Girl on cover of Time Magazine wasn't actually seperated from her parents
|
4
points
It doesn't matter whether the little girl was separated from her parents or not. I mean, of course, it is devastating if she was. But the media's job is to raise awareness about the issues in the world and that is exactly what this picture does. Because even if she wasn't separated, some other kid was. And now with this picture popping up everywhere, she represents all the children on the border who have been and will be separated from their parents. So the real question is... How accurate does news have to be to portray the true reality of the world? 2
points
So far we've seen the libs show us pictures of Obama migrants in cages that they blamed on Trump, a magazine cover with a fake child on it with Trump, and a denial that Trump was inforcing a law created by Democrats, then an admittance he was right, then they sued him for his executive order to keep kids with their families because he was right the first time. And you wonder why I'm not a Democrat... 1
point
Hi, Al. Are you actually intending to say what it looks like you are? It looks like you are saying that an intentional lie is not a problem so long as - 1 - a similar thing happened to somebody somewhere or - 2 - somebody else said something equally dishonest Come on, Al. We disagree a lot, but I don't ever see you acting as an apologist for dishonesty. What point were you really trying to make? But she WAS an excellent example of what thousands of kids went through under certain "Christian Bible laws" (according to our pious AG)! :-( …. THERE IS NO EXCUSE! This is cons using a bad example to cover up for a WORSE example! Now AL you Progressives get crazier each and every day AL let me help you out here !!!!! Stick with reality ? Oh yeah not a world the Progressives can exist in !!!!!!!!!! 1
point
Rusty shows up with zero facts as usual. Because that is all you got Boy !!!!!! Dummy you need anymore verification from the Progressive Media you so adore ????? |
