CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.
Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.
You can share this debate in three different ways:
#1
#2
#3
Paste this URL into an email or IM:
Click here to send this debate via your default email application.
Click here to login and CreateDebate will send an email for you.
Is Homosexuality a Mental Disorder?
Is Homosexuality a mental disorder. It's your choice if you want to support it or not but there's no denying it is a mental disorder. It is unnatural and is not the way that the brain is supposed to be designed. We are supposed to be attracted to the opposite sex.
And yes, homosexuality is found in nature but so is a bunch of other mental disorders. Pedophillia is classified as a mental disorder so why shouldn't homosexuality be as well. Pedophillia is found in nature but it is still a mental disorder.
"Mental illness refers to a wide range of mental health conditions — disorders that affect your mood, thinking and behavior"
Disorder-disrupt the systematic functioning or neat arrangement of.
So given the definition we can clearly see that homosexuality is a Mental Disorder. I come to this conclusion because in the definition is says disorder(definition above) which relates in this definition because being homosexual disrupts the systematic functioning of the reproductive system. additionally it is a disorder that effects your mood thinking and behavior for the same sex : )
Your original argument was Homosexuality is not a disease I proved you wrong there so you changed the word from disease to mental disorder but I still got you bud.
I agree with what you are saying. Just one thing, don't let the Left indoctrinate you into believing there are many Gay animals in nature. There are not.
They bring up Geese, who never have sex with the same sex geese, but merely pair up possibly because there were no other female geese to pair up with at the time.
I have asked many times for someone to show me any Gay animal that we would all know. There are no cats, dogs, horses, cows, Lions, etc. etc. who are homosexual and who would only have sex with the same sex. Sure there are some animals such as dogs or Apes that would hump anything that moves, but that is not being Gay. They still have sex with the opposite sex.
If Homosexuality is a naturally occuring thing in nature, WHY ARE NONE OF THE ANIMALS WE ALL KNOW GAY?
We all know that Homosexuality is consensual and nobody is denying people's right to live as they choose.
What people always miss, and I believe deliberately so, is that we are not talking about their right to act on their urges. We are saying their urges are not normal, are not natural, and not something we as the human race should be sanctioning as normal to our impressionable chidren.
Kids will experiment with thngs as they go through puberty if we are telling them that it is a normal thing. Our children should be taught basic biology and how our bodies are meant to be. Anything else they can do on their own with no sanctioning from teachers.
There should be no programming of our children's minds of how homosexuality is a normal natural thing. We should be teaching our children in schools to respect all people no matter how they look or talk, WITHOUT giving special mention to any political correct sexual orientation, or other controversial subjects.
Do we teach kids that pedophilia is ok as long as people don't act on their desires? NO, we don't even bring up the subject to our impressionable kids.
That's how it should be for all controversial subjects in public schools. If parents want to teach their kids about these subjects, they can do so in their own homes.
Yes, most people know common sense biology. Those on the Left are very insecure people who can't stand hearing anyone speaking to common sense when it is at odds with their political correctness.
Are you incapable of learning? People have given you so many examples of homosexuality in nature. Wtf? At least adapt your arguments to new information.
LOL, it is you incapable of learning. I checked into the few examples people give and guess what? Most of them are pure deception from the Left AS ALWAYS!
For exmple they spew deceptive lies about Geese. Two male Geese who pair up DO NOT HAVE SEX!
There may have been a lack of female Geese to pair with, and these Geese paired up for whatever reason. THIS DOES NOT MAKE THEM GAY!
You refused to answer my question as do all Left wing phonies trying to push their LGBT agendas.
Show me some Gay animals we all know such as pets, livestock, Zoo animals, etc. etc.
WHY ARE THERE NO HOMOSEXUAL ANIMALS IN OUR PETS? If it is naturally occuring in nature, we would all be seeing examples.
You are LGBT activists who refuse to adapt to the facts!
Would you be happy to know your only son is gay? I mean after he dies your history dies......no continuity?
Gay is just corruption. Is a virus.
Every original thing has a fake and gay is corruption.
I have no respect for people who support Gay.
I cannot argue with them. I mean what is the natural result of sexual and asexual reproduction........to be prolific.
Had the world started with gays: adam and Adam, which of you would be existing now? And when did gay set in? Just one stupid corruption.
God burnt down a whole city cos of gays cos its just so disgusting. Man and man? Just for pleasure? It should be abolished......i think muslims who kill other religious groups' members should stop and start targetting gays and am sure they will go to heaven for that.
Proverbs 22:15►New International Version Folly is bound up in the heart of a child, but the rod of discipline will drive it far away.
This foolishness of gay arose in the early days of the human race. We weren't firm enough with the eradication rod. Even God tried and killed a lot of them yet this virus still survives. One surviving gay probably infected an innocent teenager; the teeanagers tranfered the virus to about two friends, two friends continued to spread untill now we that we can't hold it no more. Cos now the human race is now a majured being and it has formed part of its characteristics. But remember all our characters cannot be good that is claiming saint or self righteousness. We must accept our errors and correct them. The human race needs therapy of Gays.....
It is the foolishness we didn't do away with.
I hate Gay. Its just demonic.
Even the animal and plant race are far better in their natural development than the human race. They are just disciplined
Come on. I'm waiting. What evidence do you want? Have you ever heard of an unfalsifiable fact? It is what the majority of your views are: you believe something and there can never be any evidence that could ever exist that could dispute it.
So now you are comparing animals to humans. Cos some mentally ill animals are being gay so its okay for humans too to be gay? Morality... Morality.... Morality....
Animals are not Gay. No one has ever showed us a Gay pet. Why not? If homosexuaity is a naturally occurng thing, there would be Gay pets that have no attraction for the opposite sex.
All you deceptive people do is show animals that when sexually aroused would hump anything that moves, and then you call it homosexual behavior.
LOL, don't bother responding. I have better things to do than banter words with deceptive people pushing their political correct agendas.
Maybe I misunderstood but we do teach children the biology of reproduction. If we wanted to teach our children natural and not natural we would explain to them the following: We have two goals in life
(1) to survive
(2) that your genetic lineage survives
So, boys when you choose your mate make sure she is healthy with good genetic traits. Of course, animals sens those traits and are attracted to those healthy females....
Today, our planet is overpopulated with humans. Limited resources force us naturally to limit our reproduction. Who is to say that homosexuality isn't the natural response to overpopulation? That if our goal in life is to survive and that reproduction limits our chances and our offspring to survive, the natural response is to not reproduce. Maybe being attracted to the animal that doesn't allow reproduction is the natural response.
PS. This is an idea that I didn't look to verify. So, if you could read it and point out exactly where you start to disagree in my logic. Or or, you could also accept that it is a possibility... :)
So what you are sayng is that we should teach that abnormal things are normal, even if it goes totally against biology, so long as it may help reduce the population?
That's like saying abortion is ok because it is better to kill babies to help reduce our population.
Here's a novel idea... how about BIRTH CONTROL, and CHOOSING not to live promiscuously? This would help our popultion rather than killing people and telling our children that abnormal sex is normal.
I always like going the honest route when talking to our children.
No that is not what I am saying. I will teach my children reproduction the way our biology forces us to do it. I will also teach my children to use birth control and be responsible when they have sex.
What I am suggesting though is that reproduction is no longer helping our species survival. Maybe the natural consequences of that is sex without the purpose of reproduction. Sex without the purposes of reproduction opens the doors to sex with people you are purely attracted to.
On a biological point of view, sex for pleasure is not "natural". Not many animals have sex for pleasure. Both homosexuals and heterosexuals have sex for pleasure.
My point is today there is sex to reproduce and sex for pleasure. Of course, if homosexuals have sex to reproduce, they didn't understand how reproduction works.
However, if homosexual have sex for pleasure, how is it different than heterosexuals who have sex for pleasure?
You are showing the difference between animals and humans, and likewise an argument against the theory of evolution.
Animals work off instinct and what nature tells them. They most times don't choose to have sex for fun because they are animals and bound by their nature. This is why you never see Gay pets.
Humans are not just another animal species as evolutionists would have you believe. We have a mind that chooses to live any way we choose. We are not bound by nature or instinct. We can choose to go against the natural norms of biology.
Homosexuals have sex with the same sex because that is their desire to do so. No one is forcing them to do so.
Pedophiles have desires for children and some say they were born that way. Does that make it a natural thing?
Transgener people believe they are not the correct gender.
Anorexic people believe they are fat when they are actually skinny.
What do all these different desires and feelings have in common? They are not normal or natural. People can say they are born that way, but it matters not why and how they came to have these desires.
Many people and doctors believe they are all some sort of mental disorders.
It matters not why or how or when these desires manefested themselves. What matters is that these desires are not normal and we should not be teaching our children that they are.
Animals work off instinct and what nature tells them. They most times don't choose to have sex for fun because they are animals and bound by their nature. This is why you never see Gay pets.
Yes so far I agree.
Humans are not just another animal species as evolutionists would have you believe. We have a mind that chooses to live any way we choose. We are not bound by nature or instinct. We can choose to go against the natural norms of biology.
Okay, I do believe that human are different from animals in a way that they are animal conscious of their existence. This consciousness does give them the possibility to make choices that aren't only to survive or reproduce. These are choices other animals rarely make. Although, I do believe that human are also animals and that if need be they will do anything to survive if their existence was threatened. What I mean is humans can be bound by nature and instinct if they need to survive. I believe we agree here right?
I understand the point you are making. The one that I am making is that sex for pleasure goes against the natural norm of biology. Our biology is to reproduce.
Therefore, homosexuals having sex for pleasure is just as unnatural as heterosexuals having sex for pleasure because they both go against the purposes of our biology.
Who says? This is not our objective goal, it's a goal influenced on us by society. Humans create their own goals, whether it's to become rich and successful or to find their true love.
"Who is to say that homosexuality isn't the natural response to overpopulation?"
An interesting theory, but completely an utterly wrong. Records of homosexuality date back thousands of years - before the issue of overpopulation existed.
Homosexuality goes back as far as Ancient China, where homosexuality was largely accepted and indulged in. This is similar to Roman society (homosexual relationships were more about power than attraction... although that was the same for heterosexual relationships too, lol) where brothels dedicated to homosexuality were common and the rich often had male sex slaves.
So, as much as I'm sure homophobes (not saying you are one, it's quite a unique theory) would love to believe that homosexuality is a result of overpopulation, it is most certainly not true by any means. Sorry.
Yea this is definitely an invented and unverified theory. Someone gotta have the imagination ! ;)
So argument wise, my goal was to suggest the possibility of homosexuality being natural human response. But the fact that it dates counters the theory.
As for the goals of life, these are the two goals common to every living species. I understand that humans have other goals. but these two goals are definitely not imposed by society.
I mean if survival is not a necessary goal of the living, that means there is some wiring issues going on on the person's head.
Now my point was mostly about making the parallel between heterosexual and homosexual sex. That if one is unnatural, the other is partly unnatural as well.
You're definitely right about survival being a goal, I take back my statement about that being subjective. In my opinion, humans have two main goals: one is survival, like you said, and is the one true goal shared across all humans, whilst the second goal is one which we choose for ourselves.
You make a good point about heterosexuality/homosexuality. It's amusing when homophobes try to claim that homosexuality is a "disease" or is "unnatural", "a mental disorder", etc. Homosexuality is the exact same concept as heterosexuality - it just contains different subjects. Calling it unnatural is like calling people with green eyes unnatural. Sure, we're a huge minority, but that doesn't make us any less natural than people with blue eyes/brown eyes/etc.
It's not about using lyrics to condone or justify what is wrong. Your lyrics cannot convince nature. Homosexuality is a homonal and mental illness. You should hear or read some testimonies, confessions or whatever of repented gays. You will realise they have the most dangerous disease the world has been faced with. You can write a holy book defending gay but i will never accept it. If not for human rights i have the responsibility to kill all gays who are not ready to give it up. Leviticus 20:13 ►
Parallel Verses
New International Version
"'If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.
God will not judge me for that.
I spoke to a gay on facebook. He seem to be mexican. It was clear he did not like being gay. His inner conviction makes him want to stop(has nothing to do with religion cos he doesn't even go to church.i quoted some common verses and he didn't know them). But he felt like a captive. And people like you get him confused when you call his disease a natural phenomena.
He is doing wrong and he knows it, he feels it within and you come around and encourage him that everything is cool and alright.
You are rather the enemy of gays.
I have respect for all gays who first of all accept its wrong and again would like to repent. I still respect them if they succeed or not. But for a gay who justifies his illment, YAK.
Who says? Your ancient tome? If homosexuality is an illness, so is heterosexuality. There's literally nothing from the scientific community which would lead us to think that homosexuality is a mental illness.
"You should hear or read some testimonies, confessions or whatever of repented gays."
All that would do is make me sad for the men and women who have been brainwashed into believing that they are ill and disgusting simply because they were born a different way. You know, not so long ago, many black people would say the same thing about their skin colour - that they wish they were white, or that they feel trapped, dirty, sinful, etc...
"If not for human rights i have the responsibility to kill all gays who are not ready to give it up."
Do you ever read what you're typing before you post it? Do you realise how insane you sound? You're essentially saying that if it weren't illegal, you would go around murdering gays. I don't think Jesus would approve of that very much, friend.
"I spoke to a gay on facebook. He seem to be mexican. It was clear he did not like being gay."
Unfortunately, this is a situation which happens. In many cases, the stigma around homosexuality leads people to be embarrassed and ashamed of who they are. Most often, it's because they haven't even attempted to try the lifestyle out for themselves. If this Mexican man goes out and finds a kind, loving man who cares for him and helps him realise his internal issues with his sexuality, he'll suddenly discover that he isn't a "captive".
"You are rather the enemy of gays."
Says the person who literally stated that if it weren't against the human rights act he would murder gays.
You're stuck in the past and stuck in your bigoted religious views. Times are changing, and we're becoming a more accepting society to the LGBT community.
I would've paid good money to have seen your face when gay marriage was legalised in all states of America, lol.
Homosexuality is a disease and unnatural i repeat.The aim of any of natural being is to be prolific to guarantee the survival and continuity of it's species of many generations to come. That is how it has been from the beginning. And that is how all have survived.
The system or rational genuine uniform process has been injected and corrupted with this virus. We have to cull it out of the system.
We cannot condone some stupid, irrational, unnatural selfish pleasures of people who do not care about the human race. They are selfish. They are grateful to their parents for being male and female to have mated into bringing them into this world. Instead of they showing appreciation and upholding the culture to be bring forth descendants who will make this world a better place to be. They selfishly want to enjoy the priviledge of life alone.Chasing after their selfish digusting pleasures and when they die they end their history.
They are the corruption of the human race despite or regardless of religious views which also support my(the majority) opinion. I regard not religion so you don't say i am blind folded by religion so my view is from a dark perspective. The blind fold is off and i still see the same thing.
The gay i spoke to had no stigmatization problems. I was usually blocked from commenting on some posts by his friends. I was the only one in that group who hated gay. But he still liked to interact with me concerning gay and he was never offended but his other friends always blocked me.
He wanted to know the truth but those he call friends(haters) were blocking it from him. Meanwhile they themselves aren't gays. They are gonna have children raise them up, have a happy family and even when they are dead their name will live on. He will be remembered and respected.
A gay dies and at most three years he is forgotten. All gay supporters are the worst enemies gays could ever have.
And coming to religion.
Jesus will be very glad if i kill a proud gay who is not willing to repent. It is not easy to set yourself free from gay i know. But i respect any gay who has the will, at least to quit. That is enough for me.
If gay was natural, how are people able to repent or get cured of gay. Its a disease and a threat to the human race.
By the way i am not from the USA. So i wont be involved in such a disgustful country when it happens.
Incase it does.
I might be the new adolf hitler.
I will ally with all of Asia and Russia and most of African Arabic countries(All the gay haters) to mass up explosives targeting USA, and throwing nuclear bombs or missles at you for a month(daily)or till your continent is completely shredded in order to save the human race from such an abomination.
But well its a pity(for the human race) it will remain in my imaginations.
How is homosexuality a dangerous disease ? I find it to be a very interesting choice of words. I've never heard someone say that homosexuality is dangerous ... You're making it sound contagious, like it is malaria. How is homosexuality dangerous to the person and to the people around ? I hope you don't mind elaborating. I am very curious.
" I've never heard someone say that homosexuality is dangerous ... "
You still have never heard it. I typed it, you read it.
"You're making it sound contagious, like it is malaria.
"
Malaria is not but homosexuality is. This disgusting immoral practice should not be encouraged. I would kill my own child if he was gay. I don't condone or justify disgustful immoral acts in the name of human rights.
"I hope you don't mind elaborating. I am very curious."
Instead of elaborating, i would
Cite an experiment hypothetically.
If 10000 gays were given a country of their own away from other parts of the world, supplied with all resources they will ever need, in 100 years time, how many gays will be left on the land?
If a gay buy shares, he expects it to be prolific but his selfish digusting pleasures doesn't seem to be irrational.
Every president should accept gay on the condition that, whenever there is war, they will go to fight cos they have nothing to lose. They have no children waiting for them at home.
My question still stands though... How is being around homosexuals increase the chances of becoming homosexual? Do you fear to catch homosexuality?
I will ask a question and I would like a real answer (spare me the insults). Are you a Nazi? If you are not, I am sorry for the offense. But if you are it would explain a lot and I know what questions to ask you in the future.
If 10000 gays were given a country of their own away from other parts of the world, supplied with all resources they will ever need, in 100 years time, how many gays will be left on the land?
I actually believe humans aren't that stupid. If there were only gays on the land and constant ressources, the population will grow until it reaches its carrying capacity. Probably, homosexual's biotic potential is maybe a bit lower but it is still there. They have the potential to reproduce. The choice to not reproduce when population levels are critical goes against human nature. Choice presents itself only when the possibilities aren't death and eventual extinction.
They will reproduce. They need young hands to be able to work the land and grow food anyways. They will reproduce in order to survive. Unless, homosexuality is indeed a mental disorder and therefore not a choice. In that case, their potential to survive is lowered because their sexuality will never change.
And final comment: Homosexuals do have kids and not always through adoption. Many want to have kids. They can have kids actually. They can reproduce. They still have functioning genitals. A couple of my friends have homosexual parents. If they really want kids what stops them? Sexuality only determines who you have sex with for the purposes of pleasure.
But then, if you believe it is not a choice, your hatred and disgust doesn't make sense... Do you hate people who have cancer? Would you kill your child if he had cancer?
"My question still stands though... How is being around homosexuals increase the chances of becoming homosexual? Do you fear to catch homosexuality"
I have been with people in school(boarding) for 3yrs.
When they came in the first year, they weren't gay. But before the end of the third year........ They gained accommodative butt holes.
Gays don't keep to themselves. I had a friend Eric who originally entered school(different from the boarding school) as a gay(i don't know where he was initiated). He didn't know i knew he was gay. Whenever i walked with him, he spanked my ass a lot.( I Suspected he wanted to trigger some disgustful pleasures in me).
I hated it so much but i never mentioned it cos i didn't want to be rude.Thank God he got himself into some trouble so he left(not sacked....his uncle took him out) the school and my ass in peace.
I conclude: gay is contagious.
Lol i am not a Nazi. But i am an admirer of adolf hitler and Muammar al-Qaddafi for a few character traits(firmness, etc) not accomplishment. And in a way i admire trump and putin'......character not accomplishments.....
By the way i can make statements void of insults....some people just provoke it with a headstart.
(And am straight foward...point blank..nothing like excuse me)
About the gays on one land. You clearly state they aren't stupid so they will reproduce..。meaning the non prolific act of gay is stupid. So then gay is not sensible(logically uncomprehendable)...Thank you.
Anyway perhaps i didn't frame the question well. I was only referring male gays. I don't consider the stupidity such women as gay.
So if only male gays, do men have wombs?No? Right.... So in hundred years time there will no man on that land.
And that makes them the most useless creatures on earth. A bit of religious quotation. Its applicable in every situation.......
Matthew 7:15
19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.
If you buy shares and it is not making good profit or no profit, you redraw your shares(eliminate it)....
It is applicable in all situations including gay...
But gay doesn't even given still born babies.....completely useless....an act just for the disgustful and distasteful fun of it. Its a waste of life.
Its like driving around town just for driving sake; wasting fuel.... The car must be parked...
"Unless, homosexuality is indeed a mental disorder and therefore not a choice."
It is therefore a mental disorder.
"Homosexuals do have kids and not always through adoption. "
So they know what is right...right? To have kids. Yet they are still involved in it. Then it means it is an illment like HIV AIDs, they don't have a solution(they are not searching) to so they live with it.
"Do you hate people who have cancer? Would you kill your child if he had cancer?"
You just affirmed my statement. You have qualified gay as sickness by categorizing it with Cancer.
No no dear, I believe it is a sort of choice. The same choice you make when you realize you prefer thin than fat. You don't really know why but you do.
What I was doing is reductio ad absurdum.It is a form of argument which attempts either to disprove a statement by showing it inevitably leads to a ridiculous, absurd, or impractical conclusion, or to prove one by showing that if it were not true, the result would be absurd or impossible. So usually you start with "Suppose that homosexuality is a mental disorder". It is a method i like using because my opponent doesn't feel attacked. My goal is to understand your reason and either make you clarify your point of view or make you realize on your own what it entails.
And when I say human aren't stupid, I mean that when humans need to reproduce they will. If they don't they won't.
(Side note: I believe that today the pressure to reproduce is very low. We are reaching our carrying capacity, our resources are very limited. I could actually say that looking at our situation, reproduction is selfish. I want to have kids because it feels like an living art project. It wouldn't be to have help on the farm. Selfish isn't it?
But that is another issue.)
So they know what is right...right? To have kids. Yet they are still involved in it. Then it means it is an illment like HIV AIDs, they don't have a solution(they are not searching) to so they live with it.
Yes, my end argument is that they know what to do. They reproduce. So, your argument about homosexuals doing wrong because they don't reproduce is invalid. What you find is wrong is their attraction.
Going back to your island. So if we were to put homosexual men on an island, of course they will all die. If you also put only heterosexual men on an island, they will all die. You put only homosexual women on an island they will all die. You put heterosexual women on an island they will all die. What is your point? Did I misunderstand the experiment because all your experiment proves is that, no matter the sexuality, to survive men need women and women need men. Your experiment would have made more sense if you put homosexual men and homosexual women on an island. Their survival will show whether their sexuality is choice or a disease.
So, okay your disgust is towards male homosexuality. What are your thoughts on female homosexuality?
And once again i am still perplexed. Your hate does not make sens. It would only make sens if you thought it was a choice. But you don't. Suppose it is a sickness. Why would you hate someone sick? It is not their fault they are sick.
I have been with people in school(boarding) for 3yrs.
When they came in the first year, they weren't gay. But before the end of the third year........ They gained accommodative butt holes.
Gays don't keep to themselves. I had a friend Eric who originally entered school(different from the boarding school) as a gay(i don't know where he was initiated). He didn't know i knew he was gay. Whenever i walked with him, he spanked my ass a lot.( I Suspected he wanted to trigger some disgustful pleasures in me).
I hated it so much but i never mentioned it cos i didn't want to be rude.Thank God he got himself into some trouble so he left(not sacked....his uncle took him out) the school and my ass in peace.
I conclude: gay is contagious.
Okay that isn't empirical proof that it is contagious but your experience does explain your hate. I hate it when men do that to me. Keep your hands to yourself ! It is a disgusting act. But it never led me to believe that all men are disgusting and disrespectful.
Your so called "friend" was disrespectful and I would hate him too. He had no right right to touch you that way. I hope you understand that it wouldn't have been rude to tell him to leave you alone.
"What I was doing is reductio ad absurdum.It is a form of argument which attempts…………"
You failed right?
"So, your argument about homosexuals doing wrong because they don't reproduce is invalid."
Wrong. It is the most logical reason to hate gay and not that only.... I brought the reproduction factor to prove how more absurd it is after the disgusful sexual intercourse.
Do you know a gay can reach an extent of faeces just falling out his butt without any pressure? I know gays who use diapers. So disgusting.
"What you find is wrong is their attraction"
Have you heard anything like opposites attracts? North and south in magnetisation?
That is nature. Even in the non living....magnets.
The first two types of every creature was male and female. That is default....designers fault ......... nature.
Anything that comes along the way protraying something different is corruption......and has come to disrupt the tranquillity of the process.
Nature is sensible. And designs everything in a way to fit its fucntion or the purpose it supposed to serve.
The penis was not made just to get hard. Immediately it gets.....it also prepares itself to release sperms....because it knows it function.......it is just logical to nature......
The presence of sperm indicates it is ready to enter a vagina, find a womb and then develop. It is not intended to enter a butt hole....and then come back out....(even picturing that is so disgusting)
Only someone with a mental and homonal disoder;A mistake in his homonal or psychological state, will make him engage in such an act.
I have proved even without reasoning, the body itself knows it.
The VAAAGINA is mean't for sex. I even hate it when i hear women are fucked in the butt.
You cannot breathe with your kidney.
Your lungs cannot pump blood.
Your heart cannot digest food...
Your nose does not produce milk
Your breast cannot be used for sight.
Gay is unacceptable. It is corruption.
Therefore anyone who is capable of the opposite...is faced with the biggest sickness in the history of mankind. And most dangerous since it capable of disrupting the naturally designed fucntion the human body; psychologically and homonally.
Gay is a threat...and i am not over exxagerating。。。。。。。。。。。。。。what i have said so far is even an understatement.
"So if we were to put homosexual men on an island, of course they will all die. If you also put only heterosexual men on an island, they will all die. You put only homosexual women on an island they will all die. You put heterosexual women on an island they will all die. What is your point? "
Damn. Is it that you don't understand or you do and yet you delibrately distort the understanding to win an argument.
My experiment simply means.......if the world is divided according to our sexual preferences. That is; all lesbians on one land alone with their lesbian partners, gays on the same land with their gay partners, all heterosexuals on the same land with their sexual partners.
So then we wait for a century.
And nature will prove its logical design......
I don't think i have to ask if you get the point now....i think you got it already but you distorted it to win an argument.
"What are your thoughts on female homosexuality?"
Lol. That. Its just stupidity.
Its a mediocrity of sex. They are just fooling themselves....someone should tell them stop. The bible does not even consider it. .......they better find another name for it....cos its not sex...lol
"Suppose it is a sickness. Why would you hate someone sick? It is not their fault they are sick"
I don't know what exactly happens to them after their first time of being penetrated in the butt.
So am not in the right position to determine if its a choice or not.
I have a whole different view of gay religiously also....and it contains why....i do not bring it on board so you don't call me superstitious....though i have proof....
Now i have always said i hate gays(sick people) but not the ones willing to repent(seeking solution).
The one ready to repent will try his best to abstain from it or if he would, he would do it with another known gay.
He won't spread it, he wouldn't like someone else to carry his burden. A nigerian gay wanted to cut off his penis. Nobody knew he was gay untill he admitted it and he was crying for help.
But a gay enjoying his sickness(that i hate)......is contagious......he will fuck every butt that comes his way....and i am ready to murder that gay.
"Your so called "friend" was disrespectful and I would hate him too. "
No no.....now you are disrespectful!!. You imply that he could have had sex with me but he should have been more respectful.....you have even insulted me more than he has......you have just declared me a female.....
So incase you and i meet for sex...who is going to fuck who...since we both are fuckable .
OmG. That is so disgustful...
Don't compare your femine body to mine...ever...
You have long hair,vagina,puffed breast, you menstrate, you have heigthened senses sexually and in terms of ability to smell...
You use makeup, soft body(me opposite),highly emotional, curves etc
And you say what? They do it you and so what?
Where do i fit in the list i just made there......?
Disorder-disrupt the systematic functioning or neat arrangement of.
Soooo by definition of this the systematics behind a human having sexual relations with another is order so a guy on guy or girl on girl disrupts the systematic function of reproductive organs yes? XD by definition it is mental disorder.
I think this debate begins with deciding what a "mental disorder" is. I think of it as faulty biological programming that conflicts with a humans basic needs and mental characteristics. Humans are biologically programmed, so to speak, with a sexual drive for the other gender to encourage childbirth and reproduction. Homosexuality provides a sexual drive opposite of what was intended, so yes, I consider it a mental disorder.
Please know that I don't think of homosexuality as a "mental illness", even though I defined it as such. Homosexuals are still people and deserve the respect we give everyone else. I believe that sexual relations should only exist within a marriage between a man and a woman by the proper authority, so this may conflict with other's beliefs, but I still respect and love them as human beings. I just think they have a greater challenge in life than some people.
Homosexuality is just another form of love and sex.
Hating homosexuals (or hating anything else) is just another form of anger and potentially violence from that anger, which in and of itself might be linked to mental disorder.
NO ONE is even remotely talking about hating Gays!
This is what the Left ALWAYS DOES! They always try to demonize anyone who does not blindly follow their politcal coreect indoctrination of our children's minds.
Hillarious. You are an ALL CAPS raving lunatic on this site dumping your hate on all sorts of stuff and you have the nerve to say hate has nothing to do with it, and then also to smear once again that everyone who disagrees with you is Left.
Wow, he sure rose to an occasion that he shouldn't have unless you were correct. I agree, I don't think the mental disorder should be assigned to homosexuality, but those who show extreme aggression towards gays or the LGBT may have an issue with it.
Sometimes I wonder whether he is an archaic chatbot that was too useless to be continued, and somehow found its way to the Internet.
But then again, I have ideas for any of you not really existing. Everything from my own delusions to some universal background user. So that's not really surprising.
I repeat, you total moron! This debate said nothing about hating gays, or being disrespectful to gays, but fools like you CONSTANTLY must push that narrative because you have nothing you can say to the truth of our words concerning homosexuality.
Everyone knows it is not normal, so you must attack those who say the obvious. You have no other way to push your agendas. You must make people believe that Gays are constantly under attack and being hated by the Right so you can push their agenda onto our nation's public schools and States.
Funny, because I'm clearly not the only one who thought you were hateful in this debate and in your response to me.
"Everyone knows it is not normal" huh? Except the homosexuals, and the heterosexuals who think folks like you should leave the homosexuals alone. That means not everyone.
"Mental illness refers to a wide range of mental health conditions — disorders that affect your mood, thinking and behavior"
Disorder-disrupt the systematic functioning or neat arrangement of.
So given the definition we can clearly see that homosexuality is a Mental Disorder. I come to this conclusion because in the definition is says disorder(definition above) which relates in this definition because being homosexual disrupts the systematic functioning of the reproductive system. additionally it is a disorder that effects your mood thinking and behavior for the same sex : )
Your definition of disorder would mean anything other than common average is a disorder.
Furthermore, it assumes homosexuality is an optional and acquired condition instead of something biologically programmed from birth. If their biology destined them to become gay then it isn't a mental disorder, it's instead what their genetics programmed them to become.
And finally it ignores any shades of gray or degree on a sliding scale or spectrum. So for example, is a gay in the closet more classifiable as being in a mental disorder than say an outwardly violent heterosexual rapist? By your definition the rapist has no mental disorder because systemically they are functioning. Indeed, the heterosexual population with it's widespread interest in porn, sexuality in the media, oppression and exploitation of women, etc, may have a large proportion of mental disorders than the small subset of gays who just want to love each other.
I wouldn't say that hating gay people could be linked to a mental disorder, just the same as I wouldn't call hating animals relatable to a mental disorder. It's more a case of your upbringing, I think.
Homosexuality is obviously a different form of love and sex, but the question here is "Is that love a disorder?". I couldn't say it is or isn't, and all I can say is it's not normal. If we classified everything unusual as a mental disorder, many more people would be in mental health clinics than there are at the moment.
You think accepting every makes you a cool guy. And you get three vote ups. Just like people have snakes as pets and they look cool only to find themselves in the snake's stomach in sometime to come. I saw you endorse porn on my debate.
I thought it was just an opinion but it actually the kinda guy you are. Your children are really gonna enjoy some good parenting. When they can do whatever they like cos dad is cool guy. I can't be sad enough for you. So i'd rather not start.
All you've done is wildly speculate. My kids are happy and disciplined, there is no porn in my house, and I don't care about popularity. When I speak out against bigotry it is because it's the right thing to do for our fellow humans.
Pedophilia becomes a mental disorder when it leads you to do despicable things. There are people who openly admit that they are pedophiles, and the reason they do so is because they want to explain that they don't choose whom they are attracted to, but they choose what they do about it.
Those people are not mentally ill, in fact I think they might be the most sanest people ever, because they have ''urges'' that they can never ever act on, and every day they choose not to.
A mental disorder is something that affects your life. We all have at least one symptom that characterizes Schizophrenia or ADHD, but we are not diagnosed until the symptoms affect our daily life, when it becomes a big obstacle for ourselves and people around us.
Homosexuality doesn't fit into that category, because homosexual partnership and homosexual intercourse is consensual - and when it isn't, then we are talking about rape and abuse, so that's a different discussion.
Homosexuality does not affect your daily life more than preferring apples over oranges does, and it certainly doesn't affect the people around you. Yeah, your mother might be embarrassed and sad that you turned out gay, but she doesn't need to take care of your for your entire life, she doesn't need to live by a strict routine every day in order to make your life easy, she doesn't need to be more sensitive in what she says to you more than other people. So yeah... homosexuality is not a mental disorder.
We all know that Homosexuality is consensual and nobody is denying their right to live as they choose.
What you always miss, and I believe deliberately so, is that we are not talking about their right to act on their urges. We are saying their urges are not normal, are not natural, and not something we as the human race should be sanctioning as normal to our impressionable chidren.
There should be no programming of our children's minds of how homosexuality is a normal natural thing. We should be teaching our children in schools to respect all people no matter how they look or talk, WITHOUT giving special mention to any political correct sexual orientation.
Do we teach kids that pedophilia is ok as long as people don't act on their desires? NO, we don't even bring up the subject to our impressionable kids.
That's how it should be for all controversial subjects in public schools. If parents want to teach their kids about these subjects, they can do so in their own homes.
Yes, of course, ignore the problem so that it gets bored and goes away by itself.
What happened to your 'SOCIETY SHOULD ALL BE NORMAL! YEAH!' stance? Strange to see that you're saying 'They can do whatever they want to their children.'
You're completely contradicting yourself when you make such a claim. Homosexuality MAY not be normal, but we should still allow such individuals the same rights everybody else deserves and enjoys.
How can homosexual communities live in equality if they don't protest, or lobby for laws?
Do you expect them to sit back and listen to degradations and endure hate crimes against them?
From my experience arguing with you, you can't even listen to a contrary argument without saying how demented, and politically correct it is. I would not complain if you had any sense, you hard skulled hypocrite.
WORST OF ALL, AFTER YOU LIST ALL OF THE CRAP YOU RANT ABOUT, YOU ALWAYS SAY "ETC" TWICE!!! THAT'S DEMENTED IN ITSELF!!
BTW from within is not allowed to respond to this. Anyone else is more than welcome.
As always, you attack those who state the obvious. Take biology class once more because you obviously failed it big time etc. etc.
As always PC sheep like yourself must always talk about hate crimes as if we support them. As I always say, ALL PEOPLE SHOULD BE TREATED WITH RESPECT AND NEVER BULLIED FOR THEIR DIFFERENCES.
THIS DOES NOT MEAN WE SANCTION THEIR DISORDERS, DYSFUNCTIONS, UNNATURAL DESIRES, ETC. ETC. AS BEING NATURAL AND NORMAL!!!!!!!!!
You as always are a waste of time to debate because you ALWAYS bring up things such as hate crimes to try and sanction unnatural sexual orientations. IGNORE
Why shouldn't controversial subjects be taught in schools? Because something is controversial doesn't mean it's not important to be taught. And I don't think homosexuality even counts as controversial anymore. It's just backward-minded conservatives who have any problem with homosexuality. Homosexuality is not a disorder. Because most humans aren't homosexual, doesn't mean homosexuality is wrong or a disorder. It doesn't affect your life negatively, it doesn't even affect your life much at all. Children should know about gays and lesbians, and know that it is completely alright to be one.
Homosexuality is unnatural and goes against how we are designed. You don't lift up these things as natural to our children.
Those so called backward minded Conservatives are the only people speaking the OBVIOUS TRUTH about unnatural abnormal sexual orientations.
People like you live in your politically correct bubble whereby you spew utter PC hogwash of how Homosexuality in no longer controversial. It's funny how issues you agree with are no longer controversial, but wen it comes to issues you are against, you think they are very controversial.
You are so arrogant to ignore the strong heart felt feelings of parents who want to protect their children from issues they disagree with.
How would you like gun target shooting classes in public schools?
How would you like classes on our nation's Christian heritage in public schools.
How about classes on trapping for fur?
How about classes on the benefits of capitalism?
The Left is made up of arrogant controlling Liberals who think they have the right to force their agendas on all our children. People like you are very very damaging to our nation and our freedoms to disagree.
Homosexuality is not something new! In modern society, people fight for their human rights, therefore, many of homosexual people come out! In some ways we could argue that since it happens at all, that it is natural. While I understand there is a natural fear of that which is different, it’s the 21st century, so instead of complaining about how others live, let’s focus on how we live and what we can change to make our lives better
Of course it's not. If homosexuality is a mental disorder, so is heterosexuality. They're the exact same concept just with different subjects.
There's really no argument here. If a heterosexual person calls homosexuality a mental disorder, they're calling their own sexuality a mental disorder too.
Marriage is about love, not gender. As long as you stay within your species, have at it. If two consenting adult humans are in love, they should get married. It's not a mental illness. Love is not a mental illness. Love is the best thing that can happen to you.
Disorder-disrupt the systematic functioning or neat arrangement of.
Soooo by definition of this the systematics behind a human having sexual relations with another is order so a guy on guy or girl on girl disrupts the systematic function of reproductive organs yes? XD by definition it is mental disorder.
This debate is about whether being gay is a disorder. Stay on topic. Being gay is not a disorder. The is nothing wrong with two consenting adult lovers getting married. Have you ever been in love?
The question has been asked of you "Do you think the Muslim Faith looks at being gay as a disorder" Muslims are citizens of The United States are they not ?
When did you start using that definition for marriage? I guess when you started feeling mad at your dad for marrying ya mum to bringing you in this world where you have been living the worst pathetic life you couldn't have ever imagined.
Accepting anything stupid that comes into the world cos you cannot think for yourself.
Why did you limit your statement to 2? What about when 5 people love each other very much? It is still illegal for them to wed. Though having many partners is legal and often celebrated, these partners cannot make it official, despite much of the rest of the world allowing for polygamous relationships.
To be definitive in 1973 it was voted that Homosexuality be removed from the DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual) by the APA (American Psychiatric Association)
so anyone who thinks it is, is over 40 years way behind in progressive thought
Nothing is really a mental disorder if you think about it. People just have different kinds of brains. That doesn't make them disordered. And clearly from this debate mental disorders are subjective.
Definitely true! Mental disorders are heavily stigmatised, but people don't realise that everyone's brain is unique. I don't see autistic people as mentally ill, for example, their brains just work differently.
Nothing is really a mental disorder if you think about it. People just have different kinds of brains. That doesn't make them disordered. And clearly from this debate mental disorders are subjective.
Nothing is really a mental disorder if you think about it. People just have different kinds of brains. That doesn't make them disordered. And clearly from this debate mental disorders are subjective.
Homosexuality is a PREFERENCE, not a disorder. It is up to them, if they are attracted to people of the same sex. There is absolutely no problem in being homosexual.
It's utterly moronic to say that people choose to be homosexual. Sexuality is out of our control. Did you choose to be heterosexual? No, you just realised one day when a bosomy woman bent over in the street to pick up her dropped purse and your mini-me got hard.
Saying you choose to be gay is like saying you choose to be naturally blonde. Sure, you can dye your hair, even bleach it, but underneath all that pretending you're still a blonde.
It's moronic for an idiot like you to think I'm going to read your garbage. Obviously you are another brainwashed puppet who thinks they can keep themselves out of Hell by being a jerk.
So a man bending over for a man is a disease and not a choice? The disease causes them to bend over, they don't choose to bend over?
You can't make a rational argument against reality so you throw your moronic face around like a fool.
Having sex with a man is a choice, yes... Just like it's a choice to have sex with a woman. But heterosexuality and homosexuality themselves aren't a choice.
People choose who to have sex with, but they do not choose who they're attracted to. I could be attracted to men, but thanks to bigots like you wish to suppress those feelings, so choose to have sex with women instead. I would still be gay, though - I'm just in denial and closeted.
You cannot make a rational argument against science and nature so you slander people who disagree with you, calling us "moronic" and "idiots".
Are you being pleasant? I don't even have to read your stuff to know you are being repulsive. If you don't want to believe God loves you and that He can and will save you from Hell if you will come to terms with Him ,His terms, that's your problem and not mine. If you don't like me saying sin is evil and sinners need to be saved from Hell by God the Savior, Jesus Christ, don't read my stuff. I'm not going to read yours.
You're probably just trying to make excuses for sin, loving it more than life while it takes you down in death to eternal dying in Hell. That's why fools like you attack those who know God is the Savior, Jesus Christ. You're guilty and trying to relieve your shame by attacking those who remind you of your sin.
I do love to sin, you're not wrong there! In fact, this Saturday I'm going out to get absolutely wankered. Binge drinking is a sin, right?
I don't attack Christians for being Christians - I "attack" Christians who expose their bigotry and have no tolerance for things which do not follow their ancient scripture.
Considering I don't believe in heaven or hell, I don't think it really makes sense for me to be "guilty" about my sins. Have a lovely day, though!
Can you prove it is not a disease? you just say your opinion that it is a choice not a disease. I believe it to be both a disease and a sin. Disease defines as "a particular quality, habit, or disposition regarded as adversely affecting a person or group of people." so by definition is is a disease
You need to refute my definition in order to prove it is not a disease and changing the topic name does not change my argument I am still arguing that it is a disease.
There's nothing to say if you think you do not have a choice in how you indulge sexually. It's just common sense that a person chooses to do what they do. Sorry if you feel that's a personal attack. What can I say if you are trying to imply you don't have a choice in sexual behavior? It's not me who is being illogical in this.......and by the way, it's you who is using at attack instead of an argument.
Homos want to try to force everybody to think they way they think, they want to silence anybody who says it is a choice....especially if they say it is wrong, which it it...homosexuality is just plain wrong and you have no common sense if you try to make excuses or reasons for it.
I have challenged him to a 1v1 debate lol his first argument was of no relevance its about who has to prove there own points you or the opponent. his opinion practically becomes this. I list my explanation and if I dont want to I do not have to list sources for why I have this and you have to go find it lol.
Well according to you it's not , you claimed it was delusional you idiotic beast which is far from natural , you truly are a dimwitted brute .
Here is what you claimed in a previous rant you dumb brute , you even forget previous rants where you posted your nonsensical theories on love ; let me refresh your goldfish memory for you ........
All in your own words you dimwitted brute .........
Whenever i see two people saying they are inlove, i think they are delusional. They describe each other in some angelic manner, Some things, they minus the whole world can see. They sound silly, not real, funny, annoying........sappy.
Ring any bells ?
How people like you get through yet another day is astounding ....
Lol......you don't get it do you? You need a good samarithan to explain to you. Certainly not me. I know how your brain works. I have had some hectic time with it some few weeks ago.
Yes I do get it you idiot , you claim a mothers love is natural after stating that love is delusional, which going on your logic is therefore natural .
You forget one thing a good liar needs a good memory , you are indeed a liar but a very dimwitted one who cannot even remember what he posted .
You really are a prize fuckwit as remember you are the one claiming love is delusional yet natural ; you're so stupid you may end up owning a goldfish pond and claiming it's successful thriving businesss ...... oh wait your dimwitted father already does that doesn't he :)
The reason why i never answered that your absurd question sometime ago is cos of your lack of conceptual speed. You cannot differentiate between natural and delusional, Love and a type of love which is being inlove(eros: the main concept in my debate).
You do your usual shallow thinking then you think you get and you start ranting.
Nice brain.
There are three types of fault.
Your fault(i doubt)
Default(possible)
Accidental fault(possible. Even probably heredity....then imagine the origins..lol)
Ha ,Ha , you actually title your ridiculous question a debate ;) you idiotic brute , I DID point out the difference between so called delusional love and natural love which you think are one and the same .
Very tellingly you also state in another rant about your parents throwing chairs and objects at each other in this state of 'natural ' love , you must be so proud of your parents :)
You talk about hereditary faults ... seriously this coming from a Ghanaian / Nigerian living on aid money in one of the worlds biggest shitholes is truly hilarious :)
You still don't have your customised oxford dictionaries do you?
What the heck is delusional love and natural love? Which type of love is not natural? All forms of love are natural:Eros: Love of the body. Eros was the Greek God of love and sexual desire. ...
Philia: Love of the mind. Also know as brotherly love, Philia represents the sincere and platonic love. ...
Ludus: Playful love. ...
Pragma: Longstanding love. ...
Agape: Love of the soul. ...
Philautia: Love of the self. ...
Storge: Love of the child.
I am just stating one which is eros is delusional. Delusional is not the opposite natural dimwit.
Because its delusional doesnt mean it cannot be natural; it wasn't manufactured in a science laboratory for Godsake.
Its like saying a Stupid irish man.
Irish is not the opposite Stupid.
So you are irish alright naturally but then you are also stupid as one of your qualities.
And i wasn't talking about my parents stupid irish.
My parents leave home in the morning for work and come back late. They are too tired to be throwing chairs instead of relaxing in them.
Ha ,Ha , you're the one living in Ghana where there is possibly one dictionary for the whole country and you's are waiting for a white man to explain to you's it's not a door stop :)
You've invented a new term which is a beauty .... delusional natural love .... that's fucking hilarious look forward to seeing your thesis on this ... I actually think you're insane , you really need someone to read what you write but you cannot ask your wife because she's undoubtably thicker than you which is pretty bad .
Your father is a common Nigerian thief aided no doubt by your mother , indeed you applaud the thieving as you admitted once it's white people getting robbed .
Too tired coming home :) from a days thieving and scrounging aid money......
What happened the ' fish pond ' he was 'CEO ' over :)
Is that what i actually typed? Or you just do some editing so you get something to say? You just changed the organisation of the content and therefore changing the context.
I actually think the poor devil is insane , he constantly claims delusional love is natural which is even for him taking his stupidly to a whole different level
No one understands your stupidity not even you I'm thinking .
So it's a ' metaphor ' now even then it's nonsensical also it's hilarious that you a prize idiot label others who fail to understand your nonsense as morons :)
I always knew your brain wasn't good for comprehension. Thats why i did not want to answer that sometime ago. I tested you with a chance and you proved me right.
Most of what he says makes little or no sense ; he also never admits his mistakes which are continuous but instead attempts another equally nonsensical defence
I said it from the beginning why i did not want to explain it before. I know your brain. My cat is smatter than you. Its not about calling me idiot or anything. Its doesn't i am. Maybe you are the idiot who doesn't understand.
I always wonder if your children will ever get wise counsel from you.
After stressing all the muscles of your brain what do you tell them?
No you cannot explain because you've been caught lying yet again a favourite tactic of yours when your nonsense is exposed .
You say ......it's not about calling me idiot or anything. Its doesn't i am.......
Again your words so you're admitting you're an idiot , I already knew this .
Your concern for my children is touching but not needed , on the other hand we give your chimps aid money as you cannot feed them yourselves because you're a lazy shower of chimps who when not thieving are scrounging aid money :)
Come on, chimp, what we're talking about here is something you haven't noticed.
. Its not possible in the normal sense.
I'd refute that if you could reasonably lead to your conclusions from it. For the reasons here, that's an unnecessary step. There is no difference even if we remove it. What we generally call irrelevant.
My last reply on this one too. I should have never replied in the beginning. Its not my explanation you are looking for, you want something else~really stupid....it has no end...
What stupid thing is delusional love. Where did you get that stupid idea?
Am only saying All chickens(love) are born natural but there is one which is yet blue in colour(delusional).
Just like you...
First of all you are naturally a man, irish..........but you are also stupid, a dimwit. Its like a house(natural) containing people(qualities: Delusional, stupid, moron etc.)
If you don't get it still then you don't deserve to have a brain. You are wasting it.
YOUR claim is love is delusional which is natural ; no matter how many ways you try to explain that it makes no sense as you do not even understand basic English .
So chickens are born natural except blue ones which makes that chicken according to you ...... delusional :) :) :) I'm pissing myself laughing at your idiocy ; is this the sort of education Ghanaians get ?
In fairness you're possibly the stupidest person on CD and have difficulty tying your own shoelaces but then again you're half Nigerian aren't you :)
As much as I hate to agree with him if indeed you said love is delusional and natural one of those ways you lied saying a type of love makes no difference you said love in general not one specific type of love. Would be like saying there is an army but no military.
You have a frozen brain, it a waste of time exchanging thoughts with you as it won't penetrate. But this one sharp edged and will be lancing through .......i expect a reply soon as result of its effect: feedback.
You've yet to make one argument on CD you dummy ; why not post a debate topic of interest to all up and give it a go instead of shooting your fool mouth off ?..... bet you won't
"As much as I hate to agree with him if indeed you said love is delusional and natural one of those ways you lied saying a type of love makes no difference you said love in general not one specific type of love. Would be like saying there is an army but no military."
If you cannot understand this then you don't really need to be here it makes perfect sense.
I understand it perfectly and will give you the right answer only if your assertion was right.
Simply means you have conjured some texts into it therefore making your question inaccurate considering what i actually said.
I won't answer for what i didn't say even if it's one word changing the meaning.
Now here is your mistake.
Your mistake is(because you still insist) calling me a liar, and that i was refering to love in general, and not one type of love.
I think your source is from the words of dermot when we argued.
That is how he presented it in his first post.
I have always told him he quotes my words wrongly or incompletely. So he is not a good feed.
That is why i wanted you to know where it actually began: a debate topic by me, titled "people 'inlove' are just delusional"
To say people are 'inlove' means a specific type of love. The type which leads to marriage or sexual attractions(Eros).
And dermot was asking me about jesus's love and etc.....forgetting it is another type of love. The love of God(Agape).
Probably contributed to your confusion.
I guess you no more have a question; then. Since your basis were wrong and a right one couldn't give the same question ,unless a newly generated one, which i don't see necessary and see it to be weird, why you have a tendancy to ask me a question no matter what.
You cannot help yourself with your lies , when I challenged your claims you went into a petulant rant , it's all there on your debate and you also didn't answer even one of the people who challenged you , the evidence is there you liar .
Here's your words you cowardly dog 👉 You claimed .... In a few years time they start throwing chairs, tables, chairs, laddles,forks, etc at each other
I did not run to andy I was asking him what can be done about you. This is a site were we debate. Calling people names saying they can go fuck themselves and saying they fuck dogs is not debate.