CreateDebate


Debate Info

1
5
Yes. No.
Debate Score:6
Arguments:6
Total Votes:6
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes. (1)
 
 No. (5)

Debate Creator

Impirum(266) pic



If no proof is found, should the suspect be convicted?

Yes.

Side Score: 1
VS.

No.

Side Score: 5

Only if they are Donald Trump or any conservative not in the Progressive cult. The mule does as it's told or else. And don't you dare jump that groupthink fence and try to get away.

Side: Yes.
1 point

What're you going to do if conservatives don't join your progressive cult? Convict us? I'd like to see you try. I've got to be going now, you mentioned the groupthink fence and I need to jump it.

Side: No.
1 point

I'd say there has to be some evidence before you convict someone. They could be innocent.

Side: No.

Due process, there has to be proof..........................................................................................................................

Side: No.

In the US if there’s no evidence, you dont get put in prison. We are the home of the free

Side: No.

If the suspect is to be convicted, a person is in the position of weakness, i.e faces the punishment for a crime which that person may/may not have convicted. But by letting the person walk away, nobody gets punished. Though we might not have punished the criminal, we've stayed away from punishing a possibly innocent person. To risk a possibly innocent person doesn't seem rational just cause we want to punish the right offender.

Side: No.