CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.
Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.
I really don't mind it "being there", what I mind is when people USE IT as an establishment of religion. It IS ... constantly. At THAT time, it becomes un-Constitutional.
Ra was called "god" in Stargate. He was an alien. Some people claim Satan is "god". And others say money is "god". Spinoza said nature was "god". So care to share with us how using the word "god" is an establishment of religion?
Einstein stated that he believed in the pantheistic God of Baruch Spinoza.[2] He did not believe in a personal God who concerns himself with fates and actions of human beings, a view which he described as naïve.[3] He clarified however that, "I am not an atheist",[4] preferring to call himself an agnostic,[5] or a "religious nonbeliever."[3] Einstein also stated he did not believe in life after death, adding "one life is enough for me."
Which are all names of... Hmmm.... Gee, let me think. Oh, yes! Got it. Gods...
So tell us which religion it establishes.
Your opening statement has nothing to do with establishing any particular religion. It is a general statement that believing in God does not establish religion. Given that God is the very definition of (monotheistic) religion, then yes, belief in God establishes (monotheistic) religion.
Does this explanation compute with your outdated, language abusing software?
So no rebuttal. You've already accused me of puppets and mass up voting. I provided you my waterfall, and you quickly scampered off. You are mistaken once again. Anything else?
You've already accused me of puppets and mass up voting
Don't forget conversing with your own puppets. You do that too.
I provided you my waterfall
So wait, you're saying you "provided your waterfall" to prove you don't have any other puppet accounts, which would by definition have different waterfalls?
Whoa, you really shut me down there, didn't you dopey?
Anything else?
You are the one writing, moron. How would I know if there is "anything else"? Omfg.
Yes, but all of them are still religions, dopey. Hence, believing in God is an establishment of religion
It doesn't say "gods". It says "god". And god can mean money, idols, yourself...
So which religion does the word "god" establish? You can't even say it because to do so you'd have to infer that America and the West was founded on Christianity. Thus, you have to run in circles to hold to your other narrative that the West was founded on secularism.
Don't forget conversing with your own puppets. You do that too.
This is the only account I have. You accused me of mass up votes. I proved you wrong by linking my waterfall. You then had no response. The case is the same now.
But the very site owner himself has proven you to be an absolutely grandiose liar. Your dishonesty on this site has been extremely well-documented by a multitude of different contributors, myself included. If you claim that this is the only account you have, then that is as good as a GUARANTEE that you are using puppet accounts.
So wait, you're saying you "provided your waterfall" to prove you don't have any other puppet accounts, which would by definition have different waterfalls?
Whoa, you really shut me down there, didn't you dopey
You claimed I mass up vote myself with puppets. My waterfall proves I have no mass up votes.
When you say "dopey" is when you know you are beat. When you don't feel defeated, you use more vulgar names against your opponents. You've admitted that you are defeated. Very good. Excellent...
Your waterfall has no mass upvotes because I systematically downvote everything you artificially upvote. It's precisely why you hate me so much in the first place.
1)I don't up vote myself. If I had such a strategy, I'd create many puppets and up vote to huge quantities to keep you running for your life to down vote me.
2)You just openly admitted to intentionally down voting me. Meaning, you down vote regardless of the strength or weakness of the argument. More proof that you are a dishonest, grandiose liar. Correct nom?
3)I don't hate you. You are a part of my morbid amusement for the day. It's like watching mellow dramatic women gossip like school girls because they don't know any better. Other days, you are like a plane crash.
