FromWithin, SaintNow/NowASaint are the Same Person!
Yeppers!
Side Score: 22
|
 |
Yuppers!
Side Score: 9
|
|
|
|
|
0
points
Another Progressive lieing fool who spends his time insulting and being intolerant of people who do not think like him. For you to actually think we are the same person, speaks to your utter stupidity. There could not be more difference in the manners we debate, but please keep spewing lunacy an i will simply ignore you as usual. Side: Yuppers!
Another Progressive lieing fool who spends his time insulting and being intolerant of people who do not think like him. You're an idiot... seriously. If you spent less time being so self consumed you'd know that I'm about as far from being a progressive as is possible. Also, what is lieing? I'm not familiar with this word? Could it be you meant lying? Surely someone of your intelligence couldn't be so stupid? Ha! For you to actually think we are the same person, speaks to your utter stupidity. There could not be more difference in the manners we debate, but please keep spewing lunacy an i will simply ignore you as usual. Nice try but you're the stupid one... don't you remember that debate I banned you from? You got so pissed off that you immediately (within seconds) logged in under SaintNow and started copy and pasting all of FromWithin's arguments and reposting them all over the debate. Hahaha! That was soooo much fun. You were SO pissed! LMAO! Side: Yeppers!
I can't prove it, and indeed it may not be true, but I've suspected that recently myself. The red flag for me was when I was online at times I really didn't think most others would be and yet somehow both those guys were actively on my case on multiple debates. Hey, it's an old trick on debate websites for people to hold multiple avatars. Some do it for fun, some for malice, some to keep their chosen site a hotbed of controversy. It wouldn't surprise me if the two most persistent ultraconservatives on this site have the same puppetmaster. Side: Yeppers!
That is the debate I posted a year ago to set him up. I pissed him off, banned him and he immediately logged in as SaintNow and copied all his FromWithin arguments and started reposting them all over the debate. Side: Yeppers!
I find that quite convincing. There is no other logical reason why FromWithin would copy verbatim from SaintNow. And I can totally believe it was a careless misstep because both those characters habitually cut an paste their arguments multiple places under the same debate threads. I can believe in the midst of copy and pasting the identities got mixed up. Side: Yeppers!
|
1
point
I think FW is a different person. Clearly, he is much greater of an idiot than NaS could ever be. Even though, it doesn't seem like a lot of difference from up. But there is a considerable difference in how they argue, and their choice of words. He doesn't seem smart enough to deliberately do so. Thus, FW is different. The other two, though, are meant to obviously be same. NaS probably lost access to his old account and so created new one (as is evident from the exclusive activity.) Side: Yuppers!
http://www.createdebate.com/debate/show/ A WomanisRapedGetsPregnantAndwillDieWithoutanAbortionWhatShouldShe_Do That is the debate I posted a year ago to set him up. I pissed him off, banned him and he immediately logged in as SaintNow and copied all his FromWithin arguments and started reposting them all over the debate. Click all the drop downs, read it all and you will see. Side: Yuppers!
The link didn't post correctly: Side: Yuppers!
1
point
You know that anything would be more likely than his being smart enough to deliberately do this, right? See FW's arguments. He's an idiot so big that he can't properly act like himself (/consistently). It is absurd to even consider that he can handle using 2 rather different styles consistently. I'll be going with that he didn't have the proper manners to attribute while copying, or even make explicit that he did so. Unlike, say, KN, for whom we can tell from validity of sentence structures whether she copied or not. Side: Yuppers!
1
point
Or there's the possibility that someone smart is acting like the both idiots. But it is terribly boring to do such a thing constantly for so long without ever slipping up. Perhaps a collection of people participating on the project so that no one gets excessively bored? Then I wonder whether we can call them the 'same person'. Side: Yuppers!
|
