CreateDebate


Debate Info

Debate Score:13
Arguments:14
Total Votes:14
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Give me a nonreligious reason for opposing gay marriage. I just don't care if they get mar (13)

Debate Creator

NKJV(511) pic



Give me a nonreligious reason for opposing gay marriage. I just don't care if they get mar

Why should I forced my religion on people?
Add New Argument
1 point

Hello N,

Marriage is for legal fuking, and thay gist cain’t fuk.

excon

I've seen far-right atheists use an argument about how being gay is a disease (and we shouldn't allow gay marriage) because it goes against "evolution" since it doesn't produce offspring.

It's an absolutely ludicrous argument which is merely them attempting to justify their irrational dislike of gays, but there you go.

It's biologically unacceptable and unhealthy. Look at the human annatomy and if the dick is made for the anus, why would it break over time of several penetration unlike the design of the vagina and i would have to tolerate some grown ass man in diapers stinking of faeces. Every gay has a disease related to the anus, every one of them who bends over. More than 40% of gays in the world have STD's. It is the fastest sex to get an STD(America's male marine team fuck themselves for lack feminine holes) And they don't keep it to themelves especially those stupid confused bisexuals. It is abuse of human nature and organs caused by a mental misorder and sometimes emotuonal confusion. These gays need mental clinics not rights.

THE SLIPPERY SLOPE!

When you open the door for groups with unnatural sexual orientations to force every single State to change their marriage laws, you have set a precedent for every other unnaturral group to force their so called equal rights.

Do you want men having 30 wives in every State?

Do you want adults marrying consenting children?

Do you want men marrying animals for spousal benefits? You laugh? We also laughed the first time they started talking about gay marriage. Some people leave their inheritance to their pets when they die. Marriage would give their pets benefits.

When you start allowing one group to change our marriage laws, you have made a precedent to allow all groups to do the same. Pretty soon you see the break down in our family unit, as we are already seeing today.

If you noticed, fewer millenials are getting married and opting to live together. If people see no benefits in marriage today, why do you suppose Gays are so adamant about being able to marry?

It's because they want the sanction from everyone else how their lifestyles are quote "normal". Biology says otherwise.

It boils down to insecurity about their lifestyles. They know it is not natural, so if we make it legal to marry, it supposedly legitimizes it.

Atrag(5666) Clarified
0 points

THE SLIPPERY SLOPE!

Hellno you retard. It is called the slippery slope fallacy.

1 point

Give me a nonreligious reason for opposing gay marriage

Arguably, the Government shouldn't be involved in marriage at all

John_C_1812(277) Disputed
1 point

Government does not want to be involved in marriage. The United States Constitution provided authority under common defense to the General welfare as marriage is a religious likelihood. The issue of law is that a marriage can add to the United States of Americas population by pregnancy. Meaning the right to require a license was a way to record the unions which may by admission and consummation describe the creation of a living person.

1 point

Insert any generic marriage sucks argument. Basically, if you let the gays marry they would be as unhappy as all the straights who get married.

But not me, no. I love my marriage. And am also 100% supportive of gay marriage.

But the above would be a nonreligious reason.

Got to applaud you for this by the way, you've managed to compile all the deluded bigots nicely into one thread. Kudos.

1 point

Yes, I hate it when bigotted Democrats come up with racist terms like uncle tom, race traitor, and fence jumper to describe blacks and gays who don't vote Democrat.

I also love it when Democrats quickly label anything that isn't pro gay as bigotted while ignoring Muslim views on homosexuality like the plague because it makes elitist Democrats feel icky to call brown bigots "bigots". Kudos to the OP for bringing out the hypocrites, eh Nick?

NicolasCage(505) Disputed
1 point

Uhh... why are you ranting on about democrats all of a sudden? Seems rather unrelated to the debate.

Also, why are you attributing those views to me when I've stated numerous times to you that I'm not a democrat? Then again, from the way you speak, I sincerely doubt you ever read more than just skimming through people's arguments.

You don't need a "nonreligious reason" against gay marriage. Gay marriage is legal, the Supreme Court allowed it, and Trump doesn't oppose it.

Ok, let me address it this way Constitutional. When you say you do not care are you saying any one should have the ability to effect immigration allowing person into a County for love or money regardless of their gender?

When you say you do not care are you saying the United States should be compromised legally by removing its common defense protecting it from taking part in committing a crime? Using is governing power to instruct other to commit a crime? The common defense was that couples of opposite gender can create a citizen of a nation through pregnancy. Adoption only acquires a citizen, or non-citizen that has be created by another couple. The request made by law through Court for witness Consummation, and license are based only on this protection of self-incrimination.

When saying you do not care are you saying it is ok to lie publicly under oath as a gay-man and lesbian –woman can be married and produce a citizen of a country by use of pregnancy and simple choice not to?

When you say you do not care does this include that same gender couples can be grain many rights simply by incorporating without the public application of vast intellectual crimes that are hard to explain to juries?

0 points

Hate the sin, love the sinner.

The problem is, people who make a fetish out of homosexuality turn it into a form of identity, so they can't tell the difference.

Well, personally I believe the government should stay out of marriage entirely. Since that isn't the case...

The laws concerning marriage and the perks that come with that were written with a certain intent that is not applicable to homosexual unions.

Now as far as homosexuality itself?

I do not think that homosexuality is something that should be encouraged at all. I think it is clearly the abhorrent behavior of those who are intolerant of the opposite sex who take their own personal whim as standard. I think it is better that men and women unite and make it work out. It is better for society.

It is easier for a man to get along with a man. It is easier for a woman to get along with a woman. Is a preference for those of the same sex an outward sign of inward intolerance towards the opposite sex? I don't know, but sometimes it looks like that to me.

I think any woman who thinks they are just "one of the guys" is delusional, it is not natural for a man to see a woman a being a man. To all those girls who think they are "one of the guys", most of those guys are probably trying to have sex with you. You are taking advantage of men using your evil lesbian woman magic. You have influence over them. Don't kid yourself, you are cheating.

I think any man who thinks they are just "one of the girls" is delusional... Look, I can't speak for the ladies, but if they are anything like guys, they might feed into the delusions of such a man, but no way is it natural for them to look at a man as if they are a woman. If 80s hair metal is an indication of anything, girls might be into guys who look like girls. I don't know. To all those guys who think they are just "one of the girls", you have superpowers over these women like the ability to not menstruate, the ability to pee while standing up, and no matter how much of a sally sissy tail you are, every man knows that woman are not naturally as strong as men. Do you see how easy they bruise? Most women ain't no Ronda Rousey, if you know what I mean. Don't kid yourself, you are cheating.

Why be against homosexual marriage? Because it's abominable, and clearly so. There shouldn't be any doubt that this is perversion. Where is the line drawn?

Like I said, I think the governments should stay out of marriage all together. That isn't the case, and maybe it isn't practical from a bureaucratic standpoint. I don't know.

So right now in The United States, homosexual marriage is legal. Let them get married, I say. I respect the right of all people to make bad decisions, and indeed, at some point we all have to come to terms with the fact that living with other people's bad decisions is something that is unavoidable.

What people do in private when no one is looking is not something I want to make my business. It isn't my business. Isn't really anyone's business. Except maybe the NSA or something.

Your device is watching you fap