For all the phonies who claim you're against No Restriction abortions, yet never speak out
|
1
point
For every phoney who claims to be against the inhumanity of No Restriction abortions... look in your hearts, look in your souls, look in the mirror if you dare, and try explaining to yourself why you and the Left are silent. If you actually possessed the character to look within yourself, you would have to ban yourselves! Explain your vision of how the United States would implement an abortion ban. Give the details of how you could possibly do it and enforce a ban for example, would you force women to undergo pregnancy tests once a month? Would you lock up women who you suspect might get an abortion? Would you put women who get abortions in prison? You won't give the details because you can't. Now go ahead and do what you do best, ban me. A ban on abortion would simply target hospitals/ doctors that perform them. Hospitals are already heavily regulated and monitored, so an abortion ban would not be difficult to implement on that end. As for the rest, nobody enforces “pre-crime” penalties, that’s rediculous. Punishment would follow evidence of a crime having been committed, just like anything else. If the ban is on the performance of abortions, then doctors are the target, not women. 1
point
Why would I ban you when you were not vulgar, did not insult me, and were not trying to be deceptive. I will answer your question.... If I were President, and had enough Congressmen & Senators to change the law, I would make abortion illegal once more except in cases of Life of Mother, and some other extreme cases that would be very clearly spelled out in the law. I would throw doctors, who illegally killed unborn babies, in prison as we do murderers who would kill you. I would also fine the Doctor, the mother, and the father if he was an accomplice to the murder. The money from the fines would go towards crisis pregnancy centers, and other health clinics dealing with problem pregnancies, adoptions, etc. Why would there be a need for pregnancy testing? If they get pregnant, they will have the baby unless extreme cases. If they illegally have an abortion, it would be treated as a crime against innocent lives just like we do if you were killed. The punishment would be determined by the people and those we elect. I'm so sick of hearing pathetic pro abortion excuses about women going down back alleys to kill a baby. If they choose to do this, even when there would be much more support for crisis pregnancy centers, etc., they deserve what the law deals out. I have no sympathy for killers, no matter their so called hardships of having the baby. We as a civilized nation should never condone murder just because of the circumstances. Adoption is always an option, whereby the adopting parents can help pay for the pregnancy. I would also go after the dead beat father if he abandoned the child. He would be forced to support the mother and child. The conscience of America would once more be lifted to support our children instead of treating them like burdens. Parents who abandon their children would be considered abusive for doing so and forced to financially support their children, or shamed! We no longer shame the abusive behavior of abandoning children. We are living in the no fault culture where anything goes and no one speaks out against irresponsibility. 1
point
Do you see what you just did. You twisted the debate from No Restriction abortions of late term viable babies, to outlawing all abortions. Can any of you ever have the honesty to address this inhumanity of killing viable babies that you support wth your vote? The majority of States already have limits on late term abortions. HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE? ACCORDING TO YOU IT WOULD BE ABOUT IMPOSSIBLE TO ENFORCE SUCH LAWS! There are already about 40 States that have laws prohibiting late term abortions unless extreme cases. Ask them how they do it! 1
point
What restriction is best? Do you agree first two terms should allow abortions? What I've read and heard seems to indicate that it is the third trimester where most debate is sparked even amongst prochoice advocates. How about focusing the fight on the third trimester getting banned? I think the first two trimesters are much harder to stop abortions in. 1
point
The GOP has tried a umber of times to get a 20 week compromise (with extreme case exceptions) and the Democrat Party refuses to compromise. They support all abortions up to birth and use the ludicrous all incompassing "health" of mother wording which allows all abortions for any reason including depression, etc. The reasons I speak much about No Retriction abortions is because that would be the starting point of compromise to at least protect viable late term babies. This is the clear distintions between the GOP and Democrat Party. 1
point
|
