#1 |
#2 |
#3 |
Paste this URL into an email or IM: |
Click here to send this debate via your default email application.
|
Click here to login and CreateDebate will send an email for you.
|
Ever Considered Publishing a Book at Some Point?
| Add New Argument |
|
2
points
Yes. I want to write a book which explains how humanity can reach a type one civilization, and I want to write another which attempts to explain the entire universe (which isn't possible but I can try). I also want to write a giant series of novels and have them adapted into films or a TV series. @MichioKaku To be clear, in the modern era with Self-Publishing available, you certainly can produce books for public consumption on any given topic that one is capable of and potentially be quite successful. If you have not looked into self-publishing before, you may be interested to read into stories of such Authors who use Amazon as their gateway. @Rusticus Best of luck. If you do publish your work and we are still both around the forum, feel free to make a Thread advertising the book as I for one would be interested in reading it. Now, when you say 'print', are you including e-book publication or are you referring strictly to paperback/hardback? What I'd like to do is find a writer/historian to help me do more research and verify what I already believe to be true and then write the book with or without my help. I'm no writer but what I do have is information. I don't care who writes it, I just want the story to be told. If western movies were in fashion it would make a great one but I'm not expecting that to ever happen. This was the Ward massacre of 1854 which was a particularly brutal massacre, maybe the worst of the entire Oregon trail era. The Oregon trail was shut down for at least two years and the army's retribution for the massacre kicked off several Northwest Indian wars. @Rusticus What I'd like to do is find a writer/historian to help me do more research and verify what I already believe to be true and then write the book with or without my help. If interested, you could reach out to local Community College (or State School) Professors in the relevant disciplines via email as they may be interested in the project. Also, you may want to post this as a Thread topic on the following Forums: (A) Historum.com (B) Stack Exchange (C) Quora If you branched out sufficiently, it is very possible you could find a qualified person (or multiple) interested in collaborating with you on the project I've already done it. My first published essay came out through the University Press last year Which of of your 31 names did you sign it in ? Your claim is highly dubious as you cannot type a chapter without resorting to lying also you have the “ intelligence “ of a pot plant which makes your claim even more fantastical Which of of your 31 names did you sign it in ? I only have one name, you infant. Your claim is highly dubious I literally couldn't give a shit what you think because you're an angry little moron with no talent at anything except making yourself look like an angry little moron. without resorting to lying The only liar here is you. Fuck off, retard. I only have one name , you infant Which clearly demonstrates how easily you lie I literally couldn’t give a shit what you think Which is why you’re answering me you English twat because you’re an angry little moron Says an English twat who doesn’t know what philosophy is The only liar here is you Says the English wanker with 31 accounts fuck off , retard The truth really does hurt you doesn’t it ? Published author indeed 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Which clearly demonstrates how easily you lie I am not lying. I have one name which has three words in it, you hilariously stupid little child. Which is why you’re answering me You didn't ask me a question so no, I am not answering you. I am informing you that you are a malicious little toad with the intellect of a mildly retarded goat. Says the English wanker with 31 accounts I don't have 31 accounts, hence proving that you are a liar. You quite literally made that number up and since you have no way of knowing how many accounts I do or don't have, everybody who reads this knows that you are a liar. The truth really does hurt you doesn’t it ? The truth is that you are a retard, and hence I would like you to fuck off. Your sole ambition is to upset other people, which makes you a piece of shit who is not worth giving the time of day to. Your own life is obviously a complete failure, you are almost certainly either an alcoholic or a drug addict, and all you appear to be interested in is taking out your own mistakes and failures on other people. You are simply a waste of oxygen, buddy. I am not not lying. I have one name which has three words in it, you hilariously stupid little child. You are , you do it in every post , you have 31 different names on here you English twat you didn’t ask me a question so no , I am not answering you Which is why you answered me you twat I am informing you that you are a malicious little toad with the intellect of a mildly retarded goat But I’m not the one who believes 9 / 11 was an inside job or that Karl Marx who never held a job in his life was actually an “ academic “ and tireless friend of the working classes I don’t have 31 accounts Yet you spend hours every day downvoting everyone who disagrees with your lunacy , using your 31 alt accounts you are almost certainly an alcoholic or drug addict Says the English wanker who admitted to both addictions only last week , you truly are a dim -witted brute who’s the sites football as we all kick your English butt around , now off with you , log out and back in with your alt accounts to start downvoting as you’re in your usual rage aren’t you ? @Nomenclature You have absolutely no idea what Dermot is, because this is the internet, not a job interview. If this is true, then why did you take it upon yourself to create a Thread centered around you ostensible profession as a Science Journalist in order to establish authority in the area? Quite hypocritical of you, no? Nom, have you considered not everyone is nearly as fundamentally dishonest as you, and therefore I have some supportive reasons to believe Dermot's fundamental claim(s) in this respect? i.e. I have no reason to suppose that Dermot is a pathological liar--which, he would need to be in order to fabricate a Profession (and such) Clearly not a successful one I’ve done pretty well and continue to do so , jealous aren’t you ? You have absolutely no idea what Dermot is But a real man only has his word and that’s good enough for honorable people , this is an alien concept to you as you’re without honour and a compulsive liar Hi Mint , I’ve worked really hard to get to this stage where I’m pretty free to do as I wish with my day I wasn't aware that signing on every two weeks counts as "hard work" in Ireland, Dermot. I'll at least give you some credit for claiming to be something you need absolutely no brains to be. At least you can better align your lie with the reality of the situation, hence making it more believable. Lol. I wasn't aware that signing on every two weeks counts as "hard work" in Ireland, Dermot. You’re still clearly upset I nailed the lie that you claimed to be a published author I'll at least give you some credit for claiming to be something you need absolutely no brains to be. I’m not the one claiming to be an author which you’re not At least you can better align your lie with the reality of the situation I don’t lie you do though as most on C D know as you claim you only have one account yet everyone knows that’s a lie making you a compulsive liar 10
points
0
points
Lie is all that NumberOne does. FactMachine, you have no right to even be posting on this website because you have been banned. The site owner banned you because you are a malicious troll who spends his entire day spamming other users with offensive personal messages, and when you are not doing that you are spamming the board itself. Nobody cares what you think, least of all me. Not even your parents care what you think. I am very sure in fact that they regret their mistake and the worthless troll it has become. @Nomenclature I'll at least give you some credit for claiming to be something you need absolutely no brains to be. Actually, creativity is the fundamental Human cognitive ability which seems to separate us from the other animals in many respects. Ever wonder why ancient cave paintings are so awe-inspiring? Ideally, it would be excellent to have a society full of Artists, Scientists, Philosophers, ect. in various disciplines. -1
points
@Nomentard Creativity is not measured on any standard IQ test This speaks more as to the limitations of the IQ test than to the necessitation of the shutting up procedure being initiated on mathfan. I would rather say that it is you my dear cunt muffin, who shall be shutting up. As anyone with a cerebral cortex the size size of my left testicle can see, creativity is clearly a cognitive ability which IQ test(icles) can't measure. Which means that you are stupid because you don't think creativity is cognitive because it can't be measured on an IQ test. This speaks more as to the limitations of the IQ test Oh my God, just why are you so stupid? You tried to convince us that a Subway "sandwich artist" has greater cognitive ability that a university math professor because he makes a creative baloney baguette. For once in your fucking stupid, miserably delusional life, accept that you are wrong. You really should shut up you dumb English twat and let your betters attempt to educate you ..... An impossible task I know but I’m a charitable person "Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited, whereas imagination embraces the entire world, stimulating progress, giving birth to evolution." -Albert Einstein, What Life Means to Einstein (1929) Ouch , that’s gotta hurt Nom 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 I don’t know what makes you so spectacularly stupid but it’s working , you really ought to stop trying to pompously hold forth on things you know nothing about . Let’s see what Einstein has to say on the matter of creativity , "The greatest scientists are artists as well," said Albert Einstein (Calaprice, 2000, 245). As one of the greatest physicists of all time and a fine amateur pianist and violinist, he ought to have known! So what did Einstein mean and what does it tell us about the nature of creative thinking and how we should stimulate it? In our last post, we suggested that community singing might be a simple way to introduce creativity into one's life. In the post before that Einstein's musical hobbies served as an example of personal creativity providing the kind of recreation that enables professional innovation. And in an even earlier post on Einstein, we introduced the idea that creative thinking can be done with your body as well as your mind. In this essay, we want to link all these themes through Einstein's experience to suggest that the daily practice of music might actually stimulate not only everyday creativity, but genius-level creativity as well. For Einstein, insight did not come from logic or mathematics. It came, as it does for artists, from intuition and inspiration. As he told one friend, "When I examine myself and my methods of thought, I come close to the conclusion that the gift of imagination has meant more to me than any talent for absorbing absolute knowledge." Elaborating, he added, "All great achievements of science must start from intuitive knowledge. I believe in intuition and inspiration.... At times I feel certain I am right while not knowing the reason." Thus, his famous statement that, for creative work in science, "Imagination is more important than knowledge" (Calaprice, 2000, 22, 287, 10). Oh dear , talk your way out of that or just go into your usual rage and downvote I don’t know what makes you so spectacularly stupid but it’s working On the contrary, you demonstrably lack the intelligence to have calculated the odds of somebody realising that you have plagiarised your insult from the internet. This line is so old and overused that quite literally only an idiot would attempt to pass it off as his own. Furthermore, all you are doing by attacking me is proving my point that you spend all your time here attacking other members with stolen jokes and infantile rhetoric. Let’s see what Einstein has to say on the matter of creativity Unless Einstein said that creativity is the most important cognitive ability, which is the claim I refuted, then what Einstein said on the matter of creativity is completely irrelevant. "The greatest scientists are artists as well," said Albert Einstein (Calaprice, 2000, 245). As one of the greatest physicists of all time and a fine amateur pianist and violinist, he ought to have known! Ought to have known what? I didn't say creativity is not important, so you are BLATANTLY using straw man argumentation. I refuted the claim that creativity is the most important cognitive ability, because that claim is demonstrably false. The ability to learn is the most important cognitive ability, which ironically is a quality both you and MathFan lack. As always, your replies demonstrate your own unfathomable stupidity, which you attempt to project onto others out of nothing more than childish spite. You are utterly, utterly pathetic. Stop misrepresenting my arguments and shut the fuck up. Oh dear , you’re terribly upset again as you yet again are put in your place waffling on about yet another topic you know nothing about , as usual everyone including Einstein is wrong because an English twat says so 🤔 So why not run back to your new debates where you’re arguing with your alt accounts you sad troll ? "Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited, whereas imagination embraces the entire world, stimulating progress, giving birth to evolution." -Albert Einstein, What Life Means to Einstein (1929) Oh dear , another knockout punch that’s got to hurt Nom , I guess Einstein is wrong .......again 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 You’re terribly upset aren’t you ? You've accused me of this five or six times. My answer has not changed. I am not upset that you are a stupid, obnoxious liar, no. That would be like being upset because I am not Hitler. You’re lashin out by banning and downvoting everyone Lmao. You can't remain honest for the time it takes you to write a single sentence. Go back and see if I've banned everyone, troll, or just the obnoxious cyberbullying twits who expect to be permitted to use my debate as a platform to attack me personally with lies. Besides, shouldn't you be doing your Jobsearch, you useless, work-shy twit? You've accused me of this five or six times. My answer has not changed. Maybe confession would be good for you ? I am not upset that you are a stupid, You are upset , thus the downvoting and banning , regards stupidity well your every posting demonstrates that’s its you who is actually a moron That would be like being upset because I am not Hitler. But you are more than likely upset at that also as your rabid hatred of Jews would suggest You’re lashin out by banning and downvoting everyone Lmao. You can't remain honest for the time it takes you to write a single sentence. You’re not banning but then admit you are because you blame people who call you out on your lies and brand them with what you are as in a bully Besides , shouldn’t you be doing your job search Is your annoyance over the fact that you’re obsessed with the welfare system you continue to exploit ? You’re rather annoyed no one bought your “ published author “ bullshit arent you ? Remamarkably you call me ” work shy “ but claim your syphillis laden loafer of a hero Mark was a hard working friend of the working classes , you’re comedy gold Nom Lmfao. You’re not you’re upset .......again Dermot, you are on the dole and you know it. But I’m not the one who claimed to be a published author whilst actually drawing welfare Shut up. Gosh you really are terribly upset 😠 why not go off log out and back in to downvote me ? It might help calm you down 🤔 Lmfao. You’re not you’re upset .......again Dermot, if I were upset, which I am not, then it is because you have dedicated the past three hours of your life specifically to upsetting me. Unfortunately for you, I am not upset at the infantile and obnoxious nature of your character, for the simple reason that it is not my character. I am not the one of us suffering because of it, and the fact is that you are too stupid to see that. Dermot, if I were upset, You are Unfortunately for you, I am not upset at the infantile and obnoxious nature of your character, for the simple reason that it is not my character You truly are and it is your character I am not the one of us suffering because of it You are that’s why you’re wailing about it No, I just think you are stupid. There’s that trait again where you project your flaws onto others man up and admit you’re thick as paste Your trolling is incredibly weak I’m not the one who needs 31 alt accounts to ...... troll .....theres tht projection again 🤔 because fundamentally you are an idiot who does not even possess the skill to upset a stranger. There you go projecting yet again , if you’re not upset how come you spend 24 /7 downvoting and banning everyone who corrects your inane bleatings ? 1
point
But a real man only has his word You seem to be conveniently forgetting I have literally just proved you are a liar. Honestly mate, it's sad to see you having such a complete meltdown because you lost an argument on the internet last week. It's the behaviour one would expect from a preschool kid, not a grown man. 1
point
I just watched you claim to have provided a link that debunked my claim that 54% of kids raised irreligious become religious as adults. It isn't a claim. It's a fact. You have provided nothing to support your claim other than two broken links to a single poll data collection service. I linked an academic study which took place over the course of 35 years. You provided no link, so that was a lie. Why do you accuse me of lying when literally anybody can scroll through the debate and discover I am not lying? What is the actual point? I'm not finding the link again just because you refuse to look for it, idiot. Honestly, just fuck off. You are only here to lie and distort as per usual. If you want to continue the conversation, come back after you've read the study linked, you shill dickhead. 1
point
It isn't a claim. It's a fact. You actually have to put a link in your post to me for it to be a fact. You did not. Maybe you've got the actions of your puppets confused again. You have provided nothing to support your claim other than two broken links to a single poll data collection service. Or a link to Pew Research... I linked an academic study which took place over the course of 35 years 1)You gave no link. 2)35 years is a pointless claim seeing that religious demographics are nothing like they were even in the early 2000s much less the decades before. When I was a kid, missionaries came into schools and taught the gospel. Referencing that time period in a debate about atheists today is stupidity that is beyond the pale. Why do you accuse me of lying when literally anybody can scroll through the debate and discover I am not lying? Theres that deflection again where you accuse everyone of what you actually do as in compulsively lie , caught again you English twat , now hurry off log out and back in to downvote me Theres that deflection again where you accuse everyone of what you actually do as in compulsively lie , caught again You have not caught me in anything because the link exists. It was bronto's debate, he deleted it in order to erase my post, and then followed me straight into another thread in order to lie about it. Both of you are idiotic, lying shill twats. Here is the link:- Religion Runs in the Family For Vern Bengtson, a longtime scholar at the University of Southern California, this question has driven a career's worth of research. Thirty-five years ago, Bengtson began examining the religious beliefs and practices of more than 3,500 grandparents, parents, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren. These efforts have culminated with his forthcoming study, Families and Faith: How Religion is Passed Down across Generations (Oxford University Press). The book, co-authored with research assistants Norella Putney and Susan Harris, looks at how parents seek to reproduce religious faith in their children amid an increasingly individualistic society. http://www.christianitytoday. Keep wasting your time trying to get one over on me you fucking retard. See if you succeed. 2
points
You have not caught me in anything because the link exists. It was bronto's debate, he deleted it in order to erase my post, and then followed me straight into another thread in order to lie about it. So this a complete lie. 1)I didn't create the debate. 2)The debate still exists. I'm looking at it now. So this a complete lie. Are you fucking stupid? You opened a debate up in which you claimed the people who say Christianity is passed on through intergenerational indoctrination are liars. I linked a 35 year academic study which proves they are not liars, and that the claim is accurate. You responded by posting two broken links to Pew Research Centre, and after I pointed out your links were broken you immediately deleted your own debate. Fuck off bronto. You're not even worth the time it takes to respond, you stupid shill twat. Your lies don't even make logical sense you fucking retard. Are you saying I just happened to find a 35 year academic study on cue which debunks you? By sheer coincidence? I hadn't already found it four hours previously? Fuck off, toad. 9
points
Fuck off bronto. You're not even worth the time it takes to respond, you stupid shill twat. Your lies don't even make logical sense you fucking retard. Are you saying I just happened to find a 35 year academic study on cue which debunks you? By sheer coincidence? I hadn't already found it four hours previously So no link. 8
points
2
points
Theres that deflection again where you accuse everyone of what you actually do as in compulsively lie He's reposted the link twice in the last half an hour you stupid potato-sucking jerkoff. Are you too stupid to use the Waterfall feature, ya dumb twat? Bejesus, it's true what they say about the Irish, isn't it? Not much up top. 1
point
1
point
Theres that deflection again Your delusional conspiracy theories are my deflection? How so? Are you saying I forced you to ignore what I wrote and vomit out a complete pack of paranoid lies with no relevance to anything? Damn, that was really clever of me. I must be one of those, what do you call them? Geniuses. 2
points
"The 5 Stupidest Ways People Try to Look Smart" No one likes to seem smart more than stupid people. Unfortunately, being stupid, they're not particularly good at conveying intelligence. #3 Correct Others' Trivial Mistakes Stupid people love to show off their smarts by making corrections. It could be following up on your slip of the tongue... http://www.cracked.com/blog/ your delusional conspiracy theories are my deflection? But you’re the one who jacks of while spouting your 9/11 ....... conspiracy theories 😂😂 It’s your go to deflection defence isn’t it ? Are you saying I forced you to ignore what I wrote and vomit out a complete pack of paranoid lies with no relevance to anything? Youre raging I’ve hammered you again Damn, that was really clever of me. It wasn’t It demonstrates how appallingly stupid you are Imust be one of those, what do you call them? Geniuses 🤔Which is why you didn’t know what philosophy was last night and never heard of Mathematical philosophy 👌😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 1
point
I'll wager that within the next fifteen minutes you will accuse me of being a conspiracy theorist, because that is exactly how much of a moron you are. You do claim that 9/11 was an inside job, that steel can't melt, that the terrorists who learned to fly in OKC, then disappeared after 9/11 weren't Muslims or even real, and that all of those phone calls by passengers to family describing Muslims/Arabs as the hijackers is fake. Bejesus, it's true what they say about the Irish, isn't it? Not much up top. Oh, he knows full well I'm telling the truth. He's been attacking me for the last three hours because he lost an argument to me last week. Its been non-stop attacks ever since then. The man quite literally has a mental age of five. Oh, he knows full well I'm telling the truth. As in you’re a “ published author “ 😂😂😂😂 He's been attacking me for the last three hours because he lost an argument to me last week. Says the English twat who’s still crying that everyone is kicking his English ass Its been non-stop attacks ever since then. Says the English twat who spends his day downvoting and banning everyone The man quite literally has a mental age of five. But you’re tho one who believes the 9/11 l “ experts “ as in a guy with a cheap wig and a hair lip who claims to have the inside story 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 1
point
Why do you accuse me of lying when literally anybody can scroll through the debate and discover I am not lying? What is the actual point? Because you are lying and presented no link to me. I'm looking at it right this second on the other window. I'm not finding the link again just because you refuse to look for it, idiot. Of course you aren't. Pick up what's left of your dignity and run off. Probably your best move. Honestly, just fuck off. You are only here to lie and distort as per usual. And amazingly, you can't produce one "lie" that I have told that I can't refute, and many times with your own links. Because you are lying and presented no link to me Bronto, we both know that you deleted your own debate because the study I linked debunked you. Now you are lying about it, as is clearly evidenced by the fact I pulled the link from my own browser history and reposted it. You are a liar and a shill and your personality is literally disgusting. Even the site owner, Addltd, has exposed you as a liar. Everything you say is a targeted attempt at dishonesty because that is exactly the wormlike piece of shit you are. 1
point
Bronto, we both know that you deleted your own debate because the study I linked debunked you. 1)you provided no link. 2)And I created no debate about guns. 3)You are deflecting like mad because Pew Research debunks your claims, so you have attempted the "I won't go find it again" excuse, and the "The link won't open excuse". Never mind that Grenache references the info in the link, proving you a fraud. Now you are lying about it, as is clearly evidenced by the fact I pulled the link from my own browser history and reposted it. So repost it now so we can see it. You are a liar and a shill and your personality is literally disgusting. Even the site owner, Addltd, has exposed you as a truth teller. Everything you say is a targeted attempt at dishonesty because that is exactly the wormlike piece of shit you are Let's cut to the chase Nom. You exhibit every trait of someone who was abused as a child. A parent, a trusted adult. Doesn't matter. But we both know that someone abused you. It made you feel helpless. It made you angry. It made you not trust people. Nevertheless, you are splaining these passive aggressive behaviors due to said abuse. Now keep them to yourself, or perhaps we could create a thread about reputable shrinks in Britain that you could go see. you provided no link Shut up liar. You couldn't tell the truth if your life depended on it. This entire site has been fully aware that you are a liar ever since you claimed you had been collecting people's IP addresses, and Addltd pointed out your claim was impossible. Nothing you say is true. All of it is the opposite of the truth. You are a lying toad who fully deserves to get cancer. You made a claim in a debate which was a lie, I proved it was a lie, and when I did you deleted your debate. 10
points
So post the link, right here. Sure. Here it is for the third time, liar:- Religion Runs in the Family For Vern Bengtson, a longtime scholar at the University of Southern California, this question has driven a career's worth of research. Thirty-five years ago, Bengtson began examining the religious beliefs and practices of more than 3,500 grandparents, parents, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren. These efforts have culminated with his forthcoming study, Families and Faith: How Religion is Passed Down across Generations (Oxford University Press). The book, co-authored with research assistants Norella Putney and Susan Harris, looks at how parents seek to reproduce religious faith in their children amid an increasingly individualistic society. http://www.christianitytoday. 10
points
Which in no way debunks pew research's findings that 54% of people raised as atheists don't end up as atheists as adults. The point? Pointing out that most people raised religious end up religious as adults is a stupid point to try and make when most atheists wind up religious.... Anything else Nom? You seem to be conveniently forgetting I have literally just proved you are a liar You always accuse others of what you do as in lie , downvote and ban anyone who corrects you Honestly mate, it's sad to see you having such a complete meltdown because you lost an argument on the internet last week You mean the argument where you immediately logged out and in 31 times ? Just to downvote me all because I crushed you yet again It's the behaviour one would expect from a preschool kid, not a grown man There’s that projection again accusing others of exactly what you do , you’re really particularly upset today is that because Amarel , X , Bronto , Antrim and I have all thrashed you in the last 24 hours yet again ? You mean the argument where you immediately logged out and in 31 times ? There is literally no physical way you could know that I logged in and out 31 times, even if I did, which I didn't. Everything you say is stupid and false because you are an IDIOT. Don't just read it. Really understand it. You are thicker than a bucket of custard and you are more dishonest than Hitler. You are, in sum, a sad, pathetic little man with all the characteristics of a sewer rat. There is literally no physical way you could know that I logged in and out 31 times, You’re really upset aren’t you even if I did, You did which I didn't. You still did Everything you say is stupid and false because you are an IDIOT. But yet I thrash you in every exchange , you’re really upset Don't just read it. Really understand it. You are thicker than a bucket of custard and you are more dishonest than Hitler. But you’re the conspiracy thoeorist and Stalinist not me You are, in sum, a sad, pathetic little man with all the characteristics of a sewer rat. So let’s see you’ve called me a retard , Hitler , a goat , a sewer rat , an imbecile etc , etc , you really need to work on your insults don’t you ? I’m delighted I’ve really upset you haven’t I ? 2
points
I would like to publish a book about The New Mesiah. We are on the threshold of an”post human “ transformation. The problem is not technology- it’s the old dusty Abrahamic books that we can’t let go of. Everyone is terrified of a new doctrine! I agree that a society needs a doctrine- It it must evolve as the world evolves. @Slavedevice Go for it--in the modern world of self-publishing, e-publishing, ect., if one has something to say, the avenues to express these thoughts in detail are available. If you are not already aware, I would suggest looking into e-publishing with Amazon if you do decide to write your book. 2
points
2
points
Decades ago I actually put together a collection of poems with illustrations and shopped it around. But it just wasn't what publishers were looking for. They did recommend publishing some individually in journals or such but I never did. And no, I'm not going to share them with the trolls on Create Debate. This isn't the type of site for that type of communications. Dirty limericks maybe, but not any of what I'd written back then. 2
points
|
