CreateDebate


Debate Info

22
14
Yes No
Debate Score:36
Arguments:36
Total Votes:38
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes (22)
 
 No (11)

Debate Creator

Micmacmoc(2260) pic



Is 'LOL' Overused?

Yes

Side Score: 22
VS.

No

Side Score: 14
1 point

I think LOL is great in many conTEXTs (and that has a double meaning... LOL) but I can never, ever think of it as something that could replace a genuine laughter in a conversation, which too many unfortunately think it can.

Side: Yes
1 point

Yes it is being overused and it is being used a lot. In fact isn't proper language to use. I don't use it at all whenever someone texts me something I don't use lol. I usually say hahahaha.

Side: Yes
Delta(1348) Disputed
1 point

..................Lolololololololololololololololol beat that! ¶_¶

Side: No
1 point

..................Lolololololololololololololololol beat that! ¶_¶

What do you mean? You are overusing it

Side: Yes
1 point

I've seen people overuse it. Annoys me a great deal. If you use it, use it sparingly and only when it is justified.

Side: Yes

LOL is soooo over used that I now use a smiley face because that is never over used. Not even by me ;)

Side: Yes

yea. it is. not annoying, but just overused. alot. lol. sorry just had to say it. i love sayin lol.lolololololololololololol.

Side: Yes

When someone starts a conversation, and says something funny, they ALWAYS say LOL.

Side: Yes
jonathangoh(1726) Clarified
1 point

MAny people here are also overusing the LOL word. I can't find it in the dictionary

Side: Yes
1 point

lol is overused way to much it is not laughter it is 3 boring letters

Side: Yes
1 point

'LOL' is overused.

People use it when they feel like it and in the most randomist of times.

Although the term means 'laugh out loud' people often use it,when nothing is actually funny.

Example;

"I'm bored!"

"LOL!"

Side: Yes
bass01(10) Disputed
1 point

and the word FUCK dont you feel that word is used way to much by people.

Side: No

It is, but it's needed though. We say LOL if we have nothing to say, or if we actually do find something funny. It's not as stupid as YOLO so it's all good (y)

Side: Yes
1 point

lolololOLOLOLPOLKOLPOLOLOLOLKOLLOLOLLOLP[OREKOGNOWENOEW[BIEFBOWebnjw;bjbgbgkjbgkjwebgkjwebew;GBEKW;gbkjewgEWJbbk;eG NO

Side: Yes
1 point

In my view, people overuse this abbreviation. Everytime and everywhere. Nowadays the real meaning of LOL is lost, because people can use it in unfunny situation, just to make the sentences shorter. I think that it is not good, and the reason is that people are making language lost.

Side: Yes

It is becoming a poor substitute for an expression that should have more words to it.

Side: Yes
1 point

Definitely! Every time I send my friends an email or text them, they almost ALWAYS respond with LOL. I've barely used LOL; usually LMAO because it's more "professional" than LOL. I have a friend that, no joke, replied LOL to my long messages 7 TIMES!

It's overused, it gets annoying and repetitive, and it's just a dumb abbreviation.

Side: Yes
3 points

NEVER!!!! LOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOL!

(sorry, I couldn't resist, well I could have, but chose not to)

Side: No
Crumble59(174) Disputed
1 point

It is overused. Putting 'LOL' that many times at all is wearing it out ever so more.

Side: Yes
1 point

No....................................................................... :) haha

Side: No
jonathangoh(1726) Clarified
1 point

I think your ........................................ are overused

Side: Yes

01101100 01101111 01101100 01101111 01101100 01101111 01101100 01101111 01101100 01101111 01101100 01101111 01101100 01101111 01101100 01101111 01101100 01101111 01101100 01101111 01101100 01101111 01101100 01101111 01101100 01101111 01101100 01101111 01101100 01101111 01101100 01101111 01101100

Side: No
1 point

Where is the word LOL?????????????????????????????????????????

Side: Yes
1 point

theres only 10 types of people in this world: those who understand binary, and those who dont

Side: No