What I want to know shithead is, where is your slant on the thread?

Yet you never asked. You think I care enough about you to waste time trying to answer a question you're too ignorant to even ask? You think too highly of yourself you worthless prick.

Are you one of these dirty little parasitic sub classes who leech off other people's contributions due to their inability to hold, and express an independent opinion?

And what exactly was your contribution? A pointless, worthless string of hypotheticals intended in "a lighted way"? I'm not sure you even know what "lighted" means; your comments weren't really that illuminating. What a funny guy. I can tell by your butthurt response how "lighted" you must be. Is that how you respond to everyone who doesn't laugh at your jokes?

You shouldn't use the same word twice in one sentence as you did with; accept.

It's not that I shouldn't do it, I just shouldn't have to. Repeating the same word twice in one sentence is intentional redundancy used to highlight that which should already be apparent. In this case, it's the fact that Idgaf about how you think I should "accept the post". I'll accept it however I want. It's like "No means no": beyond Layman's terms intended for degenerate lowlifes such as yourself.

The word ''or'' is a conjunction used to join two individual words

"Or" can be used to connect individual words, phrases or clauses. In this case, I used it to denote an alternative to the unstated antecedent: your own argument. Anyone with even the most basic reasoning capabilities should be able to see that. I wasn't previously aware of your astonishingly small mental capacity.

and not to start a sentence.

http://grammarist.com/grammar/conjunctions-to-start-sentences/

What kind of archaic, obsolete version of the English language have you been using? That's one of the most blatantly obvious BS facts that wanna-be grammar Nazis spew when attempting to sound intelligent. The only time this "rule" is useful is perhaps at education levels where students grammar skills are so rudimentary that they are unable to start a sentence with a conjunction without creating a sentence fragment. Go back to elementary school so you can feel accepted in your adherence to your fictitious grammar rule.

However, your improper grammar resulted in your comment taking the form of a question and you didn't finish with a question mark.

Even if it were true that starting a starting a sentence with a conjunction is a grammatical error, that wouldn't miraculously change the the sentence from declarative to interrogative. Now, I could use the word "or" if I was asking your opinion on the matter, but considering you have the IQ level of an inbred autist with a few extra chromosomes, quite frankly I'm not interested.

You know that energy also includes mass, right?

We're having an extra universe from nowhere.