This is my personal opinion and you do not have to agree. I know homosexuals exist and am not denying it.

This is what forums are for. However on a debate website you will be challenged, as per the nature of the community.

I say that the behavior is a perverted act because it is not something I would do, nor is it what the majority of people do, nor is it something that would involve the "natural" purpose of sex--reproduction.

You just condemned the entirety of sex to "perversion." The vast majority of sex that anyone has is not for reproduction, but pleasure.

Secondly, what is perverse is merely opinion.

Tell me which of the following you perform (or receive/enjoy):

Fellatio, cunnilingus, rimming, group sex, anal sex, vaginal sex, fisting, anal play, fingering, role play, furry play, bondage, sadomasochism, humiliation, autofellatio, masturbation, exhibitionism, cougars (or MILF), grannies (or GMILF), daddies, silver daddies, rape fantasies, copraphilia, vorarephilia, watersports, gore, zoophilia, necrophilia, pederasty, ephebophilia, gloryholes, bukakke, transgendered, cross dressers etc.

All of these (and more) are enjoyed around the world. At the end of the day, what we choose to approve of comes down to opinion and personal preference. It helps that we try to get along with each other by agreeing on general criteria like "if it hurts someone, or degrades them, it should be banned" but there are always disagreements and most of this isn't illegal. Most of it isn't homosexual either.

The point is that you can't condemn homosexual sex as perverse without making one reflect on the perversity of sex itself.

There are sociological and psychological factors for homosexual behaviors, which would take up too much space here, but we are starting to see the effect it is having on our children when the adults are pushing it on the rest of society.

I've observed that the newer generations are each becoming more and more open to their true sexualities. Teenage boys and girls are testing their curiosity and finding out that they are bisexual and that it isn't something to be ashamed of.

By being told it's Ok, by adults, children get mixed signals from their peers. Children are very cruel to each other, and sex is one of the things that they are too emotionally immature to handle in the first place.

Which is why we should be eliminating the stigma on sex and sexuality caused by close-minded people. Children simply mimic their parents, and if we make our society tolerant of sex and sexuality, children will reflect this.

When you add "perverted" behaviors into the mix, you create even more confusion within the young mind. For one child to admit to being a homosexual is akin to social death: undoubtedly they will be bullied and teased.

Not any longer. Being homosexual or bisexual isn't a crime, and in many modern, liberal cities being openly homosexual or bisexual is accepted.

Do you know what is sad? Some of my friends, who are older adults now, regret that only recently they may test the waters to determine if they are bisexual. They followed the heterosexual path for thirty years because of a stigma created by bigots and insecure people, but now they can comfortably find themselves.

Personally, I don't care what two adults do behind closed doors. I just think that I do not want them telling young children that is perfectly ok to engage in homosexual behaviors.

Creating a stigma leads to repression, which causes all sorts of nasty behaviours. It is much healthier for society to accept these things warmly, because it leads to less bitterness at having to pretend to be something you aren't.

There are lots of children that are just sexually curious, and I don't want children exposed to this kind of behavior. I don't care for open sexual behavior in public with heterosexuals adults either.

Kissing? Kissing doesn't harm anybody to witness it.

Homosexuals won't give BIRTH right?

Homosexuals are perfectly capable of producing biological offspring and many of them do. Many others would adopt, were they permitted to, and by doing so they would still contribute to the propogation of the species by caring for children that already exist.

It TRULY will reduce our POPULATION.

I cannot imagine a worse fate! Just kidding. Homosexuality's been around forever and it hasn't wiped us out yet. I don't think we need to worry.

Can you imagine the world with gays and less population? how will the world SURVIVE?

Same as it always has, I'd imagine.

1.The population of the world is growing too fast and is too large and, anyway, the population of homosexuals isn't that big

2.People are born homosexual or not homosexual, living near someone who is homosexual won't make you one. One of my close relatives is homosexual and I'm still straight

I could never choose to be gay, and respectively I do not believe gay persons could choose to be straight. If I didn't choose my sexuality, why should I assume another could?

Homosexuals do have the same rights as heterosexuals. They just can't marry another homosexual.

Homosexuals are denied marriage and the state-created incentives that come with it.

Homosexuals are denied the ability to adopt children.

Homosexuals are denied the ability to serve in the military. If you are gay openly in the military you are discharged.

Homosexuals may not donate blood.

Homosexual activity isn't natural its a choice and a illness.

So you're telling me that you choose to be aroused by women, or transsexuals, or whatever perverse fantasy catches your eye? That is what you are arguing here, that your fantasies are entirely your choice with none of it out of your control.

Heterosexuals have the right to marry the consenting adult they wish to marry. Homosexuals do not. This is kind of where the problem is.

Homosexuality occurs in nature, so, by definition, it is natural. It also occurs in all countries and all cultures, so it is natural for humans and not just animals.

its not an illness its a personal choice no one is asking you to agree. and its a personal choice if you choose not to agree

The problem is picking which deity's rules to follow.

On and your analysis is flawed. Your forgot to take into account that there are about as many lesbians as gays so you are still left with the same number of women to choose from.