Debate Info

35
66
Yes No
Debate Score:101
Arguments:56
Total Votes:114
Show More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 No (62)
 
 yes (27)

Debate Creator

silaswash(4675) pic



Bookmark this debate on your favorite social network by clicking the appropriate icon below:
social bookmarks Digg reddit facebook twitter delicious google yahoo stumbleupon newsvine mixx furl technorati slashdot spurl diigo blinklist simpy
Want to add a CreateDebate link or button to your website or blog? Click Here

Do You Think Its Bad To Lust For A Man Or Woman?


Yes

Side Score: 35
VS.

No

Side Score: 66

I dont think that it is bad nessacarily. I think that you should resist such thoughts, but acting upon the urge is its falling into temptation, are you so weak minded that if you see a gurl thats bad beyond all that you can't keep your eesh in ya pants and just have a conversation with her?

656 days ago | Side: yes
vote vote
2 points

Then Why does religion Exist, it draws the line for such questions, well actually ALL QUESTIONS!! But the Question Is, Which one is the Right one!!

364 days ago | Side: yes
vote vote
1 point  

It depends on if said person is your spouse or not. If he/she is, then it is fine.

672 days ago | Side: yes
iamdavidh(3790) Disputed
vote vote
4 points

>< ...

How do you know who to marry if you never feel lust prior? ._.

672 days ago | Side: No
Kinda(1630) Disputed
vote vote
3 points

LMAO are you retarded?

Millions of people marry without lust and on average the marriages are more succesful than those who marry based on lust...

671 days ago | Side: yes
vote vote
1 point  

Yes it's wrong. Ofcourse it's wrong.

I do it all the time. It's like drinking alcohol or smoking or something. We all know it's bad for us and the world would be a better place without it... but fuck it ehh??

671 days ago | Side: yes
vote vote
2 points

Yes it's wrong. Ofcourse it's wrong.

Why?

I do it all the time.

Unrequited I imagine.

It's like drinking alcohol or smoking or something.

Are you implying that it is somehow bad for one's health?

We all know it's bad for us and the world would be a better place without it

If by "better" you mean devoid of humans then you are correct.

but fuck it ehh?

There is nothing to "fuck it ehh?" about. One should not apologise for following a biological imperative.

660 days ago | Side: No
Kinda(1630) Disputed
vote vote
2 points

Cmon little doggie over here.

I don't even have to call you. You'll just follow me. Fucking brilliant.

659 days ago | Side: yes

There is nothing "bad" about human nature. Why do religious people hate people so much?

672 days ago | Side: No
vote vote
5 points

No, it is not bad to lust for a man or woman because, simply put, it is human nature. It is perfectly normal for an individual to be attracted to someone physically and express them in a passionate manner. That physical attraction without emotional attachment is what makes this lust and not love. However, I feel it's only acceptable if the individual isn't committed to someone else, because that would make it cheating, which is a whole different story.

672 days ago | Side: No
AuntieChrist(470) Supported
vote vote
3 points

I think the debate creator is talking about lusting for another person in the biblical sense, whereby you don't actually do anything, you just look at somebody and think to yourself...oh yeah (and that of course is the same thing as adultery in the Bible, so after you do that, you can look forward to the fiery lake and torture forever, etc).

672 days ago | Side: No
mudkipz2(350) Disputed
vote vote
2 points

i like how you distort things from the bible. the lusting talking about in the bible is like looking at pornography or having sexual fantasies over some one you saw. like you want the girl you saw to do sexual things for you. things like that. there's nothing wrong with being attracted to some one and admitting their pretty.

672 days ago | Side: yes

Lust (in homo-sapiens at any rate) is the driving force behind reproduction, without such a strong ingrained need to lust after the opposite sex (or the same sex, as it may be, although that doesn't really aid reproduction) we most likely wouldn't be here today - we are all, nearly every one of us the product of lust. So, in my opinion, the question is a little absurd. I think the only things that can really be classed as 'bad' are those that harm, take advantage of or deprive others - greed, hate, irresponsibility, selfishness - can, I think, all be classed as 'bad' (although bad, good, evil etc. are all such implicitly subjective terms I much prefer to refer to such things as undesirable).

So short answer: no, it is perfectly natural to lust over others and we, as a species, wouldn't be around today if it weren't for such urges.

670 days ago | Side: No
Kinda(1630) Disputed
vote vote
1 point  

So obviously animals have lust

Also gays having lust kind of defeats the whole reproduction concept.

667 days ago | Side: yes
vote vote
2 points

So obviously animals have lust

They also move, respire, eat and sleep. Are we to refrain from doing these things?

Also gays having lust kind of defeats the whole reproduction concept.

The morality behind Homosexuality is a separate issue.

660 days ago | Side: No

No,I don't think it's bad to lust for a man/woman. It's natural,as humans,we are going to do it. Even if it's a person you eventually end up marrying,you still lusted for them at one time or another. Chances are,you're physically attracted to that person,and that is considered lust,believe it or not. So go on and lust away,just try to avoid doing it too much,then it becomes not so good

669 days ago | Side: No

What's wrong with something that's going to motivate you to create more babies?

671 days ago | Side: No

Are you seriously asking whether it is wrong for humans to act like humans? I think anybody who would suggest that sexual attraction (and the inevitable fantasies) is wrong is a self-repressed, religious freak. Why do people place such limits on themselves? I think that a human who feels no form of attraction to other humans is wrong.

662 days ago | Side: No
garry77777(1689) Supported
vote vote
1 point  

I think i should retract my statement in the debate on Bin Laden about you belonging in a more unawakened time, i have to admit i was wrong, and i couldn't agree more with what you just wrote.

364 days ago | Side: No
vote vote
2 points

I think lust is very important for any kind of sexual relationship. if there isnt any lust then you guys aren't going to want to get it on with each other. and if you are one of those "hit it and quit it" types then being lustful can lead to very hot, kinky, sweaty, amazing sex

655 days ago | Side: No
Popular Debates: Girls Should be Able to do Boy Sports Media Censorship Do you believe in ghosts?



About CreateDebate
The CreateDebate Blog
Take a Tour
Help/FAQ
Newsletter Archive
Sharing Tools
Invite Your Friends
Bookmarklets
Partner Buttons
RSS & XML Feeds
Reach Out
Advertise
Contact Us
Report Abuse
Twitter
Basic Stuff
User Agreement
Privacy Policy
Sitemap
Creative Commons



©2012 hardwarehelpers.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved. User content, unless source quoted, licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Debate Forum | Big shout-outs to The Bloggess and Andy Cohen.