CreateDebate


Debate Info

23
5
No. They're basically flawed. Yes. They're accurate.
Debate Score:28
Arguments:12
Total Votes:31
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 No. They're basically flawed. (10)
 
 Yes. They're accurate. (2)

Debate Creator

Ferquan(7) pic



Do Polls Actually Tell Us What America Thinks?

Who Are Those Guys Talking To?

According to a CNN pollster, only 1/8 of 1% of the population (~25,000 of 300+ million people) actually get polled. The primary system relies on phone interviews. Does that really give an accurate picture? What about pollster's bias? People who don't have phones? People who have only cell phones? People who work split schedules?

No. They're basically flawed.

Side Score: 23
VS.

Yes. They're accurate.

Side Score: 5
5 points

My feeling is that a lot of polls are designed to create news and not to gage true opinions.

Side: No. They're basically flawed.
2 points

Polls are just made to influence people in the politcal system to vote for there party. This may neither be right or wrong , but the polls should explain this to the people.

Side: No. They're basically flawed.
2 points

I absolutely agree. Further, the polls are often done in a way to get whatever the desired answers the pollsters are seeking based on the demographics of the people polled.

Side: No. They're basically flawed.

Polls actually tell us nothing but what they want us to think.

I've been alive for 62 years and have lived in both New York and Connecticut. I have NEVER received a request to participate in any major poll and neither has anyone I know. The education range is from High School Graduate to Ph D's in many areas including Doctorates. The work range is equally as diverse. Flawed is too nice a word for those who can choose any demographic they wish in order to obtain the right spin on a question (s) answered.

Phone interviews are as skewed as the rest, if not more so, in today's world. I am registered with the Do Not Call Registry for my home and cellular services.

Side: No they are basically full of it
2 points

Although they try to obtain a "statistically significant sample" and ensure they use a representative cross-sample of the US, I think that such a small number of people can't possibly predict what the entire country thinks. There seems to be some fundamental bias associated with these types of polls that exclude people described in the debate description.

Side: No. They're basically flawed.
2 points

Makes you wonder, doesn't it. If all those polls are not really giving an accurate picture, why does the media spend so-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o much time talking about them?

Side: No. They're basically flawed.
2 points

The problem with polls is you have to remember who has access to even vote on the poll. If it's put online, especially on a site that isn't huge, then you're not including all the people in middle america who either don't have the internet, or don't use it for more than e-mail and movie listings, not to mention all the people who simply aren't looking for the poll in particular.

Side: No. They're basically flawed.
2 points

The questions are generally phrased to reflect the bias of the pollster and force a biased answer from the respondent.

Side: No. They're basically flawed.
1 point

I used to work at Gallup Poll in Austin Texas. One day they had one of the corporate heads (I think it might have been the main guy actually) come and discuss "Gallup's Future" with us. This was 1997 and the corp guy gleefully regaled us with the fact that Gallup had moved their headquarters to a boat three miles (the point where American jurisdiction stops) offshore. They were accountable to no one.

Now take that little fact to heart and take a look at the current polls per McCain and Obama. Add that to the fact Gallup bases their responses on landlines ONLY. Now who has cell phones? Yes, likely Obama voters. Add a ten percent margin FOR Republican voters and viola, you have a tie.

The polls are baloney.

Side: No. They're basically flawed.

No poll is infallible. There will be errors made in any poll. People must be cautious of polls.

Side: No. They're basically flawed.
3 points

I think the science of polling is advanced enough that they are accurate. The problem is that I believe people lie and that pollsters rarely reveal to us the exact wording they use in their polls and so we dont know what intentional biases are built deliberately into the poll or exactly what question they are designed to answer. Lastly, dont forget that most polls are ordered by an less than non interested party.

Side: Yes. They're accurate.
1 point

They're accurate to the percent that they say they are. If you notice, all of them have disclaimers about the percentage they might be off based on sampling error. For the first half of 2007, only 15% of households didn't have a landline. The gallup poll also tests cellphone users. If you randomize the people you call enough, that's not a very significant loss. The rest is just statistics about sample size and random sampling math. Those footnotes explain what the survey really is surveying. Just remember that if the error margin is 2%, it could be that one is 2% higher and the other is 2% lower

Supporting Evidence: landline data (www.cdc.gov)
Side: Yes. They're accurate.