CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.
Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.
The left's move to moral relativism has made that impossible. You cannot create agreed upon standards if everything is simply relative rather than objective.
The left's move to moral relativism has made that impossible. You cannot create agreed upon standards if everything is simply relative rather than objective.
But morality isn't objective you retard. Pretending it is when it isn't just makes you stupid.
What you Nazi nutballs want is for your own self-contradictory interpretation of morality to be considered objective.
What you Nazi nutballs want is for your own self-contradictory interpretation of morality to be considered objective.
Not actually. We simply refuse to be ridiculed by people who think ridicule of relative things is nonsensical relatively, while ridiculing us on relative things, and demanding that we cohere to their own relative view that they admit is completely relative...
To make a claim that feeding babies battery acid is wrong is an objective moral fact
The universe doesn't care though, reality itself doesn't care. Sure, it's not a very nice thing to do but there is no objective morality just because it offends your sensibilities so much that it just HAS to be objectively wrong boo hoo you're a right wing pussy.
Sure, it's not a very nice thing to do but there is no objective morality just because it offends your sensibilities so much that it just HAS to be objectively wrong boo hoo you're a right wing pussy.
I never mentioned the Universe caring or reality caring , I stated it’s an objective moral fact offence or otherwise doesn’t come into it , you need to work on your logic buddy
I never mentioned the Universe caring or reality caring
You don't get the point dumb ass, morality can't be objective because the literal only ones who care about it are subjective beings that construct codes of morality in there mother fucking subjective brains. You are a retarded basket of fanny holes.
Why do you always get so upset?😭 is it because I destroy your arguments from the first encounter with a mere dismissive wave of my hand ?🖐
morality can't be objective because the literal only ones who care about it are subjective beings that construct codes of morality in there mother fucking subjective brains.
You don’t understand what the term objective morality even means , let us continue your education there is a distinction between objective and absolute morality, you see every time someone mentions objective morality you seem to think they’re referring to a god , if you wish to bring god into it kindly use correct terminology as in Authoritative Morality.......What? You’re welcome yet again 👌☺️👻
Why do you spend all day telling other people that they are upset?
I don’t, I just upset you because you are ......upset , if you start a new thread I promise to make you upset again by beating you again. All day? Translation.....Nom spends all day calling everyone stooopid and a Nazi then he spends all night opening new accounts and downvoting
But you don't understand basic English grammar, which makes it HILARIOUS when you try to "educate" other people.
Translation.....You’re beaten again
Let us continue your education by teaching you about something called a full stop (i.e. period).
Get the full stop police 👮♀️ immediately
He literally didn't mention God once in either passage you quoted.
You mean you as in your alt account , you didn’t have to Doofus the morality you referenced is the very definition of Authoritative you clown .....try and keep up
you brought God into it. Either that or you quoted the wrong passages
Read above Doofus
Why are you so stupid Jody? You just have absolutely nothing even half-resembling a point.
You are quite obviously mentally ill, are you not?
you didn’t have to Doofus
Yes, when you attack someone for bringing God into it, they must actually have brought God into it. That's how it works, you astonishingly stupid child.
Yes, when you attack someone for bringing God into it, they must actually have brought God into it. That's how it works, you astonishingly stupid child.
In your case, when you say "God", you mean the Lord of the flies...
If morality isn't objective then how can you argue that anyone should or shouldn't do anything?
If musical taste is subjective how can you listen to music? If culinary taste is subjective how can you eat? If philosophy is subjective how can you think? If art is subjective how can you find anything beautiful or see meaning in anything?
The fact that taste is subjective is completely aside from the point. If there is nothing objectively right or wrong then you can't argue that, for example, the rich should give money to the poor. Why should they if it isn't the right thing to do?
The fact that taste is subjective is completely aside from the point. If there is nothing objectively right or wrong then you can't argue that, for example, the rich should give money to the poor. Why should they if it isn't the right thing to do?
Why shouldn't we redistribute wealth if it's not the wrong thing to do?
In that case, there's no reason that you shouldn't but also no reason that you should. In other words, you still can't argue that we should redistribute wealth since it's morally equivalent to not redistributing wealth.
The left's move to moral relativism has made that impossible. You cannot create agreed upon standards if everything is simply relative rather than objective.
Hello bront:
Nahhh..
I dunno HOW you miss so much...
This has NOTHING to do with good or evil.. It has NOTHING to do with liberal or conservative.. It has everything to do with the SCIENCE of anthropology - you know, the thing you learned in church.. Evolution played a role too..
It's SIMPLE, really.. When homo sapiens came down from the trees, they GOT that murdering others DOESN'T work if you're trying to CIVILIZE yourselves..
They knew NOTHING about good or evil.. They knew NOTHING about right or left.. They KNEW what worked, and did it.. We're STILL trying to do it..
By "miss", do you mean that I can correlate that if conservatives are bad relative to liberal standards, Islam is Nazism relative to Liberal standards? Or did you mean when I laughed like a hyena years ago at "Russian collusion"...
Or perhaps you meant when I correlate that the same anti civil rights Democratic Party of yesteryear has simply switched its targets to Jews and Conservative Christians because demonizing and propogating some group as worthy of death is how the Democratic Party survives...
Yes. As a centrist, I see no need for the false dichotomy of the left and the right........................................................................................................
The left and right will never work together in the long run, notice how the second there is the slightest ideological divide the country degenerates into either ideological or literal civil war. The US was always meant to maintain the same basic structure, the parties would have their disagreements but at the end of the day still support the same system of government and economics. Now however, you have actual leftists i.e social democrats such as Bernie Sanders, and far right wingers in the parties.
