register, Podlodowski said. Because they were registered at birth.

The Progressives just can't help it that all they can do is to refer to European countries as their role model !

Add New Argument
2 points

Can't "assume" if a baby is male or female but can determine it's political party? LMAO!

The absurdity of the Progressive Party just keeps on marching on.

2 points

Good job of pointing out how these mindless Liberals won't even admit a baby boy is absoutely a baby boy.

These dysfunctional people on the Left who blindly accept the opposite gender some person claims to be, are now going to register a newborn to a transgender registration.

He will be registered at birth with a LGBTPYZABC card. He will be able to vote no matter if he is illegal or not. Do you see what they are trying to do? They want any person in our ntion regardless of their legal status to be able to vote.

Cartman(18192) Disputed
1 point

If the child is born in the U.S.they are legal to vote.

Cartman(18192) Disputed
2 points

It doesn't say anything about registering for a political party.

outlaw60(15500) Disputed
1 point

SouthPark it's all about registering for a political party why else would a Progressive like Tina Podlodowski want to put such a ridiculous thing in a law !

1 point

Though I do see this as being quite ridiculous, if they're being registered without party affiliation I don't see a problem. I think the better solution is to allow someone to register prior to turning 18 so if an election is the day after their 18th birthday, they would have no issues in taking part.

outlaw60(15500) Disputed
1 point

Why is it the Progressives want babies to be registered at birth to vote ? There is a reason behind it so what is that reasoning ?

sylynn(626) Disputed
1 point

This isn't something I want so I can't answer you.

1 point

Hello:

Voting SHOULD be a right. If it was, registering at birth is as good a time as any.

excon

PS> Oh, I get it.. You're trying to say that those nutty libs want BABIES to vote.. Okee doakee..

outlaw60(15500) Disputed
1 point

Ex-Con:

LMMFAO babies have the right to vote ? When did this happen ?

sylynn(626) Disputed
1 point

According to your own premise, "European countries or Scandinavian countries, basically folks walk in when they’re 18 and they just start voting and don’t have to register, Podlodowski said. Because they were registered at birth."

So registering a baby has nothing to do with casting a vote as a baby.

1 point

First thought, babies get both birth certificates and social security cards right after birth instead of waiting until they are 18, so adding voting capability is not necessarily bad. Granted they still should be blocked until legal age and their residence/polling location is up to date.

Second thought, if you're afraid Democrats or liberals are going to exploit this somehow then maybe you need to get out of the way of abortions so you can minimize your risks?

Third thought is didn't your conservative side just post that women are more attracted to conservatives? Yes? Then what are you worried about? Clearly this will be an army of new conservatives.

outlaw60(15500) Disputed
2 points

So babies should be registered to vote according to the Progressive. Okay so what party should the newborns be registered in ? LMMFAO

Grenache(6103) Clarified
1 point

Independent. How hard was that?

Don't like it? Well then just make it legally blank until they turn 18. Again, how hard was that?

FromWithin(7680) Disputed
2 points

So your answer to people who don't agree with registering voters at birth, is to become inhuman pro abortion supporters, and then they would not have to worry about babies being registered because the Baby would be dead?

WOW! If that was an attempt at humor, even your humor is sick. I don't think it was humor because people like you support even no restriction abortons for any reason.

Grenache(6103) Disputed
1 point

Oh I'm quite clever, and funny, too. But you wouldn't know that because you're a one note bore. And really all I did was turn several types of your own recent conservative arguments back upon you. That's called a "turn" in academic debate lingo and when used with a live impartial judge in the back of a debate room it's one of the most persuasive techniques you can use in debate. Because hey, it's making someone else's words work against them.

That's what I did. So what are you going to do?

1 point

She wants people born in the US to be registered at birth so that when they turn legal voting age (18), they can vote straight away, without having to jump through bureaucratic loops. It's hardly a radical idea.

1 point

I am honestly curious and I would like a genuine answer without all the "Progressive", "Liberal" finger pointing. What do you think she is trying to do in passing this legislature? What exactly do you think will happen if babies are registered to vote at birth?

They still can't vote until they are 18. So what are you thinking is going to happen?

0 points

mary cotton suxxxxxx. she makes me actually want to kill myself. she is mean to lesbians and cant even conjugate a simple latin word. i hope one day i can cut off her ponytail and choke her with it.

Anniesbae123(2) Disputed
1 point

for your information, mary cotton is one of the main supporters of "new voters at birth" and if you believe that she is mean to lesbians then you are assuming that she is mean to the children of lesbians. also, she has given her hair multiple times to locksoflove.org so you must hate bald people

hillaryluv(5) Disputed
1 point

According to your own premise, "European countries or Scandinavian countries, basically folks walk in when they’re 18 and they just start voting and don’t have to register, Podlodowski said. Because they were registered at birth."

So registering a baby has nothing to do with casting a vote as a baby.