CreateDebate


Debate Info

Debate Score:27
Arguments:61
Total Votes:33
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Do atoms want nations to exist? (16)

Debate Creator

Mariel33(456) pic



Do atoms want nations to exist?


Add New Argument
1 point

"Does CreateDebate want you to stop making nonsense debate topics?"

-Yes

Mariel33(456) Clarified
1 point

Reality runs both ways. I could accuse so many debates on CreateDebate not created by me of being the very same thing my debates are being accused of.

TrumpsHair(310) Clarified Banned
1 point

Indeed you could, and for a lot of them, you would be right.

Well, I know that atom bombs seem to have an aversion to nations, so maybe the answer would be no, atoms see their role in the universe as the destroyers of nations. I mean, an atom bomb isn't going to waste all that energy on blowing up just one individual person,well maybe there would be a few exceptions. Can you think of any?

Mariel33(456) Clarified
1 point

I think anyone would have to agree that life forms aren't life forms, in order for atoms to be atoms.

1 point

I suppose that you are asking whether or not atoms have a mind of their own.

That would explain why the universe is so intricately designed and especially ,the human survival mechanisms.

Mariel33(456) Clarified
1 point

Thanks for visiting. Yes, essentially I'm asking if atoms are purposeful - and if they are, what does that mean about the different elements and types of matter that get created.

Are all the things which exist meant to exist, because atoms themselves are "hardwired" to manifest in their own different ways?

If atoms are uniformly purposeful, does that mean that a cruise ship is as intended as a school playground, or that a newspaper is as intended as a random thought of someone?

If a newspaper is as intended, does that then mean that all the content of that newspaper is meant to exist - politics, sport, culture, scandal, bigotry, violence and war etc?

1 point

The only sense in that everything could be considered predetermined is that nothing in the universe could exist without the existence of the universe, so when the universe was created it essentially created a universe of possibilities. Nothing exists in and of itself. The universe wouldn't exist if there was nothing to observe it. Sound wouldn't exist if nobody could hear it. Speed and size wouldn't exist without something to compare it to and meaning wouldn't exist without the lack thereof but that's different because "meaning" and "purpose" are terms derived from non-tangible human understanding. "Meaning" is a relative term. If meaning meant the same to everybody then everybody would feel the same way about everything, so by definition your question is impossible to answer. Even if it was proven that the universe does have meaning, the true meaning is something you'd have to answer for yourself because it can't exist outside your understanding of it.