CreateDebate


Debate Info

Debate Score:7
Arguments:6
Total Votes:10
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Has the Left created their new political correct biology books for public schools? (5)

Debate Creator

Cuaroc(8829) pic



Has the Left created their new political correct biology books for public schools?

Everything we ever learned about our bodies, how they are designed, how sex is suppose to work between a man and woman, how we have two genders, a male and female, etc. etc., has been thrown upside down.
These scientific truths no longer jive with the Left's PC Humanistic scripture.

Every day the Left keeps discovering new genders. The last I heard, they may have fabricated up to 80 separate genders! ROFLOL!

How are they going to keep up with the constant updates to our science books? Well, like our Constitution, they will just have to declare that our science books are living documents that change with the culture.

I wonder at the beginning of school year, when the new age Biology books say there are 80 different genders, will this answer still be correct on the final exam when there will now be 83 separate genders? I would buy stock in paper because the Biology books will be outdated by midterm.

I many times ask myself, how could any intelligent person swallow this politically correct garbage, sanctioning every unnatural sexual orientation or gender disorder, as being ok and normal, rather than being some sexual dysfunction.

This political correct world has become so fearful of offending someone, we must be brow beaten to except and sanction any unnatural orientation as being natural and normal. All people should be treated with respect, and not discriminted against, but this does not mean we sanction their claimed orientations as normal.

It says in the Bilbe, When men reject the revelation of God in nature, they become fools but they think of themselves as wise (Romans 1:22).
If that's not describing to a tee what is gong on in this world, I don't know what is.

We actually have College Professors who think they are the enlightened ones pushing this PC drivel. Trump is the result of this PC insanity. Americans are fed up with it, and were it not for the impressionable young people being indoctrinated in schools, this PC madness would have already been thrown into the dust bin of history.

The Bible speaks to these types of things happening in the end times, whereby mankind becomes like fools, rebelling against what is obviously natural and true, and lifts up what is unnatural.

What else can explain this unbelievable assault on obvious intellectual truth, and this dysfunctional fixation on unnatural sexuality and so called newly discovered genders.
-FromWithin
Add New Argument
Cuaroc(8829)
1 point

Now we will hear from the intolerant Left calling anyone who dares gives these opinions, as being homophobic, genderphobic, womenphobic, you name it.

They must shut down and censor such speech when it goes against their political correct humanistic dogma.

-FromWithin

Support Dispute Clarify
FromWithnBot(43)
1 point

• Democrats support no restriction abortions!

• ...but Hilary Clinton...!

• Hogwash!

• Jesus love you...you're going to burn in hell!

• You fools!

• You spew lies and deception as always!

• Anti-Christian bigots!

• Republicans can do no wrong!

• Democrats can do no right!

• I masturbate to Donald Trump!

-FromWithin

Support Dispute Clarify
↑ Hide Replies
Cuaroc(8829) Clarified
1 point

• ...but Hilary Clinton...!

But her emails! Would be better

Support Dispute Clarify
Grenache(6053)
1 point

I don't know what academia puts in biology and sex ed books these days, because I'm too old to have seen the latest, and my boys are too young to be in that type of class already. But what I do know is I would trust virtually any academic source on this topic over the personal opinion of what FromWithin thinks should or should not be taught.

Support Dispute Clarify
seanB(950)
1 point

There's this perception out there that extreme leftist propaganda regarding gender is accepted in peer-reviewed academia. IT ISN'T.

Biologists know that there are fundamental markers for sex and gender: chromosomes, neurochemistry, genitalia etc. A person can only be one of two sexes, in the biological sense. Sex is not quite the same as gender, but it is closely related. And although neofeminists and sociologists like to assert that gender is a social construct, they neglect to mention that gender is almost universally binary, has significant biological underpinnings, and that transsexualism and transgenderism are results of defects in the normative human biological blueprint.

Disclaimer: This says NOTHING about the morality of transgenderism, so for any crazy justice warriors on here who want to call me a bigot or whatever, I'm speaking in terms of biological and evolutionary facts. But I'm not making moral judgements.

Support Dispute Clarify
↑ Hide Replies
FromWithin(8241) Disputed
0 points

Try posting on the debate that was actually created and you might get a response. To post on the site Clown's copied debate means you get a bunch of insults against me, and absolutey no inteligent response to your points.

The original debate will always be down a few lines with the exact title.

He NEVER creates his own debates. This is all fake debating to get points, and he gets points from the deceptive people I have banned. They chase my every word like stalkers. Sad how insecure some people are.

Support Dispute Clarify

Browse More Debates