Do you see a pattern hear? Socialist President and now socialist mayor of NYC
Try sitting back in your chair and look at our nation after six years of a closet Socialist President and administration. The national debt has DOUBLED the combined debt of every president in our history in SIX SHORT YEARS! Look at all the scandals, all the class warfare, all the race bating, the swollen welfare roles. I guess for Socialism to be ushered in, these extreme radical politicains must divide & conquer. They don't bring both sides together as Obama said he would do.
Now look in NYC where the newly elected Socialist Mayor is playing the race game against the Police officers. We just had two cops murdered because of it. Do you see a pattern hear?
The Democrat party has become the closet Socialist party and our nation is being torn apart from within. We need no outside enemies to take us down. There entire political strategy is demonizing one American against the other.
|
I don't believe that the america is a socialistic type of government but i see that you do recognize the down fall in our economy over the last eight years Obama has managed to hypothetically put everyone money into a giant pool for everyone to have equally if they are not employed! now people who are employed not only cant have access to this hypothetically pool of money but are taxed to put there hard earned money into it! that's right! and the wealthier you are the more money you have to contribute!you may ask yourself? where does this money go? well its equally distributed to anyone who files for unemployment benefits! this mean they can get paid for long periods of time without a job! do you think people who have low income would abuse this system! in fact the unemployment rate is a living proof and how does a economy work if there is population that dose not work! companies move there production facilities to low taxed country and jobs are lost in america because jobs are being lost and its ok cause the democratic party had agreed to this welfare idea in 2008! this happens for 8 years that enough time to help are debut even more ! the american people don't even have the money to fill the pool so we borrow money from china no just for the pool but for our military,industry,and debut plus interests ( if you understand finance then this all makes sense) 17 trillion in debut and its getting worse? we see the downfall in the american economy because of the democratic views! 1
point
The United States president Barack Obama is not a socialist. When has he ever came out and said he supports a socialist system. He supports a mixed economy popular among Keynesian thinkers. No way is he a socialist As for Bill de Blasio, I don't know how you are referring to socialism? He himself has made decisions that would expand the power of the city government and have more regulation but I have no idea how that makes him a socialist? He again would seem to be Keynesian. Are you using a different definition or socialism then I am thinking of? 1
point
WOW! Do you actually think the Democrat party would admit they are closet socialists? Look at the last 50 years & see what the Democrat party has done to grow Government & Government dependency. You can not be that stupid can you. Everyone in the political world know that Blasio is a socialist from his past stances. WOW! Do you actually think the Democrat party would admit they are closet socialists? I wouldn't be surprised if some were. Look at the last 50 years & see what the Democrat party has done to grow Government & Government dependency. Doesn't mean they are socialist. They support what is known as a mixed economy. Democrats for the most support some level of free enterprise, much more then even the conservative and libertarian parties in Europe. You can not be that stupid can you. Ad Hominem Everyone in the political world know that Bluish is a socialist from his past stances. He could be considered a democratic socialist, although he still supports a level of free enterprise. I don't support his position but it is ridiculous to say he is a communist/socialist on the same level of the Soviet Union. Are you saying he is a communist/socialist on the same level of the Soviet Union? 1
point
There is nothing to admit because they do not follow the ideology or tenants of socialism. You really need to get a better understanding of political ideologies. Hint: MANY ideologies include some degree of "government dependence", including Classical Conservatism. And no, very, very, VERY few people "know" that he is a socialist, and those that do are wrong. 1
point
1
point
Do you understand the word semantics? Can you grasp the use of a word like Socialism and get the gist of what I'm talking about and not the exact definition from some dictionary? Can you grasp that concept or do you just like to waste our time with semantics to try and demean the argument. Any ten year old would understand that when one talks about Socialism, he is addressing a bigger more intrusive Government redistributing the wealth of it's citizens for the supposed good of the collective. 1
point
Political ideology is not Semantics just because you lack a sufficient understanding of it. You are using the world incorrectly to refer to the wrong ideology and pretending it is all semantics, which perfectly demonstrates what I am saying. Can you grasp what Socialist ideology actually is? "Any ten year old would understand that when one talks about Socialism, he is addressing a bigger more intrusive Government redistributing the wealth of it's citizens for the supposed good of the collective." That is because a ten year old would know nothing about Socialism, and wouldn't recognize that multiple ideologies espouse exactly that, including Classical Conservatism, Fascism, Communism, Socialism, Welfare Liberalism (No, not all liberalism is Welfare Liberalism), Social Democratic Theory, etc. You should educate yourself on political ideology, instead of sounding uninformed. |
