Guns aren't the problem. It's a culture and poverty problem
True
Side Score: 38
|
 |
False
Side Score: 12
|
|
|
|
|
True guns aren't the problem. Democrats view it differently though. Clinton's adoring rhetoric about Australia's gun confiscation and about obliterating the "gun culture." The explicit gun proposals which she endorses expressly and possibly by illegal executive action rubber-stamped by puppet judges are more than enough to ban most guns. Testifying in a Senate committee in 1993 amid her health care reform push, Clinton told Sen. Bill Bradley, D-New Jersey, she was "all for" his proposed 25% tax on handguns and $2,500 licensing fees for gun dealers. "I'm not looking to repeal the Second Amendment. I'm not looking to take people's guns away," she said. "But I am looking for more support for the reasonable efforts that need to be undertaken to keep guns out of the wrong hands." said Hillary. Under Democrat views who makes the decision to keep guns out of the wrong hands and how do Democrats know which are the right hands and wrong hands for owning guns. Side: True
|
Perhaps you would explain from where all the 'good jobs' would come and exactly where the 'desirable residences' in civilised neighbourhoods to which you refer are located. If you can do that then I will task you to detail how, and by whom these luxuries will be paid for and which sector(s) of the population will have to forfeit their jobs to accommodate the influx of unwanted immigrants. Side: False
3
points
I'll tell you what I heard from that. "We liberals want the Mexicans here because someone has to do the jobs that no one wants." 1)That's called plantation politics and stems from blatant racism established in the Democratic party's political leadership. 2)If they weren't doing those jobs,unemployment would have a chance to go down to reasonable positions, and the systemwould adjust to the worker to work ratio. Side: True
3
points
If he doesn't un-ban you, perhaps you should start a debate on this topic yourself. Rejecting with all your being is not an argument. Especially when rates of poverty are high in the black community. Making the poverty/crime correlation more relevant to black people, at least to those living in poverty. Inner city drug use is also highly correlated with poverty and crime. And the people who kill each other to acquire and maintain territory to sell illicit, poverty promoting, substances are often the same people who live there. Which means they are often black. Nothing about this is racist. I am not saying that there is anything inherent to black people that keeps them in higher rates of poverty and crime. It's part of the inner city drug culture, which is currently affecting black people disproportionately. Side: True
2
points
Hello, excon. I am somewhat confused. (Oh, boy, will some jump on that!), I can't see where I insinuated or stated it was a "black problem".??? I have three black grandchildren and I am about as color blind as anyone gets. I may be somewhat opposed to GREEN people, but anyone else I don't give a DAMN what color they are! It's what's inside that counts. We're all pink inside. (Hmmmm, I may be confused again because I'd swear SOME on CD MUST be black INSIDE!) Side: True
Fear not! Trump recently made it much easier for mentally challenged and angry individuals to get guns! This means the problem will take care of itself and these bad guys with guns will end up killing themselves off! They've been TRUMPED! Those that are left will be taken care of by good guys with guns, the NRA "culture", the white supremacists, the guys with AK's in their pickup truck windows and Glocks under their seats. All this will reduce poverty 'cause drug dealers got no money and poor people can't afford the "good stuff" the white guys and rednecks can that support the drug dealers. Three cheers for Dodge City Law! Yep, it's a culture problem! Side: False
5
points
4
points
-----Fear not! Trump recently made it much easier for mentally challenged and angry individuals to get guns----- Gangs get guns from the Mexican cartels no matter what the law says. And gangs are doing almost all of the killing. Disarming the normal innocent people is pointless and would change nothing statistically in a positive direction. Side: True
4
points
3
points
3
points
2
points
2
points
Perhaps you would explain from where all the 'good jobs' would come and exactly where the 'desirable residences' in civilized neighbourhoods to which you refer are located. If you can do that then I will task you to detail how, and by whom these luxuries will be paid for and which sector(s) of the population will have to forfeit their jobs to accommodate the influx of unwanted immigrants. Side: False
3
points
-----If you can do that then I will task you to detail how, and by whom these luxuries will be paid for and which sector(s) of the population will have to forfeit their jobs to accommodate the influx of unwanted immigrants----- I'm not sure of your point. I never mentioned "luxuries", and am not sure what "luxuries" ghettos and empoverished communities get us. Side: True
2
points
1
point
|
