1) " but there are things which I consider more important than feelings"

What kind of things, do you mean?

2) I think, real fear to lose your ethnicity, is the beginning of fascism. In my opinion, in the world stays only real strong ethnic nationalities, but not nationalities that tries to save them by closing or making barrier from another world.

[e.g. of strong ethnic nationality, happens in Russia in nowadays where russian girl are married with Tajik, Uzbek, Kyrgyz, Korean etc., because of weakness of Russian gays in whole. They have big problem with alcohol, drugs, absolute unwillingness to work.]

Its simple Russian gils just do not want to connect their lifes with endangered species.

1) " but there are things which I consider more important than feelings"

What kind of things, do you mean?

2) I think, real fear to lose your ethnicity, is the beginning of fascism. In my opinion, in the world stays only real strong ethnic nationalities, but not nationalities that tries to save them by closing or making barrier from another world.

[e.g. of strong ethnic nationality, happens in Russia in nowadays where russian girl are married with Tajik, Uzbek, Kyrgyz, Korean etc., because of weakness of Russian gays in whole. They have big problem with alcohol, drugs, absolute unwillingness to work.]

Its simple Russian gils just do not want to connect their lifes with endangered species.

Human race is not ready to unite.

It won't be ready as long as there are idiots who think that people shouldn't be able to consummate their love with a marriage for this and that reason... if two people love each other, denying them marriage is wrong. Period. Culture is not more important then love. Nothing is.

Tell this to Native Americans.

Something tells me you don't know anything about what modern Native Americans really believe. Do you really think that they automatically believe that love isn't important? You realize that makes you presumptuous cad.

Love, prosperity and unity are very subjective things.

Not really... you talk as if people don't generally agree on what's right and wrong. We have humanitarian laws passed by the United Nations you know... as in, the entire world agrees on what's right and wrong.

What for one is love, for another can be perversion.

And the people whom find normal love a perversion are very few in number, and the people whom actually have perverse love are even fewer in number.

Prosperity for one can be degradation for another.

Prosperity - A successful, flourishing, or thriving condition; good fortune.

Degrade - To lower in dignity or estimation; bring into contempt.

These words are nothing alike. You're full of shit. Anyone who thinks a peaceful, prosperous society as being degrading is a lunatic.

Unity for one - slavery for another.

These are two complete different words. Unity is voluntary, and slavery is involuntary. You really don't have any idea what you're talking about, do you?

Western countries (cultures) frequently try to impose their values.

Blah, blah, blah, the West does this and that, blah blah.

Did I ever say the West should impose itself on people, asshole? No. I said that people should be allowed to marry each other for love no matter what their background, race, religion, color, creed, culture, or whatever is.

Denying anyone of love is what's truly perverted, degrading, and enslaving.

Human race is not ready to unite. Not in that way and not in next centuries.

To be ready for something equates to the capacity to do that something. And even if we do not have the capacity to unite globally just yet, we are barely a heartbeat away. We can send vast amounts of information around the globe almost instantaneously. There is virtually nowhere on the world that can't be reached within 24 hours. All of the necessities of life and just about any creature comfort you can imagine could be transported anywhere, excluding political and economic factors. No AlikhanK, we are pretty much ready, its just that many people aren't willing. Why? Misplaced pride, fear, inability to change, perceived loss of identity. All of which are irrational and detrimental to our survival as a species.

Tell this to native americans - indians.

If another culture hadn't placed themselves above the Indians and callously took everything they had, the Natives wouldn't be in the horrible situation that they are in. This enforced sense of division you advocate is what nearly killed them off, and has wiped out many other cultures completely.

Prosperity for one can be degradation for another.

True, which is why we should strive for prosperity for all, if possible.

Western countries (cultures) frequently try to impose their values.

HUMANS frequently try to impose their values. Do you know anything about what the Hans have done in China? Not to mention countless examples in Africa. Once again, blurring the boundaries, removing the differences and acting in the best interests of the entire human race would make this much less of a concern. Conversely, maintaining the walls between us all will never allow the problem to be solved.

That's fucking stupid.

If anything marrying another ethnicity would strengthen genes because there is less likelihood of repeated genes, offering a wider selection of variables in the evolution of the embryo.

Sounds like a bunch of bullshit on so many levels.

What do you or these quack professor care who other people marry? Wtf does it have to do with you or that silly charlatan?