God is an Atheist.
Atheism is a lack of belief in god.
Belief consists of a degree of uncertainty about the position believed in.
God is All knowing and thus lacks uncertainty.
Thus god is an Atheist.
True
Side Score: 19
|
False.
Side Score: 13
|
|
|
|
4
points
http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/11/19/ I do not take any credit for the following: "I had a JW call at my door. After a bit of discussion I asked if his god believed in a higher power than itself. No, he said, as his god was “top”. There was nothing above his god, so he was forced to agree that his god didn’t get his morals from a higher authority, and didn’t get them from a book either. So, I said, we call people who don’t believe in a higher authority than themselves, and that don’t get their morals from a book, Atheists. I said if Atheism is good enough for god, then it’s good enough for me. That flummoxed him." Side: True
1
point
1
point
|
1
point
0
points
are you saying that not believing in god is not the exclusive domain of atheism? Your argument is A is B B is C D is C thus D is A (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ My logical form without the negatives is as follows B is A (theism is a belief) If A then C ( if there is a belief there is uncertainty) not C (god has no uncertainty) thus not A and Not B. Side: True
2
points
are you saying that not believing in god is not the exclusive domain of atheism? I'm saying I gave a sarcastic "argument" that obviously wasn't well thought out in response to what I consider to be a silly debate topic. I suppose we need to add (where belief is possible) to the definition of the word atheist. Side: False.
1
point
1
point
God wouldn't believe in himself, he would know in himself. So he would be a gnostic theist. You are equivocating "believe in" between "to accept existence of" and "to support." Your sentence ought to read "God wouldn't accept his existence, he would know of his existence." Then your logic falls apart. Side: False.
0
points
|