CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.
Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.
You can share this debate in three different ways:
#1
#2
#3
Paste this URL into an email or IM:
Click here to send this debate via your default email application.
Click here to login and CreateDebate will send an email for you.
Is gossip a sign of low intelligence?
Do people gossip simply because they're not knowledgeable in constructive conversation? I don't get on well with a lot of people because I generally do not enjoy or partake in gossip.
Yes. Gossips is a form of destructive criticism that people with low intelligence uses to bring others into their level. Aggression is an important psychological defense so they may avoid looking down upon themselves. And continue believing in their false greatness
So as the saying goes
"Great people discuss great ideas, Average people talk about things, Small people talks about other people"
"Great people discuss great ideas, Average people talk about things, Small people talks about other people"
I really disagree with this quote. An average mind discusses all of the above. I'm sure that you have discussed ideas. I'm sure that you have discussed things. And I'm positive that you have discussed other people. We all have. This quote makes no sense. It assumes that you only talk about one thing. To me, that is a sign of a small mind.
I am definitely the competitor type. I get called a jerk a lot because of my competitiveness.
I'll compete with anybody in anything, anytime! With no hard feelings, but people don't understand that about me. lol Like when I got into fights at school , but still talked to the person I fought as if we never fought.
You have correctly quoted something from the wall in my grade school .. and your name makes you sound like a catfish .. (I agree with you, but sometimes I need to call a catfish a catfish) .. Do you like fish metaphors OK or do you prefer vegetable to animal ? ..
A. Some people can, and are, be all of those things at one time or another. Meaning, great people even gossip while small people can discuss great ideas and everything in between. To categorize people into those 3 definitions is vague and like I said not relevant or real at all.
B. Gossip is something that all people do all of the time whether you know it or not. People are constantly talking about other people, day in and day out. Whether it be about sports, television, food, whatever; everything involves people and therefore, people are always talked about in whatever people do; for good or bad; there are many forms of gossip.
And C. I've seen and read that quote so many times and it does not apply to people, in any way shape or form.
A. I agree, but compared to small people, only great men will not take gossips for truth
B. Nope, gossips are negative news spread by bored people without any valid proof yet they take it as fact. News and creative criticism does not belong to the definition of gossips
Never. Your intelligence also depends on how quickly you interact or react with people. A common thing in gossips are that in it, there are some situations when it goes out of control. But the thing is, we have to react quickly and with a good answer. It always happens in every gossip. Its just like debate. If someone challenges your stand then you have to react quickly. Debaters are considered highly intelligent. So why not the ones who are good in gossiping....
Actually...intelligent people tend to lack social skills and instead focuses their passion on improving their craftsmanship. The pace of talking has nothing to do with IQ level at all. Different people has different styles of talking but nevertheless, it is the quality of message that is being favored
Provided the criticism is constructive and direct to the person deserving of said education .. lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum
Provided the criticism is constructive and direct to the person deserving of said education .. lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum
It is not normal that people talk about others while they have own problems. Firstly people should rearrange own lives then give accusing speeches. Secondly it looks awful when someone is gossiping in bad way behind other's back. If you are so cool, go ahead and tell it face to face.
I have to disagree. If it's not normal then why does most of the american population gossip? Wouldn't the norm be the behavior that is most recurring? (I say american because I can not give an opinion on any other nations)
It is not normal. People start gossiping when they are unhappy/boring and etc. which in turn is not normal at all. Parents gave us education, they raise up us but they raised us not for gossiping. We should our lives, we should be so busy and we should not have time for gossiping. That is normal.
In general I find me talking about other people only because I'm kind of pushed into it by other people.
I'd prefer to talk about the Universe, our minds, and just shit that seems to seek a higher truth. Not what other people are doing.
But I'm also a strange person in other people's eyes. But the people I hang out with study biology and chemistry, so they aren't "dumb", but they seem to not give a shit about philosophy.
so i can't really say "low intelligence," and hell, the concept of working hard and studying to become someone who works for some corporation and attributes the Military Industrial Complex and apathetic Consumerism is despicable to me, but to them it's just the normal way.
So I'd say gossip is a sign of lacking self-awareness. These people are slaves, not "stupid" in the classical sense.
Ok you I can call on your grammar .. lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum
Provided we are classifying gossip as discussing personal details of another with a third party not within the zone of familiarity then I will strongly declare myself on the yes side. I suppose I should start reading up on the personal lives of celebrities, politicians and athletes so I can convey a modicum of small talk to people who need it to bond socially. (How about that game?)
Who told you I said this? Not that I did.... I bet it was Srom wasn't it? He's always causing trouble you know. I think it's because he hangs out with Dana, that girl is bad news but you didn't hear that from me.
Oh Josh. You'll never learn man! It was a joke... this debate is about "GOSSIP"... and my argument WAS gossip. Get it? No... LOL. That's the irony because I used you and Dana because I knew you two would be the only people that wouldn't get it.
I had a feeling it was a joke but it's hard to detect jokes on the internet. Maybe that is why I am so oblivious is because it's hard to detect jokes on here.
Let's see... it's a debate about gossip and I left an argument that was gossip.... it doesn't take a mind reader to get it... Srom is oblivious but what's your excuse? Ignorance?
lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum
I reported you because I think it's pretty cool that napolean dynamite is beside you as an animated gif .. lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum
You seem to be babbling unintelligently. lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum ..
You don't know my god(s), you only think you do .. lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum
lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum
No, in fact if could be quite the opposite. Sometimes people of higher intellect discuss people of lower intelligence just for short-term amusement. But, just like watching a lab rat on a wheel, it soon becomes boring, monotonous and not worth the effort.
Actually people of average intelligence speak poorly of people they don't have the ability to understand. Sometimes outliers are on the left side of the bell curve, sometimes on the right, and sometimes unconstrained by mainstream psychometrics .. lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum lorem ipsum
everybody gossips. one time or another. it doesn't have to be bad always. too much of anything is bad though. most people tend to become unpopular due to gossiping.
but it is a good way to vent out frustration about the person concerned.
but coming to the point. low intelligence? i think not.
I feel that we're ignoring what actually makes an conversation "intelligent" and despite what is believed, it's not the subject matter that makes it so. For one to exercise one's wits in the form of communication, they do not always have to fall back on "ideas". Anyone can discuss Plato or Chomsky, but to what degree of understanding and whether anything insightful or new is brought to light is a different matter all together. Sure, perhaps gossip doesn't require the most comprehension of all the types of communication, but it can still stretch intellect, and and often requires crude wit. For instance, even in the smallest of talk, people tend to throw jokes here and there, often to add to the relevance of the topic on hand and to add depth to the conversation. Even the most seemingly vapid of these jokes require some form of wit and introspection. In fact, many of these gossipers possess a sense of humor that a large chunk users on this website are sorely missing.
I think gossip is more a sign of poor emotional adjustment than low intelligence. I've known some rather simple individuals who do not indulge in gossip, and some very intelligent ones who do.
I think that gossiping has nothing to do with the intelligence of the person. More often people who have shallow relationships with other people do this, as well as, people who have low self confidence and tell negative things about others to feel more worthy.