'Environmentalism is a lost cause in our consumerist world.' Discuss.
Is a lost cause
Side Score: 9
|
![]() |
Not a lost cause
Side Score: 14
|
|
|
|
|
The fact is this - many people around the world are changing their electronic gadgets like clothes because they have to keep up with the Joneses. It is no surprise that the electronic trash that we have accumulated could easily fill a small state like Singapore. 342 days ago | Side: Is a lost cause
People enjoy consuming meat and dairy and it is an essential part of every single one of our meals. However, consuming such food products actually is detrimental to the environment. 1 Factory farms produce massive amounts of dust and other contamination that pollutes our air. A study in Texas found that animal feedlots in the state produce more than 14 million pounds of particulate dust every year and that the dust 'contains biologically active organisms such as bacteria, mold, and fungi from the feces and the feed.' 2 According to the nonprofit group Greenpeace, all the wild animals and trees in more than 2.9 million acres of rainforest were destroyed in the 2004-2005 crop season in order to grow crops that are used to feed chickens and other animals in factory farms. 3 According to a 2006 UN report, the livestock sector causes more greenhouse gases worldwide than the entire transportation sector. 4 Nitrous oxide is about 300 times more potent as a global warming gas than carbon dioxide. According to the U.N., the meat, egg, and dairy industries account for a staggering 65 percent of worldwide nitrous oxide emissions. 5 According to the Environmental Protection Agency, the run-off from factory farms pollutes our waterways more than all other industrial sources combined. The EPA reports that chicken, hog, and cattle excrement have polluted 35,000 miles of rivers in 22 states and contaminated groundwater in 17 states. 6 It takes 16 pounds of grain and 2,500 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of meat. One average meat eater could consume that pound of meat during a meal, while 16 people could have been fed on the grain it takes to produce that pound of meat. 7 The meat industry causes more water pollution in the US than all other industries combined because the animals raised for food produce 130 times more excrement than the entire human population--86,000 lbs per second. A typical pig factory farm generates a quantity of raw waste equal to that of a city of 12,000 people. 8 Every 2 seconds, a child starves to death somewhere in the world. Countries such as Ethiopia and some Central American countries use their farmland to supply the United States with cheap burgers instead of growing healthful grain foods for their own starving people. 9 The livestock population of the US consumes enough grain and soybeans to feed more than 5 times its human population. 90% of all corn and 80% of all grains and beans grown in the US are used to feed livestock animals. 10. 75 percent of U.S. topsoil has been lost to date, 85 percent of that loss is due to livestock rearing. "you can't be a meat eating environmentalist"
342 days ago | Side: Is a lost cause
In our consumerist world, many large corporations all aim for profit maximization. However, many environmentally friendly products, "green products" are in fact more expensive to produce compared to non-environmentally friendly products. This is because green products require higher technology in production and more research and development invested into the product. Therefore corporations would chose not to produce green products, in order to keep cost of productions low.For example, a green detergent, Seventh generation comes in at $0.14 per fluid ounce. However all non-green detergent, such as 2X Concentrated Laundry Detergent costs around only $0.09 fluid per ounce. Since most consumers would purchase the cheaper products, companies feel that they are losing out on the competition if they were to produce green products, continuing to produce products with toxic substances and pollutants, worsening the environments condition. Another disincentive for companies to produce green products is reducing the pollutants in by-products, companies incur additional cost, and the costs is not low. Therefore corporations would have little incentive to go green. 342 days ago | Side: Is a lost cause
consumers are more self-centered in today's world so they are more concerned over focusing on their social status and they do not think about the consequences of throwing away old items in favour of newer products. they choose to ignore the fact that other people are suffering because of their actions 342 days ago | Side: Is a lost cause
developing countries are focused on their development and they do not have the technology and the budget to invest in R&D;for environmentally friendly production methods. on the other hand, developed countries are profit maximsing and they do not wish to invest in more money just to innovate green products as they usually have a higher production cost than normal products. eg: the kyoto protocol requiring at least 55 parties to ratify the agreement and for the total of those parties emissions to be at least 55% of global production of greenhouse gases 169 countries have ratified the agreement. Of the signatories, only 2 refused to ratify Kyoto up until December of 2007 - Australia and the USA Claussen spent the next five years working as the lead U.S. climate negotiator to convert the Rio framework into a treaty with legally binding greenhouse gas targets. She says the major obstacle to international agreement quickly became clear – economic interests, especially in the developing nations like China, India, and Brazil. 342 days ago | Side: Is a lost cause
|
In our consumerist world, enviornmentalism is not a lost cause because without environmental protection, the natural resources would be depleted and the cost of raw materials will increase drastically. This will have a large impact on consumers because it will increases the cost of goods. They will strongly object to this because they will no longer be able to consume the same amount of goods as before, and therefore they will appreciate the importance of environmentalism. 342 days ago | Side: Not a lost cause
Individuals is not a lost cause. Though with consumerism, people are purchasing more and more goods, there have been a greater need in caring for the environment at the same time. Companies are increasing their emphasis on producing environmentally friendly products. This because people have understood the importance of caring for the environment and hence would choose to support companies that are produce eco-friendly products. Products on the other hand which are harmful to the environment would be less supported by the people. 342 days ago | Side: Not a lost cause
2
points
I POST WRONG SIDE SHOULD BE THE OTHER SIDE. "When the last tree is cut down, when the last river is poisoned, when the last fish is caught then will we realise that we cannot eat money." Aptly quoted from the Cree Indians, we can see that in our consumerist world, we no longer care about the environment anymore. Consumerism causes the wasteful use of energy and material far above and beyond that needed for everyday living at a comfortable level. We exploit our limited resources to meet our unlimited wants. 220 Billion cans, bottles, plastic cartons and paper cups, are thrown away each year in the "developed" world. Burying would result in land pollution, and burning, air pollution. 342 days ago | Side: Not a lost cause
Environmentalism is not a lost cause in our consumerist world, this is because governments would intervene. Governments understand that as affluence increase, there would be greater amount of goods demanded. Governments would work together to increase environmental standards between the companies and even between countries. Governments are also pursuing new ways to continue to improve the environment such as seeking new forms of renewable energy. 342 days ago | Side: Not a lost cause
companies realise that they have to engage in corporate social responsibility to gain a larger consumer base as people in the developed world are increasingly aware of how harmful certain industrial practicdes can be. one such example is The Body Shop where they have recently launched a cruelty free makeup line (Lily Cole range). they promote the range as environmentally friendly as they do not conduct testing on animals hence reducing cruelty to animals and adhering to their motto of beauty without cruelty. 342 days ago | Side: Not a lost cause
The burden of environmentalism should be left to the consumer, but they should be part of it. The burden should be split among raw material provider, manufacturer, distributor, retailer and consumer. If all of the participants in the value/supply chain take a portion of the responsibility (cost), and don't pass it along, then everyone will be fairly treated and should be expected to participate. 341 days ago | Side: Not a lost cause
|


