One violates more human rights that the other.
Nope. Being tortured, one human right violated. Being killed, one human right violated.
Them get arrested and kill someone in jail and sit there and silitary confinement and report back when your humanity has been thrown in a major curve. Try having your kid sit in that confinement with nobody to talk to and gaining mental problems along the way, in which case you cannot prevent.
You want me to feel bad for the parents of criminals, but not feel bad about parents of victims? Psycho.
Tell that to yourself for calling them that. That doesn't help them at all. Follow your own advice and advocate for something greater.
I do follow my own advice, that's why I am not in jail.
We know that removal from society and solitary confinement violates human rights and deprives the subject of their humanity and sense of original self.
We know that you can't defend your position to use regular prison now, thank you.
Why are you calling me a jerk? Like follow your own advice, don't hurt other people. I also provided an alternative in which you provided a dumb answer since you are now assuming that anybody against solitary confinement is alike in all forms.
Jerks get called jerks, sorry. Prison is cruel and unusual. I don't ever want to be in prison. Prison scares the shit out of me. Let's get rid of prison.
Who is "you people"? I would rather someone just work, or be restrained for prolonged periods of time in contact with other people since the basis of humans is to be social. If the subject wishes to choose death then the subject may be granted his/her request.
You people are the crybabies that like to complain without giving a solution. Finally, an alternative method, but that seems terrible too. I wouldn't mind trying the restraints stuff, but prisoners are such dicks to each other it might totally backfire. It is unethical to grant someone there request to die according to you crybabies.
Justice? Really? Violating another human right is justice? Two malevolent acts makes justice? That's very logical. Again, I have provided you an alternative. There may even be more.
Let's just release the rapist, we don't want to do anything mean to him.
Eventually people in solitary confinement will wish for death. I'm not the creator of this punishment so I don't see a need for me to continue addressing this....point.
Keep addressing it? You have addressed it once. In ten years when we find out that restraining people and putting them in a crowd turns out to be cruel will you blame others when it is you who came up with it?