Evergreen College having 'Day without white people'. Blatant racism, yes no?
this is real systemstic racism
Side Score: 10
|
 |
but my feelings
Side Score: 7
|
|
|
|
|
The scariest thing about this whole Bret Weinstein incident is that he actually had a mob of students scouring the campus for him (and he's a progressive). In the twisted mind of the social justice mob it's racist to be against racial segregation. Side: this is real systemstic racism
Hello W: Do you mean racial segregation as in keeping the races separate?? Like apartheid??? Being for it seems like you want WHITE schools, WHITE communities, and WHITE facilities for the use of WHITE people only.. I guess it's because you find sharing a bathroom or a classroom with a black person somehow distasteful.. Call me twisted, but that sounds pretty racist to me.. Having said that, in this great land of ours, a man is FREE to be a racist, and ought to be able to express his opinions. He isn't immune from condemnation for them, but that's not the same as preventing him from speaking.. I'm a social justice warrior AND a champion of free speech. excon Side: but my feelings
I think you've misread what I've said. The "day of absence" was racial segregation and everything I wrote was against it. Thank you for taking a stance against Evergreen College's day of racial segregation, despite the fact it was only racist against whites. Side: this is real systemstic racism
The original point to the day where black people could leave campus was to open a dialogue about how far the African-American community had come. It was a day where black people could choose to leave and not get docked for attendance and it had good intentions. Then it was warped. If you try to have a "day without white people" and physically stop them from coming to class that is racist. If you yell and shout verbal abuse to those who come to class, that is racist. If you, in any way, try to stop a person from coming to class because of the color of their skin, that is racist. Side: this is real systemstic racism
|
The Bongo has graphically illustrated for over a century that their psyche' and racial tendencies are incompatible with those of white people. The Bongo has been shouting from the roof tops for decades that they are as capable and clever as white people, as, for instance, we've witnessed in the once beautiful and prosperous cities of Detroit and Chicago. So, in this context how can there be a problem with granting the Bongo their wish to live and prosper separately from ''THE BIG BAD WHITE MAN''? The Bongo will have the opportunity to prove all those white racists wrong by establishing stable and effective devolved government whilst creating world beating labour intensive industries and commercial enterprises all of which would create millions of jobs and produce sufficient tax revenue to maintain public services such as education, social housing, welfare benefits and medical treatment. The experiment of trying to mix oil and water has failed miserably and to continue with this futile undertaking will serve no purpose other than to prolong the misery for both blacks and whites and retard the nation's efforts to recover from the Obama induced years of economic stagnation. The ''segregation bullet'' will have to be bitten sooner or later and I don't see any merit in prolonging the agony. I would like to hear from anyone who may consider my segregation proposals as favouring one racial group over another, how and why they have have made this interpretation from my unbiased comments. Side: but my feelings
|
