Home Owners Kill Intruders Without Fear of Prosecution?
Should home owners be allowed to kill anyone that breaks into their home without fear of prosecution?
Yes
Side Score: 39
|
No
Side Score: 4
|
|
|
|
The Castle Doctrine in Texas allows you to use lethal force without having to back down without any repercussions. It also extends into your vehicle, but you have to be in your vehicle at the time of use for that to be true unless you are a concealed handgun licensee. Then you can use lethal force whenever your life or anyone else's life is threatened. Side: yes
2
points
This is true. If someone is intruding your home, you don't know there intentions. If they are trying to harm your family, you should by all means go all out to protect yourself and others around you. Killing them would merely be for self-defense. If someone was trying to harm you and you killed them in order to protect yourself, should you really be punished for that? No way of course not. Side: yes
If they are breaking into my house I am going to defend my family no matter what, So I am going to shoot whether that kills them or not. We should not be held accountable for that. It all depends I guess in the place you live and what you do for a living. My brothers wife is serving time for killing two intruders in her house. She is in the armed forces and was sentenced because according to the court she is trained to kill. Is that fair no it's not Side: yes
2
points
If someone lurks in your home at night after sneakily breaking in, you have no freaking idea what they're thinking of doing to you and your family. They might have an automatic weapon for all you know. So, it should be fair game to kill or incapacitate them without prosecution. But you might be screwed if you go out of your way to do it, and then it turns out to just be some poor homeless kid who wants to eat. Oops... Side: yes
2
points
1
point
|
They should be protected by the same laws regarding self-defence as anyone else. If they injured or killed someone because they believe they were being threatened, and the force they used was reasonable considering the circumstances, they would get off. That's good enough. Home owners shouldn't get free license to spray somebody with bullets just because they stepped into their lawn, or stab a burglar 50 times with a knife for revenge, or any of a host of scenarios that are possible if they could kill without fear of prosecution. Side: No
|