CreateDebate


Debate Info

144
156
True. Wait..., what? No!!!
Debate Score:300
Arguments:188
Total Votes:401
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 True. (85)
 
 Wait..., what? No!!! (84)

Debate Creator

joecavalry(37242) pic



Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.

More and more products are now coming with license agreements.
If these license agreements are so great,
why not replace warning labels with license agreements?

- Instead of this -
Warning: Do not use this electric hair dryer in the shower.
Warning:  Do no stick Q-tip into ear.

- have this -
By purchasing this product you agree to not use it in the shower.
By purchasing this product you agree to not stick it into ear.

Once this is accomplished, the next step is to apply it to guns.
By purchasing this product you agree to not be an ass-hole and murder people with it.

Then, if they try to sue the gun company, the gun company could say,
"Your honor, that gun was not manufactured for the purpose of murdering people.
In fact, our license agreement specifically states that it will not be used for the purpose.
We would like to sue the defendant for violating the license agreement."

Murderers would not only face murder charges,
they will also face license agreement violation charges.
Faced with all this litigation,
the number of murders committed in the U.S. will drop.


True.

Side Score: 144
VS.

Wait..., what? No!!!

Side Score: 156

Gun problem solved! You are welcome ;)

Side: True.
Spuds(985) Disputed
5 points

The best way to solve problems that Democrats shout about is the finger. There's no middle ground between freedom and Communists. You just defeat them. That's it. We don't negotiate our inalienable rights with Communists, tyrants, terrorists, crooks, progressives, ever.

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
TheNotorious(1) Disputed
1 point

The best way to solve problems that Democrats shout about is the finger. There's no middle ground between freedom and Communists. You just defeat them.

Shut up with your idiotic neo-Nazi bullshit you retard. Democrats are capitalists. They have nothing to do with Communism. And you didn't defeat Communism in the first place. Sure, the Soviet system collapsed: followed 16 years later by your own system.

Side: True.

The only good liberal is a dead liberal ;)

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
1 point

But I thought you were talking about lowering the murder rate?

--

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

Yeah, when I say "gun problem" I am using the liberal definition ;)

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
mosc(72) Disputed
1 point

What an idiotic proposal. I mean totally brain dead. Who in their right mind would declare: I need to buy a gun to murder my next door neighbor"! Idiot.

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

In 2015, 10,265 people died in alcohol-impaired driving crashes, accounting for nearly one-third (29%) of all traffic-related deaths in the United States.

So you tell me with each child dying from a drunk driver, why the Left is not all over the media pretending to be outraged over these innocent children's deaths? Do you have any idea how many more children are killed by drunk drivers than by guns in schools?

Where is the outrage and demand for alcohol regulations and back ground checks in public bars, nightclubs, etc.

If the real reasons for more gun control legislation is to save lives, why won't the Left propose laws mandating back ground checks in public places that sell alcohol to possible repeat DWI offenders?

I don't want this, but if your goal is to save lives with all your anti Gun rhetoric, you should be over joyed to save many thousands more lives by having background checks on people before buying alcohol in public places.

Do you have any idea how many times repeat DWI drivers continue to drink and drive? Approximately 40% of drunk drivers are repeat offenders! They drive even when their licenses are revoked!

The only way to prevent this is to do a background check before they buy that weapon of death.....ALCOHOL!

Wait, what you say? You say you don't want to be inconvenienced by background checks when buying alcohol? You say you are a law abiding citizen who would never drink and drive?

You say you don't want to pay more for alcohol to pay for those background checks for past DWI drivers?

I THOUGHT YOUR GOAL WAS TO SAVE LIVES? You expect law abiding citizens to pay more and put up with all the inconvenience from your anti gun legislation, but when it comes to your alcohol...... HANDS OFF?

A drunk driver behind the wheels of a car happens millions of times more often than some lunatic with a gun! The odds of you or your loved one being killed by a drunk driver is far higher than the odds of being shot at a concert or Church.

You are hypocrites and total jokes. You prove you could not care less about saving lives. You final goal is to take our guns.

You always spew your ludicrous reasoning why only guns should be singled out to save lives. A police state is just fine as long as it only controls one particular weapon of death..... the gun.

You say we already have alcohol restrictions? Yes, and we already have gun restrictions. You can't buy a gun under age, the same as alcohol. We can't shoot people, you can't hunt near public places and you can not drink and drive. BUT PEOPLE STILL DO IT!

IT'S NOT THE WEAPON OF CHOICE, BUT THE PERSON BEHIND THAT WEAPON. Use the brain God gave you and start addressing why people grow up to be criminals, or become irresponsible drinkers who have no problem drinking and driving.

Start addressing the core problem instead of their weapon of choice.

Side: True.

Alcohol and cars should also have a product license agreement.

By buying our product you agree to not drink it until you are drunk.

By buying out product you agree to not run over people. ;)

Side: True.

That is true but so should education. By the way accidental death is not homicide, it is not murder. While forced assisted suicide, and intentional death are still homicide. Lethal force is not, but may be. this is constitutional understanding of the use of the word murder.

Side: True.

Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.

Guns should come with free rounds.

Side: True.
Spuds(985) Disputed
5 points

Could I get some free Zombie goo targets with that purchase frog?

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

Yes, but the rounds should have a license agreement that states that you will not put them inside people ;)

Side: True.
-1 points

Hello J:

I just bought a pair of shoes.. They made me promise NOT to kick right wing ass with them.. I said OK. I lied.

excon

Side: True.
1 point

You haven't kicked any "right wing ass" on this website, and I doubt you have the balls to assault someone wearing a MAGA hat in public.

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
excon(10852) Disputed
1 point

Hello the:

Ok, you got me. I'm angry at Trump - not Trump voters. Truth is, I live in the heart of Trumplandia.. There's just too many of 'em to stomp on. Besides that, I don't wear my politics on my sleeve. I don't have any Obama stickers on my car. I mind my business.

But, let me come upon a fellow wearing Nazi regalia, and I'll punch him till I can't punch him anymore..

excon

Side: True.
2 points

But the purpose of a gun is to kill otherwise it’s not worth having is it ?

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
Flatlander(63) Disputed
1 point

Guns are not evil, they actually perform a very necessary function in civilian life which is to allow weaker humans to defend themselves against stronger humans. I know of no other tool that can perform this task as effectively as guns do.

Side: True.
Dermot(5461) Disputed
1 point

Where did I say guns are evil , I said they’re designed to kill you agree yet you dispute and downvote me ..... strange

By the way a gun is not a “tool “

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
1 point

they actually perform a very necessary function in civilian life which is to allow weaker humans to defend themselves against stronger humans.

You're an idiot. Guns don't "defend". They spit toxic chunks of lead into other humans. If you think that's what "defence" is then there is only one explanation: you're retarded.

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
mrcatsam(526) Clarified
1 point

Except for the fact that we shouldn't have to defend ourselves against stronger humans in such a civilised world.

Only America's military should use guns.

Side: True.
outlaw60(13929) Clarified
0 points

Dermot it is designed to kill and puts wild game in the freezer and food on the table for a family so you got it right. Damn good job and perfectly done.

Side: True.
EvilNom(98) Clarified
0 points

Dermot it is designed to kill and puts wild game in the freezer and food on the table for a family

Do you hunt or do you just say these things while you bring your legal murder weapon to the grocery store?

Side: True.
FromWithin(6819) Disputed
-1 points

In 2015, 10,265 people died in alcohol-impaired driving crashes, accounting for nearly one-third (29%) of all traffic-related deaths in the United States.

So you tell me with each child dying from a drunk driver, why the Left is not all over the media pretending to be outraged over these innocent children's deaths? Do you have any idea how many more children are killed by drunk drivers than by guns in schools?

Where is the outrage and demand for alcohol regulations and back ground checks in public bars, nightclubs, etc.

If the real reasons for more gun control legislation is to save lives, why won't the Left propose laws mandating back ground checks in public places that sell alcohol to possible repeat DWI offenders?

I don't want this, but if your goal is to save lives with all your anti Gun rhetoric, you should be over joyed to save many thousands more lives by having background checks on people before buying alcohol in public places.

Do you have any idea how many times repeat DWI drivers continue to drink and drive? Approximately 40% of drunk drivers are repeat offenders! They drive even when their licenses are revoked!

The only way to prevent this is to do a background check before they buy that weapon of death.....ALCOHOL!

Wait, what you say? You say you don't want to be inconvenienced by background checks when buying alcohol? You say you are a law abiding citizen who would never drink and drive?

You say you don't want to pay more for alcohol to pay for those background checks for past DWI drivers?

I THOUGHT YOUR GOAL WAS TO SAVE LIVES? You expect law abiding citizens to pay more and put up with all the inconvenience from your anti gun legislation, but when it comes to your alcohol...... HANDS OFF?

A drunk driver behind the wheels of a car happens millions of times more often than some lunatic with a gun! The odds of you or your loved one being killed by a drunk driver is far higher than the odds of being shot at a concert or Church.

You are hypocrites and total jokes. You prove you could not care less about saving lives. You final goal is to take our guns.

You always spew your ludicrous reasoning why only guns should be singled out to save lives. A police state is just fine as long as it only controls one particular weapon of death..... the gun.

You say we already have alcohol restrictions? Yes, and we already have gun restrictions. You can't buy a gun under age, the same as alcohol. We can't shoot people, you can't hunt near public places and you can not drink and drive. BUT PEOPLE STILL DO IT!

IT'S NOT THE WEAPON OF CHOICE, BUT THE PERSON BEHIND THAT WEAPON. Use the brain God gave you and start addressing why people grow up to be criminals, or become irresponsible drinkers who have no problem drinking and driving.

Start addressing the core problem instead of their weapon of choice.

Side: True.
Dermot(5461) Disputed
3 points

Oh do shut up you idiotic brute , a gun is designed to kill you fucking half - wit a car is designed to transport people , goods etc car deaths are accidental gun deaths are mostly not .

The hilarious thing is you claim to be a “Christian “ and idiots like you actually think if Jesus roamed the earth today he would carry a gun ...... Ignore

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
1 point

*In 2015, 10,265 people died in alcohol-impaired driving crashes, accounting for nearly one-third (29%) of all traffic-related deaths in the United States.

That's awesome. Nobody died from nuclear weapons during that period, therefore nuclear weapons are safe and should be legalised immediately.

Take your retarded logical fallacies back to the Westboro Baptist Church you militant wingnut retard.

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

It seems, Joe, that you're living in a fantasy world. Guns aren't the only thing used in murders, for one, so I doubt that it would drop as significantly as you think. If it dropped at all, that is. Second, how are license agreement violation charges going to dissuade people from killing each other?

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
0 points

It seems, Joe, that you're living in a fantasy world.

Oh, the pure, unadulterated irony. Over thirty thousand completely preventable deaths per year, but HE'S living in the fantasy world?? As retards go, you're a large one.

You're literally delusional kid. Literally.

Side: True.
1 point

preventable

And how would you prevent those thirty thousand gun deaths? By the way, most of those are suicides by people who were able to legally obtain the firearm they used.

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
outlaw60(13929) Disputed
1 point

NOM you want to speak up on the Chicago gun violence ????????? Come on Dummy nut up !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
outlaw60(13929) Disputed
1 point

NOM you ain't got nothing but an ignorant pie hole !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

We'll just have everything have an end user license agreement ;)

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
1 point

Agreements are worthless when people will disobey them regardless. You act like everyone wants to kill someone and we need to put into place laws preventing them from doing so. Fact of the matter is that normal, everyday people don't want to murder their wife and kids.

Side: True.
1 point

How does this work ? - Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.

When one inherits family guns should the guberment make me sign a license agreement?

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

Just make it so that if you want to use a gun, you need a license. Just like driving a car ;)

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
1 point

My AR-15 and AK are very nice weapons for which i can legally purchase !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
0 points

In order to fully comprehend the threat of gun violence in the United States in 2018, here are five shocking facts.

Three of the 10 deadliest mass shootings in modern American history have occurred in the last eight months.

It is more dangerous to be a school student than a deployed service member in 2018. You are twice as likely to be shot dead at school, than in active service.

An American woman is shot dead by her partner every 16 hours.

One in three children live in a home with a gun.

In an average day, 20 American children are shot.

With statistics like that, it’s only a matter of time until we’re covering the next horrific – yet entirely inevitable – mass shooting.

Wonder how many children will be shot today in the U S ?

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
1 point

Where did you get any of these numbers? You haven't sourced anything.

Side: True.
Dermot(5461) Disputed
1 point

What not do a bit of reasearch ? .........................................

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!