CreateDebate


Debate Info

39
28
It IS The bongos just can't cut it
Debate Score:67
Arguments:58
Total Votes:82
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 It IS (19)
 
 The bongos just can't cut it (19)

Debate Creator

excon(4405) pic



If you don't HATE black people, but BELIEVE in your heart that they're INFERIOR,

is it still RACISM???

Hello Antrim and poochy boy:

I can ASSURE you, you WON'T be banned from this debate..  I wanna HEAR how you justify your hate -- or your knowledge.  If you don't hate, like I think you assert, but only cite FACT, where did you learn your facts??

Look..  IF we can't talk about it HERE, where CAN we talk about it??  Or, would you rather call me a filthy name?? 


excon

It IS

Side Score: 39
VS.

The bongos just can't cut it

Side Score: 28

I see all races as equal, so I don't think voter ID's are racist "because minorities don't know how to get one". I see all races as equal, so I don't think blacks need affirmative action to "keep up". I see all races as equal, so I don't think minorities need for the "White man to step in". I see all races as equal, so I'm an equal opportunity offender. If I think it's true, I'll tell you what I believe the truth to be even if it's "racially sensitive". Anything less is the bigotry of low expectations. Loving black people as though they are farm animals rather than loving them as human beings, isn't love at all. It's property control.

Side: It IS
5 points

"If you don't HATE black people, but BELIEVE in your heart that they're INFERIOR"

SUPER STUPID did i ever say i hated black people or shown them to be inferior ?

Pay real close attention because you are real DUMB !

As a matter of fact, it was Democrat President Lyndon Baines Johnson who stated, “I’ll have those niggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years” as he confided with two like-minded governors on Air Force One regarding his underlying intentions for the “Great Society” programs.

Former President Bill Clinton tried to get former senator Ted Kennedy to endorse Hillary Clinton for president in the 2008 election by describing Barack Obama this way: "A few years ago, this guy would have been carrying our bags."

Democrats hate black people you DUMMY and use them as political pawns !!!!!

Side: It IS
4 points

If you don't HATE unborn babies, but BELIEVE in your heart that they're INFERIOR,

is it still inhuman???

Hello excon and all Pro choicers:

I wanna HEAR how you justify your hate -- or your knowledge. If you don't hate, like your support of abortion clearly shows, but only cite FACT, where did you learn your facts?? Planned Parenthood? The Democrat Party? Feminists? Fake news?

[https://lozierinstitute.org/a-scientific-view-of-when-life-begins/]

Look.. IF we can't talk about it HERE, where CAN we talk about it?? Or, would you rather call me a fundamentalist Right winger hatemonger??

You make it just too easy to show your unbelievable hypocrisy when spewing so called compassion for other groups.

Side: It IS
3 points

According to geneticists we're all just a 'paler shade of black'.

''The HUMAN GENOME PROJECT has determined unequivocally that there is the same amount of genetic variation among individuals in different racial groups''. Apparently, ''what that means is that there is no real genetic difference between blacks or whites and Asians or between any of the so called races''.

There are many so called academics, or in the case of this site pseudo academics, who try to argue that this just isn't so.

In the same way that Galileo was criticized by the Roman Catholic Church on the publication of his discoveries about the workings of the universe, so there are those who are trying to pooh pooh the conclusive findings of this scientific report which explodes the myth of racial differences.

In this context it would be foolishly 'self-detrimental' to try to assert that any group of people with which one identifies himself/herself is superior to all, or any other group.

Being willfully, and perhaps mischievously racially antagonistic as an entertaining and amusing pastime to annoy the sanctimonious, self important phonies on this site is a different thing altogether.

The fact that they didn't/couldn't provide the results of the aforementioned scientific study is self explanatory.

Side: It IS
Amarel(2388) Clarified
2 points

Being willfully, and perhaps mischievously racially antagonistic as an entertaining and amusing pastime to annoy the sanctimonious, self important phonies on this site is a different thing altogether.

Basically, you enjoy trolling. Some of us already knew.

Side: It IS
Antrim(999) Clarified
0 points

Maybe you didn't swallow the whole elaborate charade and then again maybe you did.

I was able to pull off the pantomime because I know that there will always be those who would feel smug in making a show of being morally superior to others.

Then there is the ;-''oh poor us'' brigade who are obsessed with an irrational feeling that they are the object of collective hostility and prejudice on the part of others, a sort of self induced persecution complex.

All I had to do was act as a catalyst to former category and hey presto, they took the bait hook line and sinker.

A most satisfying outcome and well worth the effort.

Side: It IS
2 points

rac·ist

noun

a person who shows or feels discrimination or prejudice against people of other races, or who believes that a particular race is superior to another.

adjective

showing or feeling discrimination or prejudice against people of other races, or believing that a particular race is superior to another.

Hope that answers your question.

Side: It IS
marcusmoon(248) Clarified
1 point

That sure sounds like the Democrats and the assumptions underlying Democrat policies to me.

Side: It IS
excon(4405) Disputed
-4 points
jeffreyone(1137) Disputed
1 point

Whereas the facts of the evidence was compliled by one of what race?

Do you know i also have scientific, historical etc evidence to prove whites are inferior to blacks? We can start from the English we speak, to origin of man, schooling, Technology, Melanin, Physical strength and correlate it natural selection survival of the fittest and on and on and on and on..........

Racism really got into my head when i came to Createdebate especially when i met the dispicable irish.

Followed by excon, Antrim etc.......

Side: The bongos just can't cut it
Mack(312) Clarified
1 point

IF you had such facts and data (that proved whites superior to blacks) then that would be both the truth and racism. I don't see how racism (not the part about discrimination, but the part about believing one's race to be superior) in that scenario would be wrong, if it were only in correspondence with the truth. That wouldn't justify treating them unfairly though.

Side: It IS
0 points

IT IS......STUPID! About as stupid as one could be. Many of our best doctors, scientists, teachers, military officers, etc., are black. How can anyone even THINK inferiority is connected to color!?? Many of those have had to overcome the exact point you are making, ....NOT EASY most of the time!

Side: It IS
5 points

How times do you need to be punked SUPER STUPID ?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/message-to-senate-dems-vote-no-on-ben-carson us58b486c1e4b0780bac2c55dd

Message To Senate Dems: Vote ‘No’ On Ben Carson

At the end of last month, the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee voted to approve the nomination of Dr. Ben Carson for the position of U.S. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. Among the Senators who cast a “yes” vote to recommend the nomination for consideration by the full Senate were Democrats Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Senator Sherrod Brown of Ohio.

As far as I’m concerned, their votes were inexcusable. How any self-described progressive could put their seal of approval on such a dangerous, right-wing nominee is a betrayal of progressive values. At least Brown could argue that he needed to vote “yes” for political reasons ― he’s up for re-election next year in a state that went heavily for Trump last November.

Warren, however, tried to make the argument in response to the fierce criticism about her vote that you sometimes have to “pick and choose your battles”― that you can’t just oppose every single nominee because they were nominated by Donald Trump.

I agree that opposition just for the sake of opposition is a bad idea. Her argument, however, might be more effective if she were talking about a less controversial nominee. Ben Carson is among the most extreme, risky, reckless nominees that Donald Trump has put forward since he won the election- and that’s saying something.

First of all, Ben Carson has no experience in the areas of housing or urban development, except that he grew up in Detroit, one of the “inner cities” that Trump talked about as “a complete disaster” during his campaign. Not only that, but when there was speculation earlier on that Carson might instead be nominated to run the Health and Human Services Department, his spokesman came out and said that Dr. Carson felt “his background didn’t prepare him to run a federal agency”.

No, I’m not kidding; that’s the actual quote. Ironic, considering that Carson ran to be President of the United States, but now apparently feels he’s unqualified to serve in a lower-level cabinet position?

I guess Dr. Carson is under the impression that the Department of HUD is somehow less complicated or difficult to run than HHS, but he is sorely mistaken. HUD, in fact, is one of the most complex departments to run in the entire federal government ― its offices are spread out across the country and it has an annual budget of over 30 billion dollars. Some of the most vital programs that millions of Americans rely on are administered by the Housing and Urban Development Department, many of which Carson vowed he would try to cut and/or eliminate if he became President.

At a time when the shortage of affordable housing stock in this country is more severe than ever (and I know, having served on the Board of Directors of the West Hollywood Community Housing Corporation for the last two years), and millions upon millions of Americans are spending more than half of their income on rent each month, we need to be expanding these programs, not cutting or eliminating them. Ben Carson is the very opposite of the kind of person we need to be running HUD; he is an existential threat to the department and we as progressives and as Democrats must do everything in our power to prevent him from taking office.

I understand Senator Warren’s position that we need to pick and choose our battles carefully. But Carson is definitely one on which we should fight, and very hard. I strongly urge all Democratic Senators (including my Senator, Kamala Harris!) to please vote against him when his nomination is voted on by the full Senate. The vote on this nomination should be considered a litmus test when it comes to the progressive bona fides of each Democratic Senator- it doesn’t get any more important or fundamental to our values and principles than this decision.

Tell me SUPER STUPID that Democrats / Leftist / Progressives don't believe in their heart that black people are inferior ! Proven from a Radical Progressive at the Huff and Puff post now deal with that !

Side: The bongos just can't cut it
2 points

A very well researched and professionally presented post.

The problem is that the accuracy of it's content will not be accepted the loony lefties.

Side: The bongos just can't cut it
2 points

The Loony Left will never accept any content that destroys their narrative.

Side: The bongos just can't cut it
Quantumhead(850) Disputed
1 point

The problem is that the accuracy of it's content will not be accepted the loony lefties.

Us "loony lefties" seem to be aware of many things you are not. For example, "inferior" is a word (like "best" or "worst") which measures a specific quality. Hence, if you don't make clear what that quality is, then the use of the word cannot, by definition, be "accurate". It can only be a form of slander.

Nazis in particular like this form of generic, race-based slander and they detest "accuracy" when contemplating facts, so is there something you want to get off your chest, Antrim? I personally believe you should just admit that you are a Nazi. You'll feel much better inside.

Side: It IS
marcusmoon(248) Clarified
1 point

If I understand your post, you are saying that Democrats (at least Warren, many others in office, and the party leaders) are racists as evidenced by their statements and many of their policies.

That is how it seems to me.

Democrats often support categorizing people by race and extending special treatment to one race or another (which is the definition of racism) and lately it is Blacks and Hispanics. (Affirmative Action is one such policy.) Ostensibly this is supposed to ensure equality of outcome for all people. However, it belies the Democrat belief that if we ensure equality of opportunity and enforce a pure meritocracy, then Blacks and Latinos would not be successful.

This is a clear demonstration that Democrats believe Blacks and Latinos are inferior to Whites and Asians, and not good enough to achieve success by relying only on personal abilities and hard work. This is odd, considering the success of people like Alan West, Ben Carson, Neil Degrasse Tyson, Justice Soto-Mayor, Ted Cruz, etc., in addition to all the capable and successful people of my personal acquaintance.

So, yeah. Racism is intrinsic to the Democratic Party's outlook.

Side: It IS

The research shows they are behind in IQ. But I don't hate them. The white race is the prettiest race - even blacks know

Side: The bongos just can't cut it