If a majority of the citizens of Idaho want to have their state declared a Christian haven then that is morally and democratically correct. For too long Christians have ''turned the other cheek'' only to find that other more aggressive and radical religions have exploited the peaceful and passive nature of the Christian faith. A line has to be drawn in the sand and it looks like the authorities in Idaho have the moral fibre and political courage to make a stand against the religion which has spawned so many murdering low lives.

Such a comment evokes the old adage, if the hat fits wear it. In this case ''murdering low lives''.

You make assumptions dear boy. Like bombs for instance- assumptions are very dangerous things to make- one mistake and you're in deep manure. If others tell you only a snippet of information you shouldn't make assumptions, and if they don't tell you anything try not to make assumptions anyway to fulfill your need to know and replace the necessity to communicate. Even if people such as you read something that you don't understand you will make assumptions about what it should have meant and then believe the assumptions. People make all sorts of assumptions because they don't have the courage to ask. Don't let assumptions cloud your perception of things or the truth won't get in.

I presented my opinion on the basis that each U.S, state has a degree of self governing latitude and therefore has the freedom of power to make such legislative decisions independently without contravening the American constitution or any part thereof. Clearly the State administers and legislators have made a similar interpretation of the margins within which they can autonomously pass State laws. There now, I hope that makes you a happy little little chappy.

I think it's fine. This title doesn't force anyone to adhere to anything. It just changes the title of the state itself.

Do try to keep up old boy, and follow the plot. Where in any of my posts did I make any reference whatsoever to Islam? The presumptive respondent in question ''assumed'' that my description of a barbaric murderous religion was Islam. Now, why ever would he have made such an ''assumption''? Don't ''assume'' that that was a rhetorical question, the answer to which we are all fully aware. Now, you can go back to sleep. Sleep tight and don't let the bed bugs bite.

My strong recommendation to all the good people of Idaho is, follow the path of righteousness and declare your State a Christian Harbour from where the message of our true faith and the word of the only real God can fill the air, and shine forever into the dark corners of false religions and paganism.

My considered opinion on this pivotal issue of monumental national importance is, as far as I know, I don't know. Man, man oh man, who ever would have thought that so many patriotic and eminent politicians would have made such an unconstitutional proposal. But, I guess it just goes to let's ye show's ye, doesn't it? Hallelujah brother, hallelujah.

When I hear the actual wording of whatever you are talking about, I will then form an opinion. The wording you use is probably pure rhetoric.