CreateDebate


Debate Info

Debate Score:74
Arguments:45
Total Votes:84
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Here's your chance: Debate TERMINATOR! (42)

Debate Creator

TERMINATOR(6780) pic



Here's your chance: Debate TERMINATOR!

Post the issue you would like to debate with him and, if one catches his fancy, he'll try out the challenge function with you.

 

Add New Argument

Let's Debate: Who is a bigger liberal idiot? iamdavidh or Bohemian-------------------

3 points

How does it feel knowing that the two biggest liberal idiots are like, way smarter than you? :p

5 points

If his IQ score is above 7 and his only sources of information aren't MSNBC and CNN, I'd say hes smarter that you. :P

Hellno(17753) Clarified
2 points

Bohemian? I never took him as a liberal idiot? Huh?

3 points

He is an liberal, but he could never admit it.----------------------------------------

iamdavidh, jessald, and andsoccer16 are the three primary enemies I can remember from the good ol' days, yet only David seems to still come on. I take it Bohemian has replaced the other two, dear ally?

Yes, ostensibly, jessald and andsoccer16 are gone for good with zero sightings even longer than you. As for iamdavidh, he is become even more annoying than the Rachel Maddow Show, it is like he is a tape recording and plays it on CD.

Bohemian was after your disappearance, and although he won't admit being liberal, he is. He has all the talking points of liberal idiocy. No sign of him lately either.

3 points

Now that ThePyg has inspired me to come out of the closet on this site with regards to drug use, I would greatly appreciate the honor to debate that topic with you, provided I may take the position in favor of use or legalization.

3 points

I second this notion, because my name was mentioned and that's usually a good enough excuse to endorse a debate.

Hmmm, a very typical topic of debate. Maybe, maybe not - we shall see.

3 points

I'd like to debate you on the grounds that you are a pompous cunt.

My supporting argument? You referred to yourself in the third person in the debate description.

I win.

Nah I'm just messing with ya' ;)

2 points

I didn't see this before I posted, so, sorry for repeating your sentiment .

3 points

How about: What sort of clown speaks about themselves in the third person?

2 points

Ah, Rice, it has been too long.

This really doesn't make for much of a debate: I am the kind of clown who speaks about himself in the third person.

It has indeed been too long, what have you been up to? I can't get used to the Angela Lansbury Avatar, I still imagine you look like that actor with the wine glass or whatever.

I'm well aware of your capacity for self worship by the way.

Are you coming back to try dominate the leaderboard again?

2 points

Space exploration is a waste of cash and the moon landing was not for the sake of science, it's was to win a dick waving contest with the Soviet Union.

I like the first part of your debate proposal: space exploration is a waste of cash.

I want to wait a few days first and see if anybody else comes up with a good idea before I commit myself to one.

2 points

I'll debate anything, really.

Here's some debate topics, though.

Religious:

Why do atheists and theists debate so strongly on religion when there is no absolute way to be certain is either of their beliefs are correct?

Creationism has superior arguments when compared to the Big Bang Theory.

Science:

All of our scientific theories for the start of the universe are flawed.

Philosophy:

Subjective morality Vs Objective morality

1 point

Of course there is no absolute way to be certain which is correct. The difference is being reasonably certain. There is no evidence for God existing, much the same way that there is no evidence for fairys existing. Why would you believe in something that has zero evidence?

Creationism has superior arguments when compared to the big bang? How?

It's possible that all of our scientific theories are flawed. How does that make Creationism any more credible though? At least science has evidence, facts, and theories that make sense of the former two.

Cynical(1948) Disputed
1 point

Of course there is no absolute way to be certain which is correct. The difference is being reasonably certain. There is no evidence for God existing, much the same way that there is no evidence for fairys existing. Why would you believe in something that has zero evidence?

I do not; I am an atheist. How my suggested debate topics are phrased isn't necessarily my personal positions on those topics.

Creationism has superior arguments when compared to the big bang? How?

I feel as there are reasonably valid arguments for both sides in that potential debate. Alas, I will not attempt to argue here, as this is not the debate to do so.

______

I'll give my personal opinions on these topics, though, as to avoid any more confusion.

Why do atheists and theists debate so strongly on religion when there is no absolute way to be certain is either of their beliefs are correct?

(There's no straightforward answer to this, so I'll try to summarize my position: For the sake of the debate, most likely, and to attempt to prove the opposing beliefs incorrect.)

Creationism has superior arguments when compared to the Big Bang Theory.

(I support the Big Bang theory over Creationism.)

All of our scientific theories for the start of the universe are flawed.

(I support the scientific theories for the cause of the universe over the religious ones.)

Subjective morality Vs Objective morality

(I support subjective morality.)

ricedaragh(2494) Clarified
1 point

This was about debating Terminator .

1 point

No opinion of any of my debate suggestions, then.

Well, I guess you win. I like your first religious debate idea, I'll go challenge you now.

1 point

Yeah... I think he came back for one day??? So?

I think he came back for one day?

I'll debate that.

1 point

No need, you have already won that debate with your reply. ;)

1 point

As President of CD, I would like to debate on how America is the best country in the world.

1 point

I'll debate that it isn't, if you like.

Hellno(17753) Disputed
1 point

Talking to yourself again?

Hellno(17753) Disputed
1 point

You're not American!

Apollo(1608) Disputed
1 point

Who the fvck is this guy?

http://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee80/ bsbaker6595/hehe-1.jpg

-

Your incredible, intelligent, strong, awesome, merciful, great, but most of all humble President,

Apollo

How about this for title: The idea of so called "Democracy" is simply a weapon used by the West to destroy any independent countries or governments that oppose its imperialistic hegemony.

Nah, seriously, I don't even have the time for a proper "full on" debate, but I still can't resist throwing in my two cents, not that it matters anyway, i.e.

ON WHY YOUR OPINION DOESN'T MATTER

Too bad, that seems like a good idea. Could be simplified a bit, but it is workable.

Who do politicians work for? "Those that voted for them" or "Those that contributed money to their campaigns."

Who profits more from illegal drugs? "Drug lords" or "Governments"

Any solution a government has to any given problem is usually "worse than the problem" or a "Vast improvement"

Just a few ideas in 30 seconds or less.

1 point

I don't think TERMINATOR and I would disagree on much, so I'll stay out of this one. But anyway, how are you? I am curious about one thing, what are your thoughts on the so-called "fine-tuning" of the universe? Link