CreateDebate


Debate Info

33
18
Wouldn't have helped During WW2
Debate Score:51
Arguments:40
Total Votes:68
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Wouldn't have helped (22)
 
 During WW2 (14)

Debate Creator

CrapWeasel(521) pic



Elizabeth Warren introduces bill to ban U.S. first-strike nuclear option

Elizabeth Warren introduces bill to ban U.S. first-strike nuclear option


https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/feb/3/elizabeth-warren-introduces-bill-ban-us-first-stri/

Wouldn't have helped

Side Score: 33
VS.

During WW2

Side Score: 18
1 point

That bitch is on my top ten list of people who need to die. The sooner, the better.

Side: Wouldn't have helped
ArchonElite(338) Disputed
1 point

That bitch is on my top ten list of people who need to die. The sooner, the better.

You're on my top ten list of potentially violent right wing terrorists who need to be detained and questioned by the FBI.

Side: During WW2
CrapWeasel(521) Disputed
2 points

Why are you scared to address the debate and retreating to ad hominems?

Side: Wouldn't have helped
Amarel(4910) Clarified
2 points

You're on my top ten list of potentially violent right wing terrorists who need to be detained and questioned by the FBI.

Awesome. So Stalin, who are the other 9 political opponents you wish to sick the NKVD on? When does your great purge begin?

Side: Wouldn't have helped
outlaw60(14512) Disputed
1 point

You're on my top ten list of potentially violent right wing terrorists who need to be detained and questioned by the FBI

Totalitarian is the response your ignorant brain typed. So according to the Totalitarian you have some connection to the FBI. Is the mole John Brennan ?????

Side: Wouldn't have helped
Chinaman(158) Disputed
1 point

Lizzy Warren has a real problem with understanding any threat to the United States.

She does not care if the United States is attacked but her twisted mind only plays to her twisted base.

Side: Wouldn't have helped
Grugore(854) Disputed
1 point

For what? Wishing that someone would die? Nothing wrong with that.

Side: Wouldn't have helped

No, I don't think a nuclear first strike is ever justified.

Side: Wouldn't have helped
outlaw60(14512) Disputed
1 point

You know much about Article 2 Section 2 ???? If so explain your stupidity !!!!!!!!!!

Side: During WW2
Grugore(854) Disputed
1 point

You would rather allow the other guy to strike first? Is that what you're saying?

Side: During WW2
Jacobcoolguy(2433) Clarified
1 point

Yes, that is what I'm saying.

Side: Wouldn't have helped

All this is is positioning herself on issues for the 2020 election. She is so transparent.

Side: Wouldn't have helped

That's like telling the Russians, "We won't strike first. Promise. You can trust us" ;)

Side: Wouldn't have helped
1 point

Do we wait for a massively more destructive nuclear version of Pearl Harbor and retaliate if we've anything left with which to retaliate?

That was a rhetorical question as only an imbecile would advocate such a suicidal policy and there are only 20 imbeciles in the United States all of whom are Elizabeth Warren.

It graphically illustrates the eye-watering lunacy of this mentally disabled halfwit who would, if permitted, advise our many enemies that they could enjoy a penalty kick in the event of hostilities.

Side: During WW2
1 point

Totally agree. For now, one of our greatest protections against nukes is the fact the we threaten to use our own nukes against anyone threatening us. Ever hear of M.A.D.? That's what kept Russia and the US from destroying all of humanity several times over.

We definitely can't send the message that "First punch is a freebie" and expect that enemies of the US will stop trying to attack or threaten us.

Side: During WW2