CreateDebate


Debate Info

37
21
Pray to the universe Ask Marx about gun grabs
Debate Score:58
Arguments:63
Total Votes:90
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Pray to the universe (26)
 
 Ask Marx about gun grabs (24)

Debate Creator

Nom1(18) pic



How does Hootie plan on disarming 33,000 gangs & gun grabbing 400 million guns

Pray to the universe

Side Score: 37
VS.

Ask Marx about gun grabs

Side Score: 21
-1 points

How does Hootie plan on disarming 33,000 gangs

Wtf?

If you break the law you go to jail. That's how I plan on disarming them. If you carry a gun when it is against the law then you are breaking the law. Police presently have little trouble arresting people who are breaking the law, so your theory that this will all suddenly change if we stop permitting kids to walk around with machine guns is about as retarded and disingenuous as everything else you every say. Civilised countries do not base their laws on how criminal gangs are prepared to behave. That's ridiculous. Oh no, I better not make that law because the Cryps aren't going to like it? Wtf? Shut up you blathering imbecile. Stop writing stupid comments and go learn how math works.

Side: Pray to the universe
outlaw60(12923) Disputed
1 point

So NOM has something to say about the Demorat run Chicago ? You are Fucking Stupid and uninformed well that is known !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Side: Ask Marx about gun grabs
outlaw60(12923) Disputed
1 point

Hay Dummy can explain to us your knowledge of the Castle Law ?????????

Side: Ask Marx about gun grabs
Amarel(3863) Clarified
0 points

You’re right that the gangs aren’t the problem for disarming the public. The problem is the 400 million other guns, most of which are legally owned. The cops will have trouble taking those away because it is contradiction to their oath, so they won’t do it.

stop permitting kids to walk around with machine guns

No one does that. What they carry, and what kills most people, are handguns. Kids aren’t allowed to walk around with those either. Cops arrest them. Judges set them free because, you know, we imprison and jail too many people.

Side: Pray to the universe
0 points

@Amarel

You’re right that the gangs aren’t the problem for disarming the public. The problem is the 400 million other guns, most of which are legally owned. The cops will have trouble taking those away because it is contradiction to their oath, so they won’t do it.

Exactly.

Side: Pray to the universe
Hootie(592) Disputed
-1 points

The problem is the 400 million other guns, most of which are legally owned.

Well no, that isn't a problem. Since once you ban them, they cease to be legally owned. You see how that works buddy?

The cops will have trouble taking those away because it is contradiction to their oath

Stopping people from doing illegal things is a contradiction to their oath? I like the fallacy, but nah.

No one does that.

Amarel, there are literally amusement parks in America dedicated to permitting teenagers to walk around firing machine guns. The way you turn reality upside down is as bizarre as it is irritating.

MACHINE GUN AMERICA: THE AMUSEMENT PARK WHERE TEENAGERS GO TO SHOOT A HUGE RANGE OF AUTOMATIC WEAPONS

https://www.independent.co.uk/travel/news-and-advice/machine-gun-america-the-amusement-park-where-teenagers-go-to-shoot-a-huge-range-of-automatic-weapons-10147482.html

What they carry, and what kills most people, are handguns.

So ban handguns. Problem solved. Pat yourself on the back and go have a beer.

Side: Ask Marx about gun grabs
TheDevil(38) Disputed
-1 points

Tell you what, Nom. I will fuck off and leave you alone if you can adequately answer one question. Pay attention, think carefully, don't dodge this one, come up with something rational, and I promise I will go away.

We live in a violent world. We do not require guns, or bombs, or even any other weapon to kill our fellow human beings, and some of us don't even need a reason. It falls entirely inside the spectrum of possibility that either of us will be victimized one day. You have the hope that that won't happen, as do I. But hope is not a plan. I have a plan. (Actually, I have twelve plans. Two on the wall, two next to my bed, one I keep on my hip, seven in a safe, but that's not particularly relevant, I just hope it pisses you off.)

When someone physically larger than you, or armed with a baseball bat, or armed with an illegal firearm breaks down your door, the police are ten minutes away or perhaps you can't even reach them, and you have the hope that they aren't there to rape or kill you or your family, what is your PLAN when hope fails?

Side: Ask Marx about gun grabs
TheDevil(38) Disputed
-3 points
justicebaker Disputed
3 points

OK. That was the funniest fucking thing I've read all morning.

Laughing at the rule of law is hardly something any rational person would do. Your amusement at the concept of law and order is obviously a sign that you are not a well man.

Now that I'm done laughing let's analyze the logistics of this, shall we?

The logistics of what?

I mean, ignoring the legal nightmare of repealing multiple constitutional amendments

Now THIS is MY interpretation of something which should provoke streams of laughter. The very fact that the constitution was amended in the first place debunks your assertion that it would be a "legal nightmare" to amend the constitution. You literally are trying to use an amendment to imply the constitution cannot be amended. I can think of nothing more ridiculous or stupid.

Your posts are not worth reading mate. They are gigantic walls of rubbish.

Side: Pray to the universe

He wouldn't. He would support what the Democrat Party supports which is putting activist Liberal Justices in court so they can force their anti Gun agenda on all law abiding citizens.

The criminals will of course still get guns as did the criminals getting alcohol during prohibition.

The Left knows this... THEY DON'T CARE!

Side: Ask Marx about gun grabs

He never has an answer on this one. He just avoids the point all together.

Side: Ask Marx about gun grabs
1 point

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

Supporting Evidence: i plead the second! (en.wikipedia.org)
Side: Ask Marx about gun grabs
0 points

His plan is to cry and bitch and moan and downvote and ban disagreeing commenters until he can convince the police and military to do it for him. Which they won't, because they'd be starting the Second American Civil War. And if that's the reason that the ACW2 gets started, most of them would be on the opposite side.

Side: Ask Marx about gun grabs
Hootie(592) Disputed
1 point

His plan is to cry and bitch and moan and downvote and ban disagreeing commenters until he can convince the police and military to do it for him.

I am fine with disagreement. What I am not a big fan of is fallacy.

It is not my fault or my problem that you do not understand the difference between the two. Write a reasonable argument and you'll get a reasonable reply. Write a giant wall of shit, and you will not.

Side: Pray to the universe
0 points

@TheDevil

I agree. In fact, they have no idea what they are truly asking for, as the overwhelming amount of people that are skilled in violence are on the side of having a strong right protect their own intact--using potentially lethal force, if necessary.

Side: Ask Marx about gun grabs
Hootie(592) Disputed
1 point

I agree. In fact, they have no idea what they are truly asking for, as the overwhelming amount of people that are skilled in violence are on the side of having a strong right protect their own intact--using potentially lethal force, if necessary.

Look @TheDevil.

Someone who struggles with his own native language agrees with you. Aren't you the lucky one?

Side: Pray to the universe