CreateDebate


Debate Info

31
14
No No
Debate Score:45
Arguments:27
Total Votes:60
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 No (16)

Debate Creator

FactLord(149) pic



Is Dermot a sentient being?

Dermot is not self-aware. He thinks reality is entirely subjective, if he was sentient he would realize that even if everything he experiences is subjective his state of consciousness/sentience/self-awareness is objectively real and therefore there must be an objective reality underlying his subjective experience otherwise nothing could objectively exist. He can't be sentient because he literally doesn't understand the concept that he exists, he is not self-aware.

No

Side Score: 31
VS.

No

Side Score: 14
3 points

In Buddhism, sentient beings are beings with consciousness, sentience, or in some contexts life itself. Sentient beings are composed of the five aggregates, or skandhas: matter, sensation, perception, mental formations and consciousness.

Can the said author of the post argue this ?????

Come on FartLord step up

Side: No
Dermot(5736) Disputed
2 points

Outlaw he will flee like he always does , he’s a Marxist scumbag

Side: No
outlaw60(15368) Clarified
2 points

Matter, sensation, perception, mental formations and consciousness shows the author of the post has none lol

Side: No
1 point

I'm delighted my correction of your pretentious bullshit has enraged you so much that you're driven to post yet another debate regarding me ; your attempt to get the mob to back you up is typical of your cowardly posturing ..... Good luck with getting someone to argue your position for you

Side: No
Antrim(1287) Clarified
3 points

Excluding his mob of aliases I'm certain the only other mob good old Fartbreath could muster would be lynch mob.

Side: No
Dermot(5736) Disputed
2 points

Yes indeed , he flies into a pschotic rage when his rantings are challenged , he’s typical Marxist scum furious at anyone who doesn’t agree with his babble and egotistical ravings

Side: No

You have to be sentient to be an artist.....................................................................

Side: No
2 points

He’s just lashing out as he’s a very unhappy person , he’s also a Marxist which is probably why he’s so unhappy

Side: No
0 points

I'm delighted my correction of your pretentious bullshit has enraged you so much that you're driven to post yet another debate regarding me ; your attempt to get the mob to back you up is typical of your cowardly posturing

Are you even for real? You struggle with the basics of your own language you stupid, delusional cunt. Being rude isn't the same thing as being smart. Smart people know this.

Side: No
outlaw60(15368) Disputed
1 point

What you struggle with is your total lack of intelligence and your claim of being smart people proves you are not.

Side: No
Dermot(5736) Disputed
1 point

Are you even for real?

Apparently

You struggle with the basics of your own language you stupid, delusional cunt.

This from a Marxist illiterate is hilarious

Being rude isn't the same thing as being smart.

You have proved that to be true

Smart people know this

Which rules you out

Side: No

You could easily search for a century and never find anybody as stupid as Dermot ever again.

Side: No
outlaw60(15368) Disputed
3 points

How would you know anything about any individual on the internet ? Are you that intelligent ROTFFLMMFAO

Side: No
Dermot(5736) Disputed
2 points

You could easily search for a century and never find anybody as stupid as Dermot ever again.

But you’re the one in a fury posting up debates regarding me all because I thrashed you yet again

Side: No
0 points

But you’re the one in a fury

No Dermot, clearly you are the one in a fury, otherwise you wouldn't have taken this obvious troll bait, you stupid, black-is-white twat.

Side: No