Is call of duty better than battlefield bad company two
two games have been released and people are saying call of duty is better and more relistic and has a much better than frostbites battlefield can you judge
call of duty
Side Score: 24
|
bad company 2
Side Score: 19
|
|
|
|
1
point
2
points
now im gonna support you Brink but i had to denounce you a point for your simplistic argument that makes all gamers look like fucking faggets. CoD is a better game all around. its more successful, it has better graphics, better storyline, more customization, a better story line, and kicks bad company's ass. end of story. Side: Call of Duty
1
point
battlefield bad company 2 is played by people who are full of themselfs call of duty has more online players and bad company always steals cod black ops was based in vietnam so what did bad company 2 do they made vietnam to try get more players so bad company are thiefs Side: Call of Duty
1
point
1
point
actually halo beat bad company to it. sorry. not trying to burst your bubble but your a fucking idiot. To compare Battle Field to Black Ops is to compare two shit games. Now as a series i doubt any game will ever take down CoD. The only one that i believe has a fighting chance is the new game coming out called Brink. It utilizes the latest and greatest movement software called S.M.A.R.T. ( Smooth Movement Across Random Terrain). This software allows you to basically Par-core your away across the map. no wall is too high. It completely destroys those invisible walls you find in other FPSs that keep your from climbing on a table or a wall that is just a few inches smaller than you even though you play a super soldier. That along with the brand new weapon and character customization and abilities makes me believe it will be the first and last for a VERY long time to give CoD a run for their money if not bring them down. Side: Call of Duty
.If you go with call of duty, go with black ops. You WILL NOT regret it. Bad Company 2 is just a horrible a game. However, Black ops has the extra game mode NAZI ZOMBIES originally from call of duty world at war. The only difference is the new guns and maps. Bad Company 2 does not have an extra game mode. I personally like black ops, and i think call of duty is better. Side: Call of Duty
I have all the call of duty games treyarch will never let their customers down bad company my brother likes because he is a sucker so no offense to bad company 2 but anyone would agree that it is way rubbisher than call of duty esspecially Black ops within 48 hours of realeased 1,500,000 copies of the game call of duty black ops and bad company 48 hours of being sold had 998,790 copies which proves that bad company sucks!!! I would be stupid to like bad company at all !!!!!!!! PS3QUEEN Side: Call of Duty
|
2
points
OK the first point i want to make about your statement is that you said cod has a bunch of good players that cant shoot for shit. question. how can a person be a good player in an FPS if he cant shoot for shit. Second. graphics are a very large part of what makes a good game. Besides the fact that Bad company 2s gameplay is shit compared to CoD. Everything about Bad company is cartooninsh and childish. Side: Call of Duty
2
points
2
points
it seems everyone is forgetting the, in my personal opinion, greatest feature in the game! the destructibility of the scenery! really quick points where its better in other aspects - Vehicles- in battlefield you can fly helicopters with gunners and drive multiple kinds of tanks Scenery- in battlefield you can destroy the scenery! if you shoot a grenade launcher at a house instead of the wall being fine, it actually blows up! i would love for you to show me a real house wall that can withstand a grenade launcher Squad based combat bigger and better maps no, unrealistic kill streak perks (you get what you get, if your recon, you can grab a morter, or hop on the UAV stand if your so bold) theres plenty more, just saying, thats enough to sway me, ive played both, extensively, and battlefield is just better, i cant even play cod anymore... Side: bad company 2
1
point
CoD is alright but you cant compare it to a game that actually requires strategy, noone here is stating facts, its all opinionated. I have played both games and put much time into both, Im a 6th Prestige on CoD 4 and a third on MW2. With Call of Duty, it has even been stated even by people of Machinima that its a free for all with people you cant shoot, where as with Battlefield, if you dont work as a team, the chances of having your objective completed is slim to none, for people actually defend the bases, unlike in CoD when as soon as you cap a flag or base, they run off to get more kills. Also maps are much bigger and destructible in battlefield!!!! Allowing for a more tactical approach to the game, which many legit war gamers appreciate. And most of all there is actually Vehicles in BF where as in CoD its up to you to run across the map, vulnerable to fire from enemy players who are just running around or "camping" which for some reason is looked down upon by the CoD community. Thereforth, Battle Field wins in Scenery, Platform,Weapons, Community, Multiplayer, and in my opinion Campaign. Side: bad company 2
1
point
Call of Duty is rehashed every year and is full of raging prebuscent boys who don't get enough attention at home (This isn't true for all the community however). Bad Company 2 somewhat requires practice (due to it being more realistic) but also seems to have a generally more mature community. I also consider it to have superior gameplay due to vehicle combat, wider range of maps and the realism provides more immersion. Side: bad company 2
|