CreateDebate


Debate Info

32
25
2nd amendment ignored so yes My name is Excon
Debate Score:57
Arguments:50
Total Votes:69
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 2nd amendment ignored so yes (27)
 
 My name is Excon (22)

Debate Creator

Bronto(2002) pic



Is attemting to disarm an unwilling population tyranny?

2nd amendment ignored so yes

Side Score: 32
VS.

My name is Excon

Side Score: 25
2 points

The second amendment is not 100% clear on what the preconditions for allowing gun ownership are. But disarming the whole population would definitely render the second amendment null and void, and thus be a crime against the people and the Constitution.

Side: 2nd amendment ignored so yes
excon(18260) Disputed
1 point

But disarming the whole population would definitely render the second amendment null and void,

Hello Big:

You got the order wrong.. The PEOPLE would render the 2nd Amendment null and void, and THEN start rounding up the guns..

excon

Side: My name is Excon
BigOats(1449) Disputed
2 points

You got the order wrong.. The PEOPLE would render the 2nd Amendment null and void

The title of this debate mentions disarming an unwilling population. Why would an unwilling population render the 2nd Amendment null and void?

Side: 2nd amendment ignored so yes
Bronto(2002) Disputed
1 point

You got the order wrong.. The PEOPLE would render the 2nd Amendment null and void, and THEN start rounding up the guns

80% of America supports the 2nd, so how you going to do it without tyranny?

Side: 2nd amendment ignored so yes

You aren't a spokesperson for the population. You don't get to decide whether anybody except yourself is either willing or unwilling. You include false parameters like these into your debates because you are anti-reason, anti-fact and anti-honesty.

Side: 2nd amendment ignored so yes
outlaw60(15368) Disputed
1 point

Neither are you a spokesperson for American gun owners you Internet Troll !

You got a problem with private gun ownership in America ?

How is a Internet Troll going to control that ???????????

Side: My name is Excon
1 point

Neither are you a spokesperson for American gun owners you Internet Troll !

That's a false equivalence. I made no sweeping claims about American gun owners, you hebetudinous scuzzbucket.

Side: 2nd amendment ignored so yes
outlaw60(15368) Disputed
1 point

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-44053904

Gun crime: How do weapons appear on England's streets?

Side: My name is Excon
outlaw60(15368) Disputed
1 point

Butt Lunch you do not approve of the 2nd Amendment ? How does the 2nd Amendment affect the Brit Troll ????????

Side: My name is Excon
1 point

Is attemting to disarm an unwilling population tyranny?

Hello bront:

Nahh…

The Constitution CAN be amended, of course, where amendments themselves get repealed.. Therefore, IF the government was going to confiscate weapons, one would assume that they're going to do it CONSTITUTIONALLY..

In that case, gathering up the guns would be anything BUT tyranny..

excon

Side: My name is Excon
Bronto(2002) Disputed
1 point

Therefore, IF the government was going to confiscate weapons, one would assume that they're going to do it CONSTITUTIONALLY..

Question 1

So how will you go about accomplishing it seeing that the 2nd Amendment exists? Do tell.

Question2

How will you get em if the gangs, militant groups and we aren't giving them up?

Side: 2nd amendment ignored so yes
excon(18260) Disputed
1 point

So how will you go about accomplishing it seeing that the 2nd Amendment exists?

Hello again, bront:

I'm sorry.. I thought I was clear.. We'd AMEND the Constitution.

How will you get em if the gangs, militant groups and we aren't giving them up?

I dunno.. How about a house to house search??

Would there be a few gun nuts who'd oppose it? Sure.. So what? The government has MORE weapons than does your local right wing militia..

excon

Side: My name is Excon
Bronto(2002) Disputed
1 point

In that case, gathering up the guns would be anything BUT tyranny

So going house to house to steal private property and right to hunt food that many poor people depend on isn't tyranny? Okay, what is? Do tell.

Side: 2nd amendment ignored so yes
excon(18260) Disputed
0 points

So going house to house to steal private property and right to hunt food that many poor people depend on isn't tyranny? Okay, what is? Do tell.

Hello again, bront:

IF guns are ILLEGAL, rounding them up ISN'T tyranny.. That's just so.

excon

Side: My name is Excon
outlaw60(15368) Disputed
1 point

The Internet CONSTITUTIONAL SCHOLAR is for amending the 2nd Amendment and wanting a Police State ! What good LEFTIST values you have there SUPER STUPID !!!!!

Side: 2nd amendment ignored so yes
1 point

I don't want to disarm the population. I want to somewhat LIMIT the arms of the population. If you MUST have an assault weapon it should be an expensive, licensed, hobby, well vetted. No restrictions on hunting rifles with reasonable magazine capacities. Well vetted ownership on handguns, w/license, and another expensive license for YUGE collections. Ballistic samples on semi-auto handguns would be a nice requirement too, so a killing bullet might be traced rapidly to an owner. This would drastically cut down on crime and crazies! KEEP OUR GUNS ,,, within reason.

Side: My name is Excon
outlaw60(15368) Disputed
1 point

DIZZY can you define for us the term you COMMUNIST use ? Assault weapon !

What is a reasonable clip in your mind ??????

Has any of your FUCKIN INSANE claims worked in Chicago ????

How about California ?

What you are is STUPID and this quote proves it you COMMIE -KEEP OUR GUNS ,,, within reason.

Side: 2nd amendment ignored so yes
outlaw60(15368) Disputed
1 point

DIZZY says - I don't want to disarm the population. I want to somewhat LIMIT the arms of the population

So DIZZY how do you COMMUNIST get to your above goal ???????

Side: 2nd amendment ignored so yes