Gay guys are better babysitters than Catholic Priests
Totally true
Side Score: 24
|
 |
So not true
Side Score: 20
|
|
Gay guys aren't repressed like Catholic Priests. They want a grown ass man, or a pixie. They don't need to molest children. Chances are that either would make a fine babysitter. But I'm going to support this side, because I feel this debate is directed at the myth that child molesters are gay. 148 days ago | Tagged As: Totally true
This is a great documentary about the Catholic molestation scandal http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0814075/ you guys are wrong about girls not being molested and also many molesters who prey on boys are not gay 148 days ago | Tagged As: Totally true
You can't use a documentary as a heavy argument, nor should you automatically accept it as truth. It's a movie. It has a bias to make money, and they capitalize on conspiracy. I doubt that the Catholic church would allow that again. To protect the reputation of the church they have learned that they must denounce the wrongful doing. 148 days ago | Tagged As: Totally true
Im just pointing the movie out to ya if you might be interested. I know some documentary´s are very biased, but this one came out after all the court cases and major media attention. In it the priest who was the molester along with others is interviewed and the facts of the case are not disputed at all (not so that I have seen) The movie even won an Oscar :) Its not like Im using an Alex Jones documentary about the Illuminati as an argument here Like I said the facts of the case have been reported by numerous sources. The movie is just a good place to get in all in one package 148 days ago | Tagged As: So not true
I obviously would say yeah for many reasons: a: lesser change of my children learning stupid stuff and creative history b: Kids get used to the Idea that people are varied c: Most gay people dont have kids, so they have more money to buy cool stuff that the kids can play with. d: lesser chance of my kid getting molested 148 days ago | Tagged As: Totally true
|
A very small percentage of priests are pedophiles, This is obvious anti-Catholic and makes unfounded claims and is very offensive. Just because a few priests f-ed up does not mean that all Catholic priests are pedophiles. There are many non catholic ministers that are pedophiles that no one hears about because being Catholic is a grave offense to those who have a low moral standard. 148 days ago | Tagged As: So not true
well very small percentage of Al-kaida members are suicide bombers too. Look at the documentary I recomended. The shamefull thing that the Catholic church as a whole did was to try to silence the issue and would always move the molester to a new church and silence the victims and victims family´s which only gave the molester free reign and resulted in him molesting over 130 victims. I can understand that people find this very offensive but that is because we have grown accustomed to the church being holier then thou and it has been a taboo to point out its sick customs and unnatural position against sexual behavior (abstinence) which most likely caused this. 148 days ago | Tagged As: Totally true
The Bishop that did that is at fault but no the whole Catholic Church. Any priests that molest children should be given to the proper authorities and punished. Attacking all Catholicpriests because of a few bad apples is bad because it results in false stereo types which causes histeria and hate for no reason. 148 days ago | Tagged As: So not true
Tugman is correct, it is a very small percentage of priests. You can't use a documentary as a heavy argument, nor should you automatically accept it as truth. It's a movie. It has a bias to make money, and they capitalize on conspiracy. I doubt that the Catholic church would allow that again. To protect the reputation of the church they have learned that they must denounce the wrongful doing. 148 days ago | Tagged As: Totally true
Guys who molest little boys are ALWAYS gay... Catholic Priest or not. and there has been one case of a Catholic Priest molesting a little girl. But as for baby sitter... well, let's see: If it's a girl, then i'll let it be a gay guy. If it's a boy, it won't matter either way. 99.9% of boy molesters (who were male) are not Catholic Priests. So it's actually less likely. 148 days ago | Tagged As: So not true
http://www.springerlink.com/content/ http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/ According to these studies, guys who molest little boys are ALWAYS STRAIGHT I would think that priests molest children due to sexual repression. Like a man (or woman) in prison who forms a homosexual relationship with another inmate. My opinion is also that priests pick males because it is more socially acceptable for them to be alone with the boys, than the girls. So molesting the alter boy is easier than finding a way to molest a girl. "They're all the same at that age." -Child Molester, Law and Order: SVU 148 days ago | Tagged As: Totally true
I kinda agreed with your argument until: 99.9% of boy molesters (who were male) are not Catholic Priests. So it's actually less likely. If you're going to justify your argument using statistics then at least use the right ones. If your going to argue that it's safer for priests to babysit kids then you'd need the percentage of priests that are child molesters, not the percentage of child molesters that are priests. That would be like me saying, only a small percentage of murderers belong to al-Qaeda, therefore it would be safer to hire someone from al-Qaeda to babysit my kids. (Note: I'm not comparing priests to al-Qaeda, I'm just giving an example) My own opinion is that you'd be pretty safe with either one...unless you count the mental damage done when the kids are guilt tripped by the priest. 148 days ago | Tagged As: Totally true
|
