CreateDebate


Debate Info

0
11
Yay, joe!!! Wait..., what? No!!!
Debate Score:11
Arguments:11
Total Votes:11
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Wait..., what? No!!! (11)

Debate Creator

joecavalry(36296) pic



How to put an end to Gay Marriage and Abortion debates.

 

Gays refused to accept the words, "Civil Union," and fought for the word, "Marriage."

 

The government could have allowed religion to have a monopoly on the word, "Marriage," while they themselves used the words, "Civil Union" exclusively for every union (in order to differentiate between a religious marriage and a state sanctioned marriage).  But they didn't.

 

For the longest time, it was called "Gay Marriage."  So, now that the law of the land is that the word "Marriage" will be used exclusively by the government to refer to every state sanctioned union, it may be time for the religious die-hards to take matters into their own hands and stop using the word "Marriage."  Perhaps they can invent some new word or they can always fall back on the words "Religious Marriage." 

 

Better yet, they can call it a "Holly Union."

Oh, wait.... I got it.... call it a "Proliferating Union." Proliferating because only a man and a woman can "naturally" proliferate and the word, "Proliferate" has the words, "Pro," "Life" and "Rate." Then they can define a "Proliferating Union" as a union between a man and a woman for the purpose of proliferating. Which makes it a Pro-Life Union, meaning that people in a "Proliferating Union" cannot have abortions (everyone else can have all the abortions they want). They can then state that all other unions do not "Rate" (meaning, they are not "real" unions).

 

A rose by any other name is still a rose.


NOTE: This solution will end the "Gay Marriage" debates AND the Abortion debates once and for all!!! Yay me, for coming up with the final solution!!!

Man! Can I think outside the box, or what?

 

While everyone else is out partying on this 4th of July, I was diligently sitting here trying to solve the world's problems.

Yay, joe!!!

Side Score: 0
VS.

Wait..., what? No!!!

Side Score: 11
No arguments found. Add one!

Who am I kidding? You people are going to keep arguing about this for years to come. ;)

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

They say that imitation is the highest form of flattery. I just took it to the next level ;)

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

No because separate is inherently not equal, but if we did that and it caused problems in society, I think there would be more of a problem changing the law back. I've heard some extremists say if we tried such laws as outlawing gay marriage and going further into stoning gay people, if it didn't work they'd be ok changing the law back in the other direction. That's obviously bullshit because they would not keep that promise. I'm not just talking about religious people but a lot of abortionists have similar beliefs in other areas besides abortion. Abortion itself is not one.

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!