CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.
Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.
You can share this debate in three different ways:
#1
#2
#3
Paste this URL into an email or IM:
Click here to send this debate via your default email application.
Click here to login and CreateDebate will send an email for you.
I don't think Trump is crooked.. I think he's stupid..
Hello:
Forgetting EVERYTHING else, keeping
his business under his family control was a mistake that he could NEVER
recover from.. It ISN'T a matter of whether he's cheating or not..
It's that we wouldn't KNOW if he's cheating or not.. That cannot stand.
Jewel if you Leftist could just get everyone to sign onto your twisted mindset maybe the world would be a better place for us all ! What ya think ??????????
Similar to the Christian who thinks joining the party of witches and atheists is God's will. That's a lot of mental hoops to jump through to justify that mentality.
One of our all-time great fact checks was The Fact Checker’s March 21, 2008, report on Hillary Clinton’s false claim that she arrived in Bosnia “under sniper fire.” The article, written by our former colleague Michael Dobbs, was quickly followed by CBS News, PolitiFact and others — and ultimately became a defining moment in the 2008 campaign for the former first lady.
“I remember landing under sniper fire. There was supposed to be some kind of a greeting ceremony at the airport, but instead we just ran with our heads down to get into the vehicles to get to our base.”
–Hillary Clinton, speech at George Washington University, March 17, 2008
Hillary Clinton has been regaling supporters on the campaign trail with hair-raising tales of a trip she made to Bosnia in March 1996. In her retelling, she was sent to places that her husband, President Bill Clinton, could not go because they were “too dangerous.” When her account was challenged by one of her traveling companions, the comedian Sinbad, she upped the ante and injected even more drama into the story. In a speech earlier this week, she talked about “landing under sniper fire” and running for safety with “our heads down.”
There are numerous problems with Clinton’s version of events.
The Facts
As a reporter who visited Bosnia soon after the December 1995 Dayton Peace agreement, I can attest that the physical risks were minimal during this period, particularly at a heavily fortified U.S. Air Force base, such as Tuzla. Contrary to the claims of Hillary Clinton and former Army secretary Togo West, Bosnia was not “too dangerous” a place for President Clinton to visit in early 1996. In fact, the first Clinton to visit the Tuzla Air Force base was not Hillary, but Bill, on Jan. 13, 1996.
Had Hillary Clinton’s plane come “under sniper fire” in March 1996, we would certainly have heard about it long before now. Numerous reporters, including The Washington Post’s John Pomfret, covered her trip. A review of nearly 100 news accounts of her visit shows that not a single newspaper or television station reported any security threat to the first lady. “As a former AP wire service hack, I can safely say that it would have been in my lead had anything like that happened,” said Pomfret.
According to Pomfret, the Tuzla airport was “one of the safest places in Bosnia” in March 1996, and “firmly under the control” of the 1st Armored Division.
Far from running to an airport building with their heads down, Clinton and her party were greeted on the tarmac by smiling U.S. and Bosnian officials. An 8-year-old Muslim girl, Emina Bicakcic, read a poem in English. An Associated Press photograph of the greeting ceremony, above, shows a smiling Clinton bending down to receive a kiss.
You Wacked Out Leftist want to talk about Lies !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LMMFAO !!!!!!!!!
I thought Obama was stupid. He could stutter and have long awkward pauses with the best of them.
Reagan said, "trust, but VERIFY".. He was right.
And the left called him a Nazi.
It ISN'T a matter of whether he's cheating or not.. It's that we wouldn't KNOW if he's cheating or not.. That cannot stand.
No idea what this means. There are lots of things we don't know about Democrats. They stand. Would you like everyone to disclose everything? If they did, we'd have an open season field day with corrupt leftists.
I thought Obama was stupid. He could stutter and have long awkward pauses with the best of them.
Usually, we don't base ones intelligence on whether or not they stutter or have long pauses in their speeches. I think, and correct me if I'm wrong here, but ones intelligence is usually based on what they say. For example, what you just said there would not be considered intelligent.
So, you're not intelligent and you're a liar. Obama never said any such thing. Here's what he said...
“… it is just wonderful to be back in Oregon, and over the last 15 months we’ve traveled to every corner of the United States. I’ve now been in fifty …. seven states? I think one left to go. One left to go. Alaska and Hawaii, I was not allowed to go to even though I really wanted to visit but my staff would not justify it.”
Most likely he had a brain fart and meant to say 47 states. Why is this even a thread? If this is the worst thing Obama said, then the right sure has no brains.
Would it be a fair comparison of Obama's administration fumbling on some security steps when they handled Bhengazi to that of Trump paying hush money to a prostitute? Those kind of scandals?
Who would you prefer as a President with those two examples in mind?
Obscuring mistakes? Is that what you think they did? If so, how does that stack up against the scandals of intentionally committing acts not befitting a President, like paying hush money to a prostitute. Hardly, right?
Sexual conduct not befitting the Presidency became befitting decades ago. Trump’s sleaziness isn’t new to the Presidency, just new to a Republican Presidency.
LOL. Shut your lying mouth. Trump has been accused of sexual assault and/or misconduct TWENTY THREE times, on top of FOUR rapes, including allegations from his ex-wife and a (at the time) twelve year old girl.
“women: Juanita Broaddrick accused Clinton of raping her in 1978; Leslie Millwee[1] accused Clinton of sexually assaulting her in 1980; Paula Jones accused Clinton of exposing himself to her in 1991 as well as sexually harassing her; and Kathleen Willey accused Clinton of groping her without her consent in 1993.”
Amarel, your intellectual dishonesty is so predictable it is cringeworthy. I told you to READ the Wikipedia page. I did not tell you to cherry pick the parts you like out and ignore the rest.
when Broaddrick testified about her alleged encounter with Clinton under oath, she denied having been raped by him. In her NBC interview alleging rape, Broaddrick stated that she had only denied being raped under oath to protect her privacy. Supporters of Clinton have also noted that she continued to support him, and appear at public events on his behalf, weeks after the alleged rape, and that Broaddrick stated that she couldn't remember the day or month the alleged incident occurred.[12]
Several witnesses disputed Jones' account, including her sister and brother-in-law. These witnesses contended that she had described her encounter with Clinton as "happy" and "gentle". In addition, Jones had claimed to friends that Clinton had a particular deformity on his penis, a claim that was revealed to be false by investigators.[2]
Linda Tripp, the Clinton Administration staffer who secretly taped her phone conversations with Monica Lewinsky in order to expose the latter's affair with the president, testified under oath that Willey's sexual contact with President Clinton in 1993 was consensual, that Willey had been flirting with the president, and that Willey was happy and excited following her 1993 encounter with Clinton.[3] Six other friends of Willey confirmed Tripp's account in sworn testimony, stating that Willey had sought a sexual relationship with the president.[4]
“Broaddrick stated that she had only denied being raped under oath to protect her privacy.”
Why are you continuing to cherry pick data after I have already busted you for it? You are just astonishingly dishonest to the point that conversation with you is essentially pointless, since all you are looking to do is misrepresent the facts.
Oh that reminds me. Angry ex wife who accused Trump of rape recanted her claim.
Your efforts to portray Trump as the victim are simply fucking laughable. Ridiculously loaded language and purposeful omission of data is not a form of argument. It is a form of deception. Read:-
The Trumps' divorce was granted in December 1990[15] on grounds that Donald's treatment of Ivana, including his affair with Marla Maples, was "cruel and inhuman".[3][16][17]
One day kiddo, you’ll learn how to identify logical fallacies, rather than just saying random fallacies and hoping one is right. So far you’re almost never right, like now. But keep on practicing.
One day kiddo, you’ll learn how to identify logical fallacies
Whereas you will continue to tell everybody that up is down and left is right until somebody is finally smart enough to put you in the ground where you belong. Your idea of debate is literally to start with a bias, and then selectively pick and choose your facts to reflect that bias. It doesn't matter what snivelling jibes you throw at me, you have just proved that to everybody who ever reads my response to your post. Live with it.
I’m never concerned by the bullshit you post because it is always so contradictory to what you are addressing in posts directly above. It would be as though I claimed in this post that your post just proved in your own words that you enjoy eating feces. I can say that, but anyone can look at your post as see I am way off. That’s how most of your bullshit is. It typically gets less subtle as the length increases.
I’m never concerned by the bullshit you post because it is always so contradictory
Lmao. This from the guy who literally just claimed he "always thanked me" for correcting his spelling. How is it even possible for you to contradict yourself in the same fucking sentence that you accuse me of contradicting myself? All you are doing is flapping your gums, like you always do when you are exposed as a morally corrupt idiot.
And, it sure looks like the Republican Presidency is going to take sexual scandals to new heights. A blowjob under the desk will look tame after Trump finishes.
I would be surprised if Trump misused the White House in that way knowing that anyone would record and leak anything for their 15 minutes of fame from all the main news outlets but one. Democrats don’t have to worry about them. Their Linda Trips are demonized.
I would be surprised if Trump misused the White House in that way
Eventually, when all the dust settles, when Trump has been tossed from the Presidency, we'll see the long list of misuse and abuse of the WH by Trump. Stay tuned.
I will. I know there’s bullshit to come, but let’s not pretend we know the details of said bullshit ahead of time. I would be surprised if his misuse is sexual in nature, for the reasons stated. I will not be surprised if it is economic in nature.
It ISN'T a matter of whether he's cheating or not.. It's that we wouldn't KNOW if he's cheating or not..
Then prove he's doing something illegal. I say you are cheating, and if I don't get to rift through your house, life and drawers, whether anything is there or not, it is just unfair. I demand to sift through your life for eternity just because, even though I have found nothing in over 2 years of searching with a comb.
I have found nothing in over 2 years of searching with a comb.
It's just like any other hearing, you line up, question and convict all the soldiers, caporegimes and associates before going after the Don. Stay tuned.
You've said stay tuned for over 2 years. He looks more innocent today than in the beginning of the investigation
Hello CB:
He IS innocent - until he's proven guilty in court..
I didn't say stay tuned till you decide you've stayed tuned long enough.. No.. I said stay tuned until the investigation is OVER.. It's like a jury doesn't make a decision BEFORE the trial is over..
He IS innocent - until he's proven guilty in court..
Then he is innocent.
I didn't say stay tuned till you decide you've stayed tuned long enough.. No.. I said stay tuned until the investigation is OVER.. It's like a jury doesn't make a decision BEFORE the trial is over..
Fine. We'll investigate the next Democrat for 4 to 8 years just in case. We don't want to take any chances. Investigate people and look for unknown crimes, like the Soviets and the KGB. You'd probably better not run Hillary, Pelosi, Waters or Booker in that kind of a system.
SUPER STUPID what is the crime you IDIOTS are looking for because if there were crimes committed those crimes would have already been leaked !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Trump isn't being investigated because he's a Republican.. He's being investigated because there are serious concerns that he committed a CRIME.
My hypocrisy alarm is going off. I don't tell you that your ancestry test is bogus because I hate Jews. I tell you that your ancestry test is bogus because your ancestry test is bogus.
