CreateDebate


Debate Info

7
6
True. Wait..., what? No!!!
Debate Score:13
Arguments:20
Total Votes:13
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 True. (5)
 
 Wait..., what? No!!! (5)

Debate Creator

jolie(9810) pic



How to save America and turn it around.

If 50% vote for Hillary or Trump, then neither one gets 50% of the votes.  If the remaining 50% vote for a third party candidate, we have a chance to advert disaster.

True.

Side Score: 7
VS.

Wait..., what? No!!!

Side Score: 6
2 points

Not voting is like saying, "What's so great about America that we should save it from corrupt politicians?"

Side: True.
1 point

I'll happily vote for a Third Party candidate if one matches my beliefs. The problem is I don't completely buy the Libertarian philosophies, nor do I think everything boils down to the Green Party point of view, nor am I flattered by the so-called "Independent Party" some tool registered last election because he's not the voice of me either and I hate that because he co-opted that moniker many independents now have to be called "un-enrolled" instead, which makes it sound like we don't even participate in a democracy.

Show me a great Third Party candidate. Please. I'm serious. Give me a name or two to look at if you've got them.

Side: True.
2 points

So, here are your choices. You can vote for a corrupt politician, Hillary. Or you can vote for an unqualified individual, Trump. Now, either one of those choices may not destroy America because congress should keep whoever ends up being president in check. Or, you can vote for a third party candidate who is less corrupt and more qualified and will also be kept in check by congress. This is a case where less is better ;)

Side: True.
Grenache(6053) Clarified
1 point

Ok. But give me some names you think I should take a look at.

Side: True.
FromWithin(8241) Clarified
1 point

Here is the simple facts of third parties. Which ever side(right or Left) they lean more to will take those votes and allow the other party to win. There has yet to be a third party candidate that could garner enough votes to win.

I would vote for a conservative third party but I have yet to see one. He would have to be pro life. There is NO ISSUE more important than innocent human life.

Democrats support killing unborn babies all the way up to birth. You tell me how a baby a few weeks from birth is any less human than after traveling down that birth canal.

Democrats have become EXTREMISTS!

Side: True.
FromWithin(8241) Disputed
1 point

What a shock, the same deceiver who told us he is not for either party but more a Libertarian, WILL VOTE FOR HILLARY AS I SAID HE WOULD DO!

You are as far left as they come to vote for this criminal.

WHO DO YOU THINK YOU ARE KIDDING?

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
1 point

Wait..., is this comment for me? When did I ever say I was a Libertarian?

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
Cuaroc(8829) Clarified
0 points

So is this what not responding to Grenache again looks like?

Side: True.
1 point

Well I don't understand your math at all--it didn't make any sense, read it again--but I agree that there is a 3rd Party Candidate out there who is much better than either Hillary or Trumpy.

And he is the guy I plan to vote for: Gary Johnson. Libertarian Party Candidate. You should check him out and where he stands on the major issues. I find him vastly more agreeable that Trump---who is at the end of the day little more than a clown--or Hillary, who is perhaps the biggest vote whore ever to run for POTUS. In that she will do or say absolutely, no-holds-barred ANYthing to get elected. Integrity be damned.

SS

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
2 points

The assumption is that a total of 50% of the country is deciding the president because 50% of the country is not voting. If the 50% of non voters vote 3rd party they can beat a candidate only getting 25% of the total vote.

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
1 point

Thanks for explaining. I thought I was clear but... ;)

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!