CreateDebate


Debate Info

39
4
Yes No
Debate Score:43
Arguments:18
Total Votes:44
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes (14)
 
 No (4)

Debate Creator

Hellno(17753) pic



Home Owners Kill Intruders Without Fear of Prosecution?

Should home owners be allowed to kill anyone that breaks into their home without fear of prosecution?

Cat

Yes

Side Score: 39
VS.

No

Side Score: 4
5 points

I say yes in the sense that there should still be an investigation. If the police find no evidence to suggest that it WASN'T in self-defense, the killer should not be prosecuted.

Side: yes
3 points

I agree with you but should they have to attempt to just wound the intruder first? Like shooting him in the leg? I think I would try to do that but I don't think it should be taken into consideration during the investigation.

Side: yes
5 points

Trying to wound someone is gibberish. If someone breaks into your house, the last thought on your mind should be "I should be careful on where I shoot him". At that point, it's shoot to eliminate the threat. Aiming for the leg is asking to killed first.

Side: yes
5 points

The Castle Doctrine in Texas allows you to use lethal force without having to back down without any repercussions. It also extends into your vehicle, but you have to be in your vehicle at the time of use for that to be true unless you are a concealed handgun licensee. Then you can use lethal force whenever your life or anyone else's life is threatened.

Side: yes
4 points

Yes, I think you should be able to protect yourself, your family, your belongings by whatever means it takes. If you have to kill an intruder, then so be it. You shouldn't be prosecuted for that in my opinion.

Side: yes
2 points

This is true. If someone is intruding your home, you don't know there intentions. If they are trying to harm your family, you should by all means go all out to protect yourself and others around you. Killing them would merely be for self-defense. If someone was trying to harm you and you killed them in order to protect yourself, should you really be punished for that? No way of course not.

Side: yes
4 points

If they are breaking into my house I am going to defend my family no matter what, So I am going to shoot whether that kills them or not. We should not be held accountable for that.

It all depends I guess in the place you live and what you do for a living.

My brothers wife is serving time for killing two intruders in her house. She is in the armed forces and was sentenced because according to the court she is trained to kill. Is that fair no it's not

Side: yes
2 points

If someone lurks in your home at night after sneakily breaking in, you have no freaking idea what they're thinking of doing to you and your family. They might have an automatic weapon for all you know.

So, it should be fair game to kill or incapacitate them without prosecution.

But you might be screwed if you go out of your way to do it, and then it turns out to just be some poor homeless kid who wants to eat. Oops...

Side: yes
2 points

i say yes i have heard of burglers breking in to a home getting themselves hurt and sue is that right no and if someonewith a gun breaks into our home and lets say tries to rape your child you are a horrible person if you do not stop or kill them

Side: yes
1 point

i think that we should be able to shoot intruders because if lots of people do it there will be a bigger threat to invaders which also would decrease crime rate a lot

Side: Yes
1 point

What the hell just happened? I don't even remember this debate?

Side: Yes

If someone breaks into my house, I should have be scared about being sued for deafening myself.

Side: Yes
1 point

No.. That would be cruel. Intruders mat include anyone. It could even be an innocent chap.

A mentally challenged person who has no idea of what he or she is doing, a small time thief who is forced for a robbery.

Side: No
Merlin13(1258) Disputed
3 points

Nice thought, but apparently you've never lived where there are meth freaks or where home invasions are common.

Side: yes
1 point

They should be protected by the same laws regarding self-defence as anyone else. If they injured or killed someone because they believe they were being threatened, and the force they used was reasonable considering the circumstances, they would get off. That's good enough.

Home owners shouldn't get free license to spray somebody with bullets just because they stepped into their lawn, or stab a burglar 50 times with a knife for revenge, or any of a host of scenarios that are possible if they could kill without fear of prosecution.

Side: No
1 point

What in the hell was this even about? I don't see a link or anything?

Side: No