CreateDebate


Debate Info

2
12
Hayek Dangerous
Debate Score:14
Arguments:12
Total Votes:14
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Hayek (2)
 
 Dangerous (10)

Debate Creator

brontoraptor(28599) pic



Friedrich A. Hayek warned us why Socialism is dangerous

Our freedom of choice in a competitive society rests on the fact that, if one person refuses to satisfy our wishes, we can turn to another. But if we face a monopolist we are at his absolute mercy. And an authority directing the whole economic system of the country would be the most powerful monopolist conceivable…it would have complete power to decide what we are to be given and on what terms. It would not only decide what commodities and services were to be available and in what quantities; it would be able to direct their distributions between persons to any degree it liked.

Hayek

Side Score: 2
VS.

Dangerous

Side Score: 12
1 point

I don't see socialism as dangerous. I DO see an authoritarian, secular government as VERY dangerous. What could be MORE dangerous to a republic with the Constitution WE HAVE! It is against authoritarianism, it is against ANY ONE RELIGION!

Nowhere does it say it is against socialism … against some of the ways socialism was USED, by authoritarian governments, to be sure! The authoritarian governments that took private ownership away and used it to pad their pockets was unacceptable in a democracy, unacceptable to our Constitution!

In like manner, the "taking control of the U.S. government" by dangerous capitalists in the 1800's was also dangerous. We can be thankful for a Republican, Teddy Roosevelt, for stopping that! We, with our Constitution … and non-authoritarian government, … can stop the bad parts of socialism, and use the good parts, just like Teddy did with capitalism! It's not socialism that's dangerous, it's an authoritarian government … like the one Trump wants … that makes ANY form of economic system "dangerous", for the people! Where are the Republicans when we need them, NOW! Gone hunting in the Balkans, I guess. "Shoot, comrade, shoot"! :-)

Side: Hayek
Amarel(5669) Disputed
2 points

Nowhere does it say it is against socialism …

It does. The Constitution lays out all the things our federal government can do. For example, the government can pay for a socialized postal services, and socialized roads. But the 10th Amendment says that if the Constitution doesn’t give the Federal government a particular power (such as welfare), and doesn’t bar states from said power, then that power is left to the States or to the people (privately).

Side: Dangerous
Amarel(5669) Disputed
1 point

It's not socialism that's dangerous, it's an authoritarian government

“From the saintly and single-minded idealist to the fanatic is often but a step.”

-Hayek

Side: Dangerous
1 point

Where are the Republicans when we need them, NOW! Gone hunting in the Balkans, I guess.

Sitting here watching the economy going off like it's the 4th of July while Democrats try and sabatoge their own economy for votes. Party before America, eh Al?

Oh, and it's nice to not be in a bunch of mindless military episodes while the world is set on fire for a change.

Side: Dangerous
1 point

"Shoot, comrade, shoot"! :-)

The Communists are left wing. Conservatives are the only thing in their way. You keep electing people who are hard to tell apart from them ideologically.

Side: Dangerous
1 point

I don't see socialism as dangerous

Oh? Tell me what U.S.S.R. stands for.

Hey look. I did it for you.

The Soviet Union,[b] officially the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics[c] (USSR),[d] was a socialist state in Eurasia that existed from 1922 to 1991.[10] Nominally a union of multiple national Soviet republics,[e] its government and economy were highly centralized. The country was a one-party state, governed by the Communist Party with Moscow as its capital in its largest republic, the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (Russian SFSR).

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/SovietUnion

Side: Dangerous
1 point

This is wrong and dangerous

This is wrong and dangerousThis is wrong and dangerous

Side: Hayek

please leave i fear u will never leave can u leave now mbe tomorrow buy one ikea they on sale but still no winning

Side: Dangerous

please no more

please no moreplease no more

please no more

please no more

please no more

please no more

please no more

Side: Dangerous
2 points

“A claim for equality of material position can be met only by a government with totalitarian powers.”

-Hayek

Side: Dangerous
1 point

“The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design.”

-Hayek

Side: Dangerous
1 point

“We must face the fact that the preservation of individual freedom is incompatible with a full satisfaction of our views of distributive justice.”

-Hayek

Side: Dangerous