CreateDebate


Debate Info

14
17
Yeh I saw one No that's the definition
Debate Score:31
Arguments:16
Total Votes:39
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yeh I saw one (12)
 
 No that's the definition (13)

Debate Creator

Judge-Ito(135) pic



Fallacies do not exist.

Perpetual motion devices? Fallacy?
Or are we just lacking the technology? 
Is a 'fallacy' just our human boundary?
How? It's just a concept.


Yeh I saw one

Side Score: 14
VS.

No that's the definition

Side Score: 17
0 points

Having the ability to comprehend a fallacy, cancels it out.

Therefor a fallacy can not exist.

Side: Yeh I saw one
1 point

Having the ability to comprehend a fallacy, cancels it out.

Therefor a fallacy can not exist.

Awesome. I comprehend English. Therefore English does not exist.

Put down the crack pipe and walk away.

Side: No that's the definition
Judge-Ito(135) Disputed
0 points

Didn't know you considered the English language a fallacy but it kind of makes a lot of sense after that beauty.

Side: Yeh I saw one
Amarel(5669) Disputed
1 point

Logical fallacies are not the same as gaps in knowledge. Greater knowledge and understanding will never make an insult of a person serve as a rebuttal against their argument. Circular reasoning, contradiction, straw man, and any other fallacy cannot be validated by enlightened thinking as they are all the product of irrationality and confusion.

Side: No that's the definition
Judge-Ito(135) Disputed
1 point

You're not saying human beings are fallacies, are you?

Or are you just getting off track, re read the debate title.

Side: Yeh I saw one
No arguments found. Add one!