CreateDebate


Debate Info

3
6
Pregnant women are honorable We MUST have a uterus police
Debate Score:9
Arguments:12
Total Votes:9
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Pregnant women are honorable (3)
 
 We MUST have a uterus police (6)

Debate Creator

excon(18260) pic



If SCOTUS makes abortion ILLEGAL, will it be ENFORCED, or will it be on the honor system?

Hello:

Seems to me that WITHOUT enforcement, women are GONNA get 'em WHEN they wanna.  No??

excon

Pregnant women are honorable

Side Score: 3
VS.

We MUST have a uterus police

Side Score: 6
1 point

If scotus repeals Roe v Wade, abortion will not automatically become illegal. If any state makes it illegal, enforcement will be their concern. The most effective method would probably be to target Dr licensing, not women.

Side: Pregnant women are honorable
excon(18260) Clarified
1 point

Hello again, A:

Got it.

In any case, it doesn't really answer the question.. It would be MY view that abortion would go underground. If that happens, it's gonna take some sort of police force to root it out. And, in order to prevent OTHERS from taking it up, there MUST be some form of PUNISHMENT..

I'm just wondering how you see it working ON THE GROUND, in say, Texas..

excon

Side: Pregnant women are honorable
1 point

Too much CNN Con. No one is talking about abolishing the right to have an abortion other than leftist fear mongers.

https://youtu.be/nZKb4zWNZKc

Side: Pregnant women are honorable
Amarel(5669) Clarified
1 point

It could result in illegal abortions in some states. But then, with the high cost of illegal activity due to risk, it may just lead people to travel to the nearest state where it’s legal. It could even spark lefty charities to fund someone’s cross country Uber.

If it leads to illegal abortions, we won’t need some new kind of cops. The cops we have enforce whatever criminal code is on the books. They would enforce this too, according to whatever the particulars of the state’s law are.

Side: Pregnant women are honorable
outlaw60(15368) Disputed
1 point

Does the media you consume perpetuate your constant fear of the BUREAUCRATS you adore ???????????????????

Side: We MUST have a uterus police
outlaw60(15368) Disputed
1 point

If you don't have a cop IN the bedroom OR the Dr's office, HOW you gonna enforce illegal abortion?

Simple there Socialist BUREAUCRATS should be payed same as COPS as the COPS control the fear you have of underground abortion that will take place IN bedrooms.

Need COPS in the bedrooms of all Americans. So what is your opposition to what you so fear ???????????????

Side: We MUST have a uterus police
John_C_1812(277) Disputed
1 point

It looks like people are saying all woman who seek medical treatment to end pregnancy are in fact having an abortions. This is simply not true it is not a basic principle of state which can be used as explanation of United State for all woman who have a loss of pregnancy. It should be understood that the medical profession already held a point in which life began. One not limited to just pregnancy.

It is not SCOTUS that makes abortion illegal it is the admission and self-incrimination which describe the Female specific amputation as illegal. By the way it is this same admission which changes the woman’s United States Constitutional rights as we know it. This is by the intellectual way a woman is saying it is she who is officially ending the life that is continuing to develop as independent.

Roe vs Wade had a constitutional limit as it does not address the legal argument of an admission of guilt that is made by a woman’s choice of words. Again a grievance is that many woman do not have any constitutional right considered with pregnancy abortion. While the burden of this loss of right is not explained to be lost by the admission to a crime with simply no additional Miranda right.

Side: We MUST have a uterus police
Amarel(5669) Disputed
1 point

It looks like people are saying all woman who seek medical treatment to end pregnancy are in fact having an abortions.

What else is an abortion but a termination of pregnancy?

This is simply not true it is not a basic principle of state which can be used as explanation of United State for all woman who have a loss of pregnancy.

We aren’t talking about loss of pregnancy. We are talking about the willful termination of pregnancy.

It should be understood that the medical profession already held a point in which life began. One not limited to just pregnancy.

You can make this claim understood with a quote and a source. Until then, it is understood that this claim is not the case.

It is not SCOTUS that makes abortion illegal it is the admission and self-incrimination which describe the Female specific amputation as illegal.

That’s half incorrect. It’s true that SCOTUS wouldn’t make abortion illegal. It’s false that self-incriminating admission describing specific amputation as illegal makes it illegal. That would be absurd. Specific laws would make abortion illegal. Otherwise, admission thereof would not be incriminating.

By the way it is this same admission which changes the woman’s United States Constitutional rights as we know it.

Admissions do not change your Constitutional Rights.

This is by the intellectual way a woman is saying it is she who is officially ending the life that is continuing to develop as independent.

The way someone talks about a thing is not what makes a thing illegal.

Again a grievance is that many woman do not have any constitutional right considered with pregnancy abortion.

Listing rights is a sure way to limit rights.

Not all Rights are enumerated, nor should they be. The moral argument on the matter is not even sufficiently settled to articulate into law the rights of a mother concerning pregnancy and abortion.

While the burden of this loss of right is not explained to be lost by the admission to a crime with simply no additional Miranda right

First, Rights are not simply lost through legal omission, they are protection by legal inclusion. Though they may not have been there in the first place.

Second, the Miranda case did not convey any additional rights into anyone. A person already had the right to remain silent because anything they said already could be used against them. Their admission isn’t what made their crime a crime, the law is.

Side: Pregnant women are honorable
1 point

If you don't have a cop IN the bedroom OR the Dr's office, HOW you gonna enforce illegal abortion?

You answered your own question. Are you that incredibility stupid or is the PTSD you suffered on the boat in Vietnam ?????????????? ROTFFLMMFAO

Side: We MUST have a uterus police
1 point

Libs should just pretend the Mom's are babies, and say screw their rights.

Side: We MUST have a uterus police