CreateDebate


Debate Info

Debate Score:7
Arguments:9
Total Votes:9
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Do you gun control loonies want background checks for alcohol in Bars? Still no answer! (5)

Debate Creator

FromWithin(8241) pic



Do you gun control loonies want background checks for alcohol in Bars? Still no answer!

Gee, I wonder why I ban deceptive people who refuse to answer simple questions when it shows your true colors.

If the real reasons for more gun control legislation is to save lives, why won't you support back ground checks in public places that sell alcohol to possible repeat DWI offenders?

I don't want this, but if your goal is to save lives with all your anti Gun rhetoric, you should be over joyed to save many thousands more lives by having background checks on people before buying alcohol in public places.

Do you have any idea how many times repeat DWI drivers continue to drink and drive? They drive even when their licenses are revoked!

The only way to prevent this is to do a background check before they buy that weapon of death.....ALCOHOL!

Wait, what you say? You say you don't want to be inconvienenced by background checks when buying alcohol? You say you are a law abiding citizen who would never drink and drive?
You say you don't want to pay more for alcohol to pay for those background checks for past DWI drivers?

I THOUGHT YOUR GOAL WAS TO SAVE LIVES? You expect law abidng citizens to pay more and put up with all the inconvienence from your anti gun legislation, but when it comes to your alcohol...... HANDS OFF?

A drunk driver behind the wheels of a car happens millions of times more often than some lunatic with a gun! The odds of you or your loved one being killed by a drunk driver is far higher than the odds of being shot at a concert or Church.

You are hypocrites and total jokes. You prove you could not care less about saving lives. You final goal is to take our guns.

You always spew your ludicrous reasoning why only guns should be singled out to save lives. A police state is just fine as long as it only controls one particular weapon of death..... the gun.

You say we already have alcohol restrictions? Yes, and we already have gun restrictions. You can't buy a gun under age, the same as alcohol. We can't shoot people, you can't hunt near public places and you can not drink and drive. BUT PEOPLE STILL DO IT!

IT'S NOT THE WEAPON OF CHOICE, BUT THE PERSON BEHIND THAT WEAPON. Use the brain God gave you and start addressing why people grow up to be criminals, or become irresponsible drinkers who have no problem drinking and driving.

Start addressing the core problem instead of their weapon of choice.
Add New Argument

You are truly are naive if you believe the Left's ultimate goal is not to take our guns. They can not simply show their true colors. They must take our guns slowly so as not to notice. Kind of like a frog slowly dieing when increasing the temperature of water.

It took one hundred years for the UK to take their guns. One step at a time.

Remember when Democrats supposedly only wanted first trimester abortions? Now they support no restriction abortions for any reason up to birth.

Remember when they only wanted civil unions? Then when the courts were filled with liberals they forced Gay marriage on every State.

Remember when they said tax payers would never pay for abortions. Then they forced everyone to pay for medicaid abortions.

You are truly a fool if you believe their lies. THEY WANT TO TAKE OUR GUNS AS EVEN SOME LIBERALS HAVE ADMITTED.

1 point

Your debate actually has been answered. Just not directly to yours since most of whom you consider "loonies" were banned, and the rest of us already know what to expect in response.

In your previous post you said: "Don't get me wrong. I don't want back ground checks in bars, etc...... I'm not an idiot."

I answered: "Well.....gee....maybe the reason why they don't want background checks in bars is because THEY aren't idiots either."

In a previous debate you said: "I'm waiting for you to address my entire point of back ground checks in bars for repeat DWI offenders, TO SAVE LIVES! Oh, that's right, it would inconvienence you and make your alcohol cost more."

My direct response to you was, "I don't care if alcohol costs more, go ahead and tax the crap out of it and apply that towards our infrastructure."

You've gotten an answer twice now. So why do you keep shouting for it?

FromWithin(8241) Disputed
1 point

HOGWASH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Read your words once again and see why I ignored you.

I asked you if you supported back ground checks on people when they buy alcohol in bars and you resonded.....you don't care if they tax the crap out of it.

ONE LAST TIME YOU DECEPTIVE PERSON.......would you want Big brother Government doing background checks on people when they buy drinks in bars?

IT'S A SIMPLE QUESTION....ANSWER IT!

Amarel(5669) Clarified
1 point

There is a mechanism already in place for this. To reduce DWI's, you can still drink, but you cannot drive for a period of time if you have broken this law. If you do it too much, you can never drive again (or own a gun for that matter). Tackling it on the driving end is more efficient than tackling it on the drinking end. But the issue does already have the governments hands in it.

Mint_tea(4641) Disputed
1 point

Like I said, already know what to expect from your responses.

Have you answered ANY of the questions I've asked you in the previous debates? Nope.

So don't go around demanding others do. The funny thing is, you already know the answer because it was given before.

Do I want big brother doing background checks? It's a waste of money and resources and there are already measures put in place to try to limit drinking. I said that in a previous debate. BUT if that is what is needed because there is an issue I am open to it and would be fine with it. That is no inconvenience to me. So what is your suggestion for our mass shooting epidemic?

There is your answer, it was given before and I'm giving it to you again in the hopes that you'll actually read it.

I read my words and the reason you ignore is the same, you were backed into a corner and couldn't answer the questions asked. You lied and accused me of saying something I clearly did not say and you couldn't even gain the fortitude to admit that you were mistaken. Maybe if you could do even that one little thing, you wouldn't have to go to the copied debates to talk to other people.

Before you shout your usual "IGNORE", don't worry about it, I'm moving on.