CreateDebate


Debate Info

49
16
Yes No
Debate Score:65
Arguments:51
Total Votes:76
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes (34)
 
 No (12)

Debate Creator

WildTuna(12) pic



Do you support investigating next Democrat President to make sure they're clean?

 

Yes

Side Score: 49
VS.

No

Side Score: 16

Sure, why not...

Let's just investigate anybody and everybody that steps in the Whitehouse. I think we should use THIS as our first standard with each one.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist ControlActof1954

Side: Yes
Goldtop(167) Disputed
2 points

Why are you talking to yourself, Brontocraptor? It can't be due to having an intelligent conversation. Is it really so important for you to take these forums so seriously, you have to support your own narrative with fake accounts? How insane is that.

Side: No
Amarel(4910) Clarified
0 points

I don’t see his alt accounts in this thread. .

Side: Yes
excon(12378) Disputed
1 point

Let's just investigate anybody and everybody that steps in the Whitehouse.

Hello again, bront:

Let's DO that.. In fact, it's congress's JOB to oversee the president.. You can CALL it investigate if it makes you feel better..

Of course, you don't KNOW this, because the last chairman of the intelligence committee thought his job was cheerleader for the president..

excon

Side: No
3 points

The last President had so many worshippers and protectors that he snuck a boatload of cash to our open enemy behind Congress' back, conveniently right as he was about to walk out the door.

Nevermind that he was protecting Hezbollah from our own intelligence agencies.

Imagine if THAT was Trump. His ass would be impeached, and he'd be in prison.

Side: Yes
2 points

Let's DO that.. In fact, it's congress's JOB to oversee the president.. You can CALL it investigate if it makes you feel better..

Cool. So unlimited investigations on everyone. I'll guarantee my side has less skeletons than yours. Go ahead. Make my day.

Of course, you don't KNOW this, because the last chairman of the intelligence committee thought his job was cheerleader for the president..

Right. The last President had an entire party, a DOJ, an FBI, and a media bowing at his feet at all times like Gozer worshippers.

Side: Yes
Amarel(4910) Clarified
1 point

Nobody believes your side actually cares about cheerleader chairmen because everyone knows your side doesn’t care about Attorney General wingmen. Everyone also knows your side will pretend to care about past wrongdoings only after they are no longer politically relevant. “Damn that rapist Clinton (20 years too late), and GO HILLARY!...oh wait, she’s old news now? She was just awful.”

Side: Yes
outlaw60(14510) Disputed
1 point

SUPER STUPID where was all the oversight on your PET NEGRO OBAMA ?????????

Side: Yes
outlaw60(14510) Disputed
1 point

SUPER STUPID when the game you LEFTIST put in play comes back to ya well you little bitches will be squealing

Side: Yes
1 point

I think we should investigate any president who pays hush money to prostitutes.

Side: Yes
1 point

Do you support investigating next Democrat President to make sure they're clean?

Hello bront:

Nahhh... Not to make SURE they're clean.. One would assume that.. But, if there's a flicker of wrongdoing, even just a hint, you betcha.. You know, like if they fired the FBI director and told Lester Hold that he did it to end the Russia investigation.. If he DID that, he SHOULD be investigated.

Dude!

excon

Side: No
5 points

Nahhh... Not to make SURE they're clean.. One would assume that.. But, if there's a flicker of wrongdoing, even just a hint, you betcha.. You know, like if they fired the FBI director and told Lester Hold that he did it to end the Russia investigation.. If he DID that, he SHOULD be investigated.

Cool. If you watch the whole video, it's not what he said, and he even mentions the letter by Rosenstein to fire Comey.

If all you need is a hint, you ready to go after Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff and Corey Booker? We got way more than hints of corruption while in office. They might as well be working for the big businesses libs claim to hate so much...

Side: Yes
1 point

Cool. If you watch the whole video, it's not what he said

Cool. Just like he didn't say grab women by the pussy either.

DUDE!

Side: No
2 points

If colluding with Russians against the opposition is a crime, tell me what this is.

https://youtu.be/zyu6iaxX6fI

https://youtu.be/j1LLsffYH3E

Hey look! It's Adam Schiff trying to get compromising info on Trump from the Russian government. Not guessing he did. We have the tape.

You want an investigation, or you good?

Side: Yes
outlaw60(14510) Disputed
1 point

SUPER STUPID cannot believe a president can fire an FBI director ????????????

Side: Yes
Pedestrian(154) Disputed
1 point

Sure he can and particularly if [he] is out to obstruct justice. Now that's a crime...just like Nixon.

Side: No
outlaw60(14510) Disputed
1 point

SUPER STUPID there is no doubt that the NIGGER Lester Holt show be involved in any investigation of a Presidential Candidate !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Side: Yes
Amarel(4910) Clarified
-1 points

if they fired the FBI director and told Lester Hold that he did it to end the Russia investigation

That didn’t happen.

Side: Yes
excon(12378) Clarified
1 point

That didn’t happen.

Hello A:

He told Lester Holt, that he fired Comey because "This Russia thing with Trump and Russia is a made-up story"

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2017/dec/12/2017-lie-year-russian-election-interference-made-s/

excon

Side: Yes