Enjoying Dana (Libprolifer) land?
Recently the site has been swamped with debates created by Dana in which she has no interest whatsoever in actually debating and just states what political camp she falls under over and over again. When asked to expand on her believes she can't even do that if it falls outside her catchphrases. She has been banned from this site numerous times but now it seems that Andy is letting her stay. So I wondered... what do you think? Do you enjoy having her around?
For more information from previous eras: http://www.createdebate.com/debate/show/Is_Dana_a_troll_or_just_an_idiot
Yes
Side Score: 33
|
 |
No
Side Score: 31
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.createdebate.com/debate/show/ If anyone should be banned, it should be whoever is impersonating another user in order to get them banned. It might be Cuaroc? Side: Yes
So, here is the irony of the situation and why i have not banned her again. 1. With Dana here (not Prodigy), her debates and argument activity create a significant amount of additional activity. This activity drives higher Google Adsense revenue (almost double) which help me pay for the site (it currently costs me money every month). 2. There are many people who create debates and arguments that are not quality. If you don't like their/her debates or arguments, don't spend time on them. 3. I don't think she "hurts" the site. I would appreciate everyone's tolerance of all people on this site. We ban spammers, trolls, members who threaten other members, people who put pornography up, etc. Almost everyone is allowed a warning. Andy Side: Yes
People create debates on this site expecting to be able to debate. Instead they get someone that calls their political views bigotry and then just repeats the same line. New members sometimes write many paragraphs trying to explain something to her just for her to say, at best, "you're entitled to your opinion :)". At worst she just repeats almost word for word what she said the first time while insulting you. Her behaviour would be the perfect example of a troll if she werent too stupid to realise it. As for spam.. how many times now has she posted the debate "does life begin at fertilisation?" Side: No
I have not seen Libprolifer attack anyone yet. I have seen much worse behavior from plenty of other users. If I were the admin, I would be banning a lot of other users before banning some active user who contributes to the community. Just because Dana's arguments are not up to Atrag's or other user's standards does not mean she should be banned. This call to action to ban another user is definitely worse than anything I have seen Libprolifer do. Then again, I am new to this site. Side: Yes
1
point
1
point
|
1
point
0
points
0
points
It is not the fact you disagree. It is the fact you debate like a mong. You repeat the same worn out phrases as excuses for arguments again and again. You clearly dodge points of the oppositions argument that you can't refute and instead mention something irrelevant. You don't understand what a fact is. You create debates with identical meanings almost immediately after each other. You make simple statements about your stance which aren't arguments that can be debated. For example the argument you submitted on the death penalty debate was just "I oppose the death penalty", you didn't even argue why it was bad until asked to.You say really ridiculous things which go against common knowledge e.g. "England is a monarchy, not a democracy" and "There is no such thing as a constitutional monarchy. There are many valid reasons why people are getting cross and tired with you, and it is not just that people are disagreeing with you. Side: No
0
points
0
points
|
