Your Democrat priests aren't going to like this Al. If you say this in the new Progressive dystopia, you'll be killed. Your new Stalin will be demanding those guns. Not some guns. ALL guns. Farrakhan and his Democrat friends don'T want us disarmed to protect us, but the opposite.

These weapons are made to kill yes, because we have the right to a well armed ,militia against any threat, where as they can be abused, and sometimes are, that is not the fault of the people, and they should not have to give over their assault rifles just because of stupid people.

You don't "wish to be educated on this terminology".

Yes I do, because some have other definitions than others. For example, you say an assault weapon is "a weapon of war". But if you look up the definition of assault weapon, you'll find that states generally say that assault weapons are semi-automatic rifles, pistols, and shotguns that can accept detachable magazines and possess one or more features. Some even say that revolvers are assault weapons. If I want to put a suppressor on my rifle, I should be able to.

meant for mowing down as many people per minute as possible

Really? So what stops someone with a 30-round magazine firing in semi-auto mode from killing just as many people as someone in full-auto mode? Fully-automatic weapons could be argued as less lethal (even though all guns are meant to kill) because they are less accurate. No gun is only made to shred paper, by the way.

From the "Tommy-gun" to the Uzi, to the M16 etc. are weapons one would use to assault a military objective

And who owns these guns legally in the United States? Tell me, please.

The hundreds of Americans mowed down in seconds

When was the last time more than 100 American civilians were shot and killed by a gunman?

have lost their "amendments" of freedom of speech

Rights cannot be called amendments, and you should know this.

Regardless, that doesn't make the Second Amendment unconstitutional and neither does owning a gun.