CreateDebate


Debate Info

16
6
For Against
Debate Score:22
Arguments:16
Total Votes:25
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 For (10)
 
 Against (4)

Debate Creator

Ryskeldi(14) pic



Human Cloning

Cloning of living things has already become non scientific fiction theory as proved Molly sheep. From view point of Ethic and religion cloning is immoral, however human cloning could give possibilites saving a lot of lives by solving problem with lack of donors organs.

For

Side Score: 16
VS.

Against

Side Score: 6
2 points

Who is Molly the sheep?

Side: For
Ryskeldi(14) Clarified
2 points

Second cloned sheep after Dolly by Ian Wilmut, Keith Campbell , Rolsin university,

Side: For
Cuaroc(8712) Clarified
1 point

Wow didn't know that.

Side: For
2 points

Um we could sent clones into battles and save Human lives and test if outer space is okay without wearing a big white suit

Side: For
1 point

Human cloning would be a positive message for mankind, and an excellent opportunity for the advancement of science. In the past century, scientists have been hard workers in making numerous achievements, discoveries, and inventions, giving us the knowledge we have acquired about ourselves and about the world around us. For years, scientists have studied and made tremendous progress in cloning. Experts say that if cloning research was legal we could find better treatments, and perhaps even cures for many terrible diseases that so many of us suffer and die from each year. For example, AIDS. This is a well-known illness that damages the human immune system. There are treatments available, but statistics show that three million people die from AIDS each year, and yet so far, no one has been able to find a cure. With cloning, scientists could copy and create more white blood cells to fight off and kill the deadly virus. This would save millions of innocent lives. It would also help in making new medical discoveries and expand our knowledge. With new advancements, we could continue to explore, research, and learn- just as we have been doing for several years.

Side: For
2 points

Omg that would be sooooo cool but what if they steal my identity lol

Side: For
2 points

There is nothing sacred with human body, it just a pile of bone and soft tissues. Cloning technology could improve our understanding about the human body itself, thus perhaps in the near future a new kind of human generation, free from defect could come true.

Side: For
1 point

Clones would be the best organ donors. Imagine one of your folks suddenly gets cancer in her kidneys and she needs to have a transplant. Of course would try to do anything for him, you decide to be his donor. Then after the operation, his body rejects the new, foreign organ, and the kidney fails. The doctor says that the only way he would survive would be to find a kidney with the same type of tissue as his original, healthy tissue. The solution to your folk's problem and the answer to your prayers would be cloning. Because a clone is an exact copy, he would have no worries about his body accepting the organ or not. This would be the only way to save him. But there is just one problem, cloning humans is not legal. What is going to happen to your folk?

Side: For
2 points

One more advantages of cloning is returning of lost(dead) familie's member. By storing DNA of each member of family further if some of them would die member of family would be able to recover those one by cloning. But, of course, it is another issue how much it is right from ethical viewpoint.

Side: For
1 point

Human cloning would be entirely beneficial for science, and the quality of life, in addition to helping the prosperity of the human race. It would save, create, and improve lives all over the world. This would be an amazing accomplishment for scientists and following this major milestone, who knows what we will discover next! Human cloning would help the human race, the world of science, and the age of technology. The government would be blind not to see the benefits and allow human cloning.

Side: For

I think diseases can be cured through cloning as well as finding the way to grow another limb for an amputee.

Side: For
2 points

I am aginst Human Cloning unless we have a control population. Some people we clone some we don't. Then we study affects of the cloaning on people, see if it would mess up our immune system or prevent us from mateing naturaly.

Unless there is some sort of control then i am aginst.

Side: Against
2 points

NO, because these clones would scare the fuck outta me .

Side: Against

Using cloned humans for the sake of harvesting their organs is extremely sick and twisted.

Also, what part of over population don't you understand, there's already enough people in the world.

Side: Against
0 points

Yeah, there's enough people in our country. Women bear a lot of children. We don't have enough place to shelter them because we, ourselves have a problem with shelter. Besides, why would you even want to have an identical human being like you?

Side: Against
Ryskeldi(14) Disputed
2 points

But what if we would able to clone high qulified scientist as Einstein, Tesla, Zigmund Freid, identical clones of these people could continue their researches and brought to humanity great advantages.

Side: For