CreateDebate


Debate Info

22
26
Yes No
Debate Score:48
Arguments:51
Total Votes:57
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes (15)
 
 No (17)

Debate Creator

DrawFour(2661) pic



Does SitaraMusica seem to know what she is talking about?

Direct quote from SitaraMusica

"I know what I am talking about" on this debate.

Please defend your arguments with supporting evidence, direct quotes  and linsk to them would be appreciated.

Yes

Side Score: 22
VS.

No

Side Score: 26
4 points

Sometimes she does.

Side: Yes

Why are you making a drama debate when I was polite with you and admitted that I need to do better? At least you are nice enough to let me post. I said I was going to do better and I meant it. :(

Side: Yes
Atrag(5123) Disputed
1 point

I said I was going to do better and I meant it. :(

You have said that many many times before. Almost as many times as you've been banned.

Side: No
DrawFour(2661) Clarified
1 point

It's not 'drama' i assure you, it's reason and logic to refute a claim you made.

Side: Yes
SitaraMusica(536) Clarified
1 point

I am not posting anything about you, so this is not justified.

Side: Yes
1 point

Hate monger!

Side: Yes
DrawFour(2661) Clarified
1 point

What here shows hate?

Side: Yes
2 points

I'd say, debate with her and you'll have your answer, but to save you the trouble, and to uphold my word in the description, I'll find direct quotes and link to them showing she does not know what she is talking about.

I refer you to argument one, she said:

"I misunderstood what you said. I read the whole thing now. I agree."

What this shows, is one of many of her misunderstandings that indicate she will argue on, even when she does not understand. With that in mind, what's to say she ever understands? I'd also like to point out some incriminating words she used specifically. "I read the whole thing now". It's as clear as day that she made the mistake of responding to an argument, either asking questions, or making assumptions, when she did not even first read that argument. Someone who knew how to debate would not make that mistake, at least I like to think so.

Next I take you to a debate she titled herself. It's in fact the very debate I just showed you.

"Does the fetus have rights?"

What draws attention to this debate, is that it is titled in a manner that asks a simple question, a question that has one answer that can easily be searched, with no need for discussion. In the description... there is nothing, so we only have to go off of the debate's title.

It's a small mistake, asking "does" when you mean "should" anyone could make it. However when confronted about said mistake, here she first disputed by saying

"No, I am asking if the fetus does have rights. I feel that the fetus is a person." using the words "I feel" clearly indicating she made this debate as a way to get opinions, but disputed me because she was upset. The argument I linked to, was my second argument, her second argument follows, and it says even more about how she feels, and how this is her opinion, yet she refuses to accept that the debate was titled incorrectly.

This went on for some while, me pointing out her flaw, her denying it to even be a flaw, until she got upset with my refusal to play along, and banned me. I was since unbanned, so I won't be able to prove that part, but it happened out of anger at being told she's wrong.

I've show arguments that show SitaraMusica does not know what she is talking about, and I've shown a debate. The last thing I can use to back up my claim that she in fact does not know what she is talking about is how on a majority of her "yes or no" debates, the sides are labeled counter to what the debate site places them as. The site placing them, yes on left and no on right. She often switches these, the reason being very clear to me, that she is biased. So biased in fact that she will often make her position clear in the description, or in whatever link she was going to refer to being put on the side with which she agrees. This bias, and lack of respect for the proper orientations of the sides, added to the evidence in her arguments and debates, tells me pretty clearly... SitaraMusica does not know what she is talking about, and mind me for using circular logic, but to even suggest she does, shows even more lack of knowledge in what she is talking about.

Side: No
2 points

Sometimes she doesn't.

Side: No
1 point

Andy, this is the third person who has independently posted somthing like this in the last couple of weeks. Why don't you ban her? You have banned her before and she should never have been allowed to just to create another account to get round it. You know she is too stupid to get past an IP ban. Why don't you just do it? Is this really want you want your site to be like?

Side: No
DrawFour(2661) Clarified
2 points

I'm not vying to have her banned, I feel even the ignorant deserve a voice, i just also feel they should take it upon themselves to do something about their ignorance, rather that spouting it with reckless abandon.

How I formally feel is that no one should be silenced. How I personally feel is that ignoramuses need to know when to be silent.

Side: Yes
0 points

You should be banned too for calling me a rapist and saying that I deserve to be raped.

Side: Yes
Atrag(5123) Clarified
1 point

Well the fact that you keep posting nude indecent images of unborn children on this site suggest that you are a sexual deviant.

However, to reiterate, I took back what I said about you deservng to be rape - it was poorly worded. I clarified by saying you deserve a good hard slap around the head. If you don't understand that then that's your issue not mine.

Side: Yes
1 point

Argument two...

Read around this debate, you'll see more of her ignorance.

Side: No