#1 |
#2 |
#3 |
Paste this URL into an email or IM: |
Click here to send this debate via your default email application.
|
Click here to login and CreateDebate will send an email for you.
|
I'm so upset right now. :'(
Add New Argument |
1
point
1
point
1
point
But if we don't have war, then how will we sleep safely and soundly at night? We must kill the terrorist before they kill us. Besides...war is good for maintaining the natural order. If we stop having wars for too long, then the unvierses megamolagimic spectrum will diversify and everything as you know it will be torn asunder. 1
point
Correct. You are absolutely right. The only ways not having war would help would be if every country unanimously agreed to do it, and even then it would be risky. Some random country could just say that they want war and send troops on the attack, breaking the promise. There's probably no way not to ensure not having it. 1
point
1
point
You have no right to tell me what OI believe. That is MY choice, not yours. Dont tell me what to do. I am not property. I support the use of war to protect life and liberty, and I am not sorry for that. You dont know me and you dont know what I believe so save it. I guess America was SO wrong for standing up to Hitler? And as much as I hate religion, all war is NOT through religion. You are just trolling to make yourself look good. Present facts or step. I do have a right, especially on a debating website. Nor do I troll. Also every war was based on the intent of obtaining an "asset," and an "religious," notion. You also contradicted yourself by pointing out hitler which wasn't even a war. Where is the liberty and having people you never knew existed die. Liberty isn't tangible, war is just a front for the stabilization of a countries populous. To answer your question, no it wasn't wrong nor was it right stopping hitler. It was the humane way, yes. You should also leave emotion out of an argument, you lose sight of the point. 1
point
I'm not dictating them, I'm questioning them. When did I give an order? Do you not understand a debate? You also just changed what makes you support a war. First it was , "assets" and "liberty." Now you say life preservation. How can genocide conserve life..so your solution to an issue is destroy the cause? 1
point
"Liberty." You mean that there was bloodshed of countless lives to sign a document? There is no liberty for the dead, yet you agree with it in order to feel self-freedom? You can put what ever reason behind the act, but the act remains the same. That's like saying you support murder for the right reasons. 1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
|