CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.
Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.
Why are you talking to yourself, Brontocraptor? It can't be due to having an intelligent conversation. Is it really so important for you to take these forums so seriously, you have to support your own narrative with fake accounts? How insane is that.
You didn’t ask a question little guy. Your response was to my post that I do not see any of his alts on this thread. Keep going though child. You’ll wind down eventually.
The last President had so many worshippers and protectors that he snuck a boatload of cash to our open enemy behind Congress' back, conveniently right as he was about to walk out the door.
Nevermind that he was protecting Hezbollah from our own intelligence agencies.
Imagine if THAT was Trump. His ass would be impeached, and he'd be in prison.
You were the idiots who demanded Bill Clinton be investigated for a blow job and Obama's birth certificate be investigated. Now you DON'T want to investigate your blatantly corrupt Fuhrer? Gee, why is that Herr Bronto? Oh that's right. Because "unlimited investigations on everyone". I would have previously thought it scientifically impossible, but indeed every sentence you type IS more stupid than the one which preceded it.
The last President had an entire party, a DOJ, an FBI, and a media bowing at his feet at all times
Have you considered that might be because the last President wasn't a rapist?
You were the idiots who demanded Bill Clinton be investigated for a blow job and Obama's birth certificate be investigated. Now you DON'T want to investigate
Oh I'm all for investigations if they are across the board. Of course in Bill's case the evidence was found quickly, and he was impeached.
In this case, here we are, over two years later....
your blatantly corrupt Fuhrer? Gee, why is that Herr Bronto?
Oh that's right. Because "unlimited investigations on everyone". I would have previously thought it scientifically impossible, but indeed every sentence you type IS more stupid than the one which preceded it.
Then just look at your own sentences. They are always stupider than mine. Probably why I made it in life while you struggle and gripe about it.
The last President had an entire party, a DOJ, an FBI, and a media bowing at his feet at all times
Have you considered that might be because the last President wasn't a rapist?
Not according to Larry Sinclair. According to Larry he was even in gay orgies, a murderer, and a drug dealer.
When they are against Democrats. Thanks for demonstrating the disingenuous lunacy of your double standards, Adolf.
Of course in Bill's case the evidence was found quickly
Oh, I SEE. So now you're all for "unlimited investigations" (strange as you weren't just a moment ago) provided the evidence is found "quickly"?
Bwahahahahahahaha!
Has anybody sat you down and explained the difference between searching for evidence of a blow job and searching for evidence of an international conspiracy involving two world leaders and dozens of middle men?
Oh, I SEE. So now you're all for "unlimited investigations" (strange as you weren't just a moment ago) provided the evidence is found "quickly"?
I'm for investigations based off of evidence that already exists. Not investigations based on evidence that still can't be found after 2 years of digging.
Has anybody sat you down and explained the difference between searching for evidence of a blow job and searching for evidence of an international conspiracy involving two world leaders and dozens of middle men?
Yeah. It's called Chinagate. Libs didn't care even a little.
Dummy did you miss that the Liar said he did not have sex with that woman but his DNA must have gotten on that Blue Dress mysteriously!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nobody believes your side actually cares about cheerleader chairmen because everyone knows your side doesn’t care about Attorney General wingmen. Everyone also knows your side will pretend to care about past wrongdoings only after they are no longer politically relevant. “Damn that rapist Clinton (20 years too late), and GO HILLARY!...oh wait, she’s old news now? She was just awful.”
But when packaged as a complete volume, the report delivers on its promise to analyze the entire debacle so the risk of a future disaster is reduced. On the question of how Clinton and the Obama administration reacted, we see more than enough evidence to reaffirm our opinion that the secretary of state failed a crucial chance to show decisive, principled leadership.
The crux of it is that during and well after the chaos of the attacks on the State Department's outpost and nearby CIA annex in Benghazi, Clinton and the Obama administration promoted a false narrative for public consumption: that the violence came from a spontaneous outburst of mob anger. Although Clinton confided to her daughter, Chelsea, in an email that night that an al-Qaida faction was responsible, for two weeks she let fester the story that mob action, not a planned assault her department might have anticipated, killed her employees.
The supposition Clinton and others held to was that the attacks were related in nature to political protests the same day outside the U.S. Embassy in Cairo. Those demonstrators were angry about an anti-Islam video. With the Benghazi attacks still unfolding, Clinton released the administration's only statement on the evening of Sept. 11, and she focused on the video. But the next day, Clinton told Egyptian Prime Minister Hesham Kandil, "We know that the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack — not a protest."
How Republicans blew it on Benghazi
What she told Kandil was true, the report confirms: The Americans came under sudden attack at their compound by a force of about 70 heavily armed men. The only warning: the sudden disappearance of a Libyan police vehicle. Attackers approached the building, invaded and set fire to it. Stevens and Smith died in the fire. Doherty and Woods were killed in a subsequent attack on the CIA annex.
As hours and days passed, the report shows, inaccurate accounts of the Benghazi timeline inexplicably endured. On Sept. 14, White House spokesman Jay Carney said: "We have no information to suggest that it was a preplanned attack. The unrest we've seen around the region has been in reaction to a video that Muslims, many Muslims find offensive."
The administration looked for an official to go on the Sunday morning talk shows Sept. 16. Ben Rhodes, President Barack Obama's deputy national security adviser, sent a request to Clinton but never heard back. The thankless job fell to Susan Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the U.N. Rice had little knowledge of the events.
It was a catchy political pitch and a chance to calm nerves about his dramatic and complicated plan to bring historic change to America’s health insurance system.
"If you like your health care plan, you can keep it," President Barack Obama said -- many times -- of his landmark new law.
But the promise was impossible to keep.
So this fall, as cancellation letters were going out to approximately 4 million Americans, the public realized Obama’s breezy assurances were wrong.
Boiling down the complicated health care law to a soundbite proved treacherous, even for its promoter-in-chief. Obama and his team made matters worse, suggesting they had been misunderstood all along. The stunning political uproar led to this: a rare presidential apology.
For all of these reasons, PolitiFact has named "If you like your health care plan, you can keep it," the Lie of the Year for 2013. Readers in a separate online poll overwhelmingly agreed with the choice. (PolitiFact first announced its selection on CNN's The Lead with Jake Tapper.)
SUPER STUPID you IDIOTS believe in LIES and Politifact exposed it
SUPER STUPID where was your PET AFRICAN from CNN known as Don Lemon at as your list of NIGGERS lied to you ??????? You IDIOTS will swallow anything as long as you are lied tooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DUDE what up with Fast and Furious ????? Speak up STUPID what you got to say ? Do not run and hide you BITCH stand and fight after all you are a VET !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Tea party groups that say they were unfairly scrutinized by the Internal Revenue Service can now apply for financial compensation, in what is shaping up to be the closing chapter of a long-running fight between conservatives and the agency that dates back to the early years of the Obama administration.
Conservative-leaning organizations sued the federal government after a 2013 report from the Treasury inspector general found that the IRS was slow to approve nonprofit status for groups with “Tea Party” in their title.
After a multiyear legal battle, the Justice Department settled with the conservative groups last October. Earlier this month, a judge gave preliminary approval to a $3.5 million settlement between the department and a class-action lawsuit against the government launched on behalf of more than 400 groups.
Do you support investigating next Democrat President to make sure they're clean?
Hello bront:
Nahhh... Not to make SURE they're clean.. One would assume that.. But, if there's a flicker of wrongdoing, even just a hint, you betcha.. You know, like if they fired the FBI director and told Lester Hold that he did it to end the Russia investigation.. If he DID that, he SHOULD be investigated.
Nahhh... Not to make SURE they're clean.. One would assume that.. But, if there's a flicker of wrongdoing, even just a hint, you betcha.. You know, like if they fired the FBI director and told Lester Hold that he did it to end the Russia investigation.. If he DID that, he SHOULD be investigated.
Cool. If you watch the whole video, it's not what he said, and he even mentions the letter by Rosenstein to fire Comey.
If all you need is a hint, you ready to go after Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff and Corey Booker? We got way more than hints of corruption while in office. They might as well be working for the big businesses libs claim to hate so much...
BITCH do not run and cry because your fuckin party attacks Christianity and when i attack you i am attacking your party ! BITCH you signed up for it and you signed up for name calling and if you fuckin cannot handle the game then get the fuck out because i have made it clear i am going to fuck with you and the likes of you !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yeah. You see how thy isn’t the same as firing him to stop an investigation right? Comey told Trump that he wasn’t currently being investigated and Trump told him to make that statement public. Comey got fired because he wouldn’t. Trump’s mistake was not firing Comey earlier. Regardless, the firing is not indicative in any way of obstruction. It had no effect, and no reason to expect it would have an effect, on the investigation.
It’s funny that they called it the lie of the year in 2017 when 3 years later the investigation gives us less reason than ever to think the Russians had a significant impact, much less that Trump and Putin were working together. When the investigation is released as a big nothing, will you be glad Trump didn’t collude, or sad that he didn’t collude?